I know the grid in Texas is (was?) separated from the main national grid, and I guess, maybe something like this could eventually lead to a state wide grid that’s disconnected from the main grid, and maybe that’s very much the long term intention and a real problem.

It would take awhile to manifest as a big issue though as at least the blurb indicates it has to be for newly built power plants and new loads.

If a data center wants to build their own offgrid power system though I don’t see the harm in that? In the future they might very well be building SMR’s to power only their facility.

I think it should all still be overseen by whatever existing regulations there are and kept to the same standards though. And maybe some rules about connecting them to other purpose built ones under this same grouping?

Like, Apple builds one, and then Google builds one. Google and Apple can’t join together.

Maybe even limit it to some strict commercial type use, so Google can’t be doing this to power a google city where residents live.

Edits: Clarity and thoughts along those lines.

Edit: Oh and it should be mandated to be green energy.

The idea and motive and intention is great. The (edit: eventual) outcome is always evil.

I like to think if I was in a position to be working with data like that, that I could ‘accidentally’ forget to redact it one time and trigger a leak like this.

They publicly released that data at that point though through their own failures, fuck Flock for trying to suppress it.

That’s really sad.

I’ve used AI to help clean up my sentence structure for copy, but if I am not super explicit with it to not rewrite what I wrote, it will do as you said and take the human element out of it.

I asked a question like 8 years ago, and people are still replying with new answers either due to new APIs or tooling, and for some reason just alternative ways that already existed for years.

That only works if your initials are D.T.

Tusk is safe at least.

Hopefully they’re just setting that up and in the meantime did this.

I would have bought it for that purpose if it was available.

I’m really loving this new Microslop name.

Also… looks like someone bought www.microslop.com and redirected to their own site: https://www.philipncohen.com/

Not sure what the rules are where you are, but one way is to check the menu for calories if they need to be listed.

Then you can tell exactly what the size difference is between a small, medium and large, assuming they aren’t lying about the calories, and that they actually fill it to the proper size listed per the calories.

That is hilarious. At that point if I was annoyed enough, I’d do something like hang a picture in the house taking a dig at Wikipedia and then the interview could mention that and now it could be in the article about the house taking a dig at them.

For every new drug discovered by humans, there are hundreds humans spit out that aren’t possible.

I’ll say it again… the person I replied to was generalizing machine learning, not specifically LLMs

It’s simply how machine learning works, you train it on some data and the output will always be the reult of the training data.

That’s also why “AI” is unable to invent something.

Person I replied to was talking about machine learning.

They do that to, but not only that.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgr94xxye2lo

The drugs were designed atom-by-atom by the AI and killed the s uperbugs in laboratory and animal tests.

… a part kinda like you were saying, then

The second gave the AI free rein from the start.

The design process also weeded out anything that looked too similar to current antibiotics. It also tried to ensure they were inventing medicines rather than soap and to filter out anything predicted to be toxic to humans.

Scientists used AI to create antibiotics for gonorrhoea and MRSA

Once manufactured, the leading designs were tested on bacteria in the lab and on infected mice, resulting in two new potential drugs.

They’re using it to create new drugs today.

It’s using what we know about science, and what we know about the targets and inventing new drugs that work (and are still in trials)

I wonder how that would go in court, I wonder if it’s been tried before? I could see an argument that if that was the intention and how they made money via gained followers, even indirectly, maybe it wouldn’t be fair use.

Edit: Like if they gain followers reposting grok modified images, and then they also show sponsored ads to their followers, now they are benefiting commercially by gaining followers via modified grok images. That might not be fair use, assuming the modified item was fair use to begin with otherwise.

May I introduce you to Fair Use Doctrine.

https://www.dmca.com/FAQ/What-is-Fair-Use

I wasn’t going to log in to verify either lol.

Even if that’s the case, it will come down to fair use policy which will allow quite a lot.

If the specific instance of sharing isn’t fair use and Twitter allows it, then sue them, someone will. Reddit for example though is just littered with modified images and they’ve been fine. Same with Lemmy.

Edit: If someone starts trying to make money off modified images via Grok, then that becomes a much easier case to win.

new tool could be used to modify others’ works without their consent.

This specific part is kinda stupid.

Nothing was ever preventing anyone from modifying an artists work. Its incredibly common. No one needs consent to modify anything.

To distrubute something that isn’t yours that doesn’t fall under fair use, absolutely. But modifying without consent is a joke.

Some people have relationships like that with their longtime family Dr, I never have though, nor do I even have one right now.