• slappyfuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      The self censorship is really disheartening. I read a defense of it that I considered thoughtful, but I truly hate it. I don’t know what we should do about it. Mass resistance?

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I think it’s funny, because bukkake is just a noun, kind of meaning to splash or pour something over something else. There are even dishes called bukkake, e.g. bukkake soba. But since in the anglosphere it pretty much exclusively refers to the sexual act, that just has a very different connotation.

      • Pechente@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I mean that‘s always the issue with this dumb auto swear / dirty word detection. It is simply not context aware.

        Recently in a game of Hell Let Loose, someone wrote in chat that he needs hearing aids while playing and the game automatically censored „aids“ because of „get aids!“ and whatever shit someone might say in a shooter.

        This auto-censoring is particularly outrageous in a shooter where you can literally see people being torn to shreds by explosions.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sorry to pick nits, but if the definition is “to pour something over something else,” that’s a verb.

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          ぶっ掛け (bukkake) is a noun, like “a splash of coffee.”

          ぶっ掛ける (bukkakeru) is a verb, like “I like to splash around.”

          Granted, bukkake isn’t that kind of splash, it’s rather “they splashed water on the flames.”

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              No, they’re explaining it to primarily Americans, who typically don’t get a splash of cream in their coffee, so much as they get a splash of coffee in their milkshake.

              Thus, it works correctly.

              • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                since you’re going to pedant, pedant correctly. they don’t get coffee in their milkshake, they get espresso. when they get coffee, they get a splash of milk.

                • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  No, I am talking about Starbucks drinks, Frappucinos, which are basically milkshakes, that have vague hints of actual coffee in them, where the majority of the ‘coffee’ flavor somes from flavored syrups or chips or powders of some kind.

                  Those are far, far more commonly imbibed in the US, compared to the rest of the world, than the more traditional coffee with a splash of something, or a dirty ‘whatever’ via adding an espresso shot, a traditional latte, etc.

            • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Not quite the same, although interesting!

              In this case, “Bukkake” is a noun in both English and Japanese. “Bukkakeru” with the “ru” on the end is the verb form that the noun comes from. English didn’t change it, the picking of nits above just wasn’t quite correct.

              • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Technically the other poster’s definition of bukkake was what was not quite correct, the nits I picked were based on that.

                • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Haha fair enough. It’s kind of hard to define a nominalized verb in English, I feel, so I’d give it to him, but you’re free to pick all the nits 😂

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            So basically, bukkake/bukkakeru is nearly a direct translation to ‘splooge’.

            https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/splooge

            Where you can splooge your splooge all over someone, and then you’ll have splooged your splooge on them.

            And maybe you can be splooging untill the sun comes up, and people will say ‘nobody else splooges like that guy’.

            So, silly examples, but you can see ‘splooge’ is both the noun for the… resulting liquid, and also the verb for … ‘creating’ it, expelling it.

            Not exactly the same, grammatically, but pretty close.

      • WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Kinda like when I asked my daughter what she was watching and she said mukbang videos… (Unsure of the spelling). I was like WHAT ARE YOU WATCHING??

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m too lazy to remake this meme because of censorship. Unfortunately, this is how memes are trending thanks to AI and algorithms

        • I wonder how many references I am missing daily.

          I’ve watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail, and then started seeing references to it everywhere.
          I read 1984, and then started seeing references to it everywhere.
          I watched Idiocracy, and then started seeing references to it everywhere.
          I switched to Arch, and then started seeing references to it everywhere, btw.
          etc…

          And it doesn’t stop. This has to mean I still keep missing many. I’d probably scroll past this comment if I didn’t see that label on some Adata drive, since they don’t seem to be that common in EU.

    • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m no fancy bukkake expert, but I’d wager cleaning is easier and less risk of eye infection.

  • tomiant@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    Goggles? Shower cap? TISSUES???

    What kind of podunk bukkake is this?! No wonder no one showed up.

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      tbf, some people have sensitivity issues and are grossed out by cum on hair/eyes, they are still allowed horny and covered in cum if they want to

      • tomiant@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        “Yes I had a question about tonight’s bukkake, I am allergic to cum, do you have a vegan alternative?”

        Let me tell you, I was involved in organizing gangbangs in a major city, this was not once a thing.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    They didn’t cum because she covered her eyes and hair. That’s the whole point isn’t it? AIM for the eyes

  • Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    I can tell this is fake because “man passes up opportunity for free, consensual sexual act” is so far beyond fiction it’s not even funny.

    Although that does sound like an Onion article title.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, I’m entirely capable of standing around and jerking off on my own, without driving across town, without having to interact with the kind of people that would show up to an impromptu bukkake party.

        • OneStepAhead@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sounds like you want to plan yours out then. If you do so at your own home, we’ve solved most of your hurdles here!

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I mean, I would consider going to (or organizing) a planned sex party or something like that, but the problem for me here is mostly that it’s just bukkake.

            If the uh, the set of activities were a bit more diverse, or interesting, maybe me sitting around and not doing any work, like a lipstick party… or any number of things that actually require, or are considerably more enjoyable with another person or multiple people…

            That’d be more appealing.

            That, and, frankly, I kind of just find the idea of a bukkake scene inherently demeaning to women… or I gueas just any uh, subject, regardless of sex/gender.

            Sure, probably some ladies are into that, some guys are into that, etc.

            Just gives me bad vibes, don’t like the idea of treating someone’s face as a collective group cum dumpster, even if its consensual, just feels gross to me.

            Further, you’d need to vet the participants, screen/background check them generally, also screen for STIs/STDs, etc.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      From a misspent youth, I can tell you that many people, even straight men, ghost sex parties/moresomes, even with attractive cis women, even after paying a deposit in advance.

      • Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well you’re wrong on both counts, so at least you’re consistent.

        You may also be taking it far too seriously. I certainly wasn’t. It’s a ahitpost, not a documentary.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      wjC1Xa9crmOv1N9.png

      The original comment said bog brother. I spent minutes on this image, MINUTES, I will not have it tarnished by edits.

    • slappyfuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think tattoos have become extremely commonplace, that’s all. I haven’t watched porn in many years, but I would guess it’s just a reflection of a general societal trend.

      It shows up in the rantings and ravings of right wing nutjobs who lament these types of things. They once developed an AI to remove tattoos and make women dress more modestly, I have no doubt the porn is annoying them too.

      • Nomorereddit@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you don’t watch porn, then you’re speculating. Porn aesthetics aren’t a simple mirror of “societal trends” they’re shaped by platform algorithms, niche markets, and performer branding.

        Dragging in right-wing moral panic and some AI anecdote is just noise. Without firsthand exposure or actual data, this is guesswork, not insight.