• madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I fucking hate mega corps. It’s never fucking enough… Ever… Apple has more money than some countries yet these assholes want ever more…

    Tax all these assholes into oblivion!

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      One way, or another, that revenue stream will go to shit, they’re just doing a smash and grab while they can.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What exactly does Apple think that they’re brining to the equation in order to deserve that 30? Is it simply that they’re hosting an app on their store, so therefore they’re entitled to a cut?

    So if I write a novel, and get it published, Microsoft can say "We deserve 30% because you used our product to produce your product?

    I’m so fucking tired of corporations. It’s well past guillotine-o-clock.

    • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      What exactly does Apple think that they’re brining to the equation in order to deserve that 30?

      Because Valve can and Tim wants his yachts. No one is gonna stop em either. The App Store and Steam are the same thing: Store fronts that sell other peoples goods. You may say that Steam is just an app—don’t tell me, tell your representative

        • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          25 minutes ago

          You may say that Steam is just an app—don’t tell me, tell your representatives

          Tell your representatives, not me. According to our representatives, what Apple has is not a monopoly. You don’t have to convince me, you have to convince them. If you truly care about this issue, vote accordingly.

  • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Didn’t they just lose a lawsuit along these lines? I can’t imagine this going well for them.

  • hector@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    These Silicon Valley parasites are taking way more than a fair share. Every industry is Consolidated and the few gatekeeping corporations left take more than their fair share that is the entire problem. Capitalism does not work without controls. Never has, never will. This absolute free market talk has always been ad hoc, to further the business interests of those making the arguments.

  • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Why isn’t Apple trying to take 30% of all purchases through the Amazon app? Or eBay? Or your local grocery delivery? It’s the same exact thing. Such a stupid greedy fucking attempt

    • mcv@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Next they’ll take 30% on every transaction through my banking app.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think they’re trying to kill Patreon for some reason. Maybe they’ll launch their own Patreon competitor? Maybe they noticed developers were giving away iOS apps and getting crowdfunded on Patreon?

    • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Iirc it has to do with “monthly subscriptions” and they are arguing that Patreon is a monthly subscription and those get charged at the higher amount.

      It’s why subscribing to YouTube premium within iOS app costs more because Google just makes up the difference that way.

      Not that’s it’s right but it’s really debatable if Patreon should be considered a monthly subscription the same way streaming services are.

  • Bunbury@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Luckily I’m about to switch to graphene OS soon. I’ll be forced to make a bunch of changes to choices I made out of convenience in the past

  • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s wild that Steam is getting a class action lawsuit for charging 30% right now, and Apple doing shit like this at the same percentage and legally is getting a free pass.

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’ll throw a hat in the ring here. It’s because Steam has a grip on the gaming market that others want instead of them. That’s it, they want that money instead of Valve. Apple is getting a pass on this because it’s just fucking over the common guy which businesses couldn’t care less about.

      • mcv@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        But Valve doesn’t have a monopoly on PC games. You can sell your own game, or sell through GOG. On iPhone, Apple has the monopoly and they abuse it.

        • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I was trying to avoid the monopoly complaint because it’s bogus for the reason you said. The truth, Valve has a massive market share and people are very used to Steam, tied to it in many cases. Other publishers tried to set out on their own with their own store fronts and most of those have utterly failed. Even Epic still sells their games on Steam. It’s a powerful market with a lot of brand loyalty that those companies really do want themselves.

          • turmacar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 minutes ago

            Fair.

            Other than the “not actually a monopoly” argument, I think it’s important that Steam has that marketshare because they add value. They have a stranglehold on the market similar to the way BarCodes do. You don’t have to register your product with the bar code authority, but it will sure make your product more accessible to more people.

            And that’s before cloud saves, achievements, patching infrastructure, community forums, game recording/streaming, and other stuff built into the Steam client/API.

            Whether that’s worth a blanket 30% is absolutely a conversation worth having. Maybe it should be a sliding / bracketed scale depending on revenue or units sold or something. But like you said, the big lawsuits are coming from competitors, not smaller developers.

          • mcv@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            27 minutes ago

            True, but nobody is bound by it. There are other ways to sell on PC, there are no other ways to sell on iPhone. And games bought elsewhere will work just fine on a PC that has Steam installed. Anyone can leave at any time, or buy from anywhere. The only way to do that on iPhone is to switch your entire phone with Android. Apple’s position on the iPhone is far more controlling and monopolistic than Steam’s on PC.

            The Steam tax might be too steep as well, but these are not identical situations. It’s far easier to avoid Steam if you don’t want it. I prefer to buy from GOG, and only buy from Steam when it’s cheaper or not available on GOG.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Huh? It’s the businesses that will suffer from that 30% tax. It’s like suddenly seeing your Netflix subscription being more expensive and that triggers this “do I even need it anymore?” evaluation

        If it costs 13€ to support a 10€ Patreon pledge, then how do you expect the company to cover for that? Paying the creator less? Still, that will spawn competition, which again hurts the business

        • Robaque@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Just nitpicking, but if the usual price is 10€ and you want to offload the 30% tax to the consumers, pretty sure the maths should be 10/(0.7) ≈ 14.29€

  • dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’ve been warned many times in the past to not subscribe to people on the patreon app since it costs more then in browser because of the app store’s cut. So is this just even worse then it was or was that just for the google play store before?

    • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Ya I always subscribe on the website. Google and Apple have both charged extra fees for monthly subscriptions bought within the app.

    • DannyMac@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Sadly, I’m guessing this is transparent to iOS users, they think they’re supporting creators with $X each month, but behind the scenes, the creator is getting $X * 0.7 and then I’m guessing Patreon also takes some off the top of that for their infrastructure.

      • BanMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        This is why you can’t subscribe to Spotify or Netflix or a ton of other services through the app store apps, they aren’t gonna give up 30% revenue. Patreon is going to be the same eventually, creators will take it as a last resort, but they’ll absolutely scream “go to the website to donate to me,” or maybe even disable iOS app contributions.

        Kind of like how the nonprofits I’ve been part of have to pay a CC processing fee which varies by processor and card, so they don’t accept AMEX or Discover cards, and then stress “please send us a check instead,” and if a donation is over a certain amount, they won’t accept it by CC at all. If you’re going to donate $30k or $100k or more, no fucking way are we giving thousands of dollars to a processor. Write us a check, we’ll accept it in person, and take a photo of us fellating you, suitable for framing.

  • Zexks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Its the same with pretty much EVERY app on the apple store. Everything there is 30% more than the same thing bought elswhere