

How the fuck is that even legal to force opt in on location.
Google has gotten in a lot of shit for not properly letting people control that before and delete histories.


How the fuck is that even legal to force opt in on location.
Google has gotten in a lot of shit for not properly letting people control that before and delete histories.


Over generation is very big. I agree batteries are better, though.
We need to be able to support peak winter heating and peak summer cooling and we need to do that with excess margin.
Everything in between we have excess power, unless it’s something like hydro dams which are easy to control and aren’t a big extra cost and part of how they naturally operate.
We generally use gas peaker plants to help which we can turn off or on, but it’s more efficient to not do that, and those are expensive.
It would also make it easier to build big nuclear plants if we could manage the off peak load into batteries for the day.


For phones / portables, assuming it doesn’t draw more power, it would mean shorter download times, which means less battery usage.


Wireless 4k 120hz streaming from my PC to TV would be pretty sweet. I can run a cable if i really wanted… but this would be easier. It’s still more than that, but getting that would be sweet.


CNN has a video with multiple angles of it all
https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/25/us/video/minneapolis-ice-shooting-alex-pretti-visual-analysis-digvid
You can clearly see them disarm him and remove the gun from the beating area prior to murdering him in it.


I appreciate the pause in that video to show when the gun is unholstered. With all the videos going around and they move so fast it was hard to see but that makes it super clear.


Time to put a goatse picture in front of the camera!


You think ICE is going to go as far as lighting houses on fire to get someone to exit?


Pretty sure a ‘hidden’ room is a good spot to shoot from if that’s the decision you’re going to make.
It will make it more obvious they are about to enter it somehow.
edit: Also boobytraps would probably be effective at that point as well.


I mean ya, if they’re coming into the house they’re going to come and get ya administrative warrant or not (edit: because we all know they’ll come in even without that), and if you can’t get a lawyer to prevent yourself from being deported before they deport you, none of this does any good.
But if you can manage to get as far as they entered, and had to search to find you, and they didn’t just deport you anyway before being able to get in front of a court, it would make a difference in theory.


The article says it’s also not a search warrant, which backs up their claim saying they can enter because they aren’t searching.
Which is stupid.
But if it’s not a search warrant, and they start doing this, I wonder if there’s some way to protect yourself by requiring finding you in the house to constitute a search?
Like what if you attached a bookshelf to your bedroom door. And you had to move a book to access the handle?
That’s a search?
Maybe that’s a way to try to continue legally protecting yourself within their illegal entry? Or something like that anyway.
That linking of comments is pretty cool.


This is the whole being poor keeps you poor thing.
You can’t afford $200-300 outright, but you can afford the monthly plan that costs $20 more but ends up costing $490 instead of $250 .
You can’t afford the $300 winter boots, so you buy the $100 ones that fall apart in 2 seasons instead of lasting a decade.
Ah that’s fair.
Do you need a higher resolution for a logo like that? How big will it ever be?
Could be done in rotoscope? Never enough of that.
You’d maybe want a video of them drawing it for real if you wanted to defend that they were in fact real but made to look like slop lol
My gaming video card can toss out a handful of these a minute, you don’t need to use a premium service.
A lower end card would just take longer but still work.


Ya, that’s fair. Both our separate conversations have merit and could maybe help people who aren’t behaving like that.
My understanding of false accepts is when it think it hears the wake word and starts recording.
Sometimes it happens when I watch TV or rarely in a normal conversation.
If this happens, what else would you expect to happen? It’s going to behave exactly as if you woke it.
Stop talking if you notice, but unless you expect a perfect wake word rate with zero mistakes there’s nothing that can be done.
Now, if Google is intentionally waking it when it knows it’s not the right word that’s another matter entirely.
Edit: I’d refuse to accept any wrong doikg as well if it’s legit false accepts. But if it was intentional, this isn’t even a slap on the wrist for them.