• dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Apple is doing nothing in this particular case, not in general. There’s cases where the 30% is more justified.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Oh is there some case where Apple is creating the content inside the app??? Do tell.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        I meant more if people wouldn’t have found your app without Apple’s App Store. In that case, they’re essentially handling marketing for you.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Being in the AppStore gives you access to a lot of people. I don’t feel it’s at all relevant whether you happen to also have other exposure elsewhere. Apple charges you for the exposure you get from them, period. If you don’t want to pay for it, because you’re so successful on other channels, just don’t. Don’t have an iOS app. But for years we’ve had people who want an iOS app but also want to complain about sharing what they make from it. They still make too much to be willing to pull their app, but they complain anyway: because who doesn’t want higher margins.