The right to assemble and protest is enshrined in American law, but it can still be dangerous to hit the streets to make your voice heard. Your devices are a treasure trove of information about you, and you may not always know who’s collecting that data. Take a few minutes before you go to assess your digital and physical safety. Even if you have nothing to hide, you don’t want to accidentally give law enforcement officials any information you didn’t intend to share. Follow these tips to lock down your phone before a protest or other peaceful assembly.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    18 minutes ago

    Shitty article. Doesnt even contain the words SIM card or IMEI so it has no business advising people on whats safe to bring to a protest. There is no such thing as cop-proofing a mobile phone unless all wireless modules have been removed. The cops can and do track peoples cell tower signal derived locations and they can log active Wifi/Bluetooth MAC addresses in their vicinity.

    As others have said, just dont bring it if you are scared. Consider just using a bodycam or gopro style camera.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    Cripes all of that and not even, “Buy a burner SIM card”, “Use a VPN at all time if you have to use data”, “For the love of god don’t use biometrics as authorization, use a alphanumeric password to unlock”, “Use the damn encryption solution provided by your phone’s OS”.

  • Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Cant u just use encrypted messaging services like whatsapp signal telegram? SMS isn’t encrypted. And this is also why you shouldn’t give tech billionaire companies so much power as a nation lol they abuse ur privacy thats why I love how EU is still trying to protect our rights at least

    • ApertureUA@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      39 minutes ago

      Not relevant. Unless you use airplane mode, it will be visible that your phone was at the place.

    • onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      whatsapp signal telegram

      Telegram isn’t encrypted, and honestly you shouldn’t use it.[1] Whatsapp and Signal are US-based, which means that they will give up your data on the first request.

      Use actually secure messengers, like Delta Chat, SimpleX, or Matrix with end-to-end encryption.

      • Kay Ohtie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        Signal have published several times when they receive a request for data and their response.

        Due to the mechanisms they employ, all they can actually give is if there’s an account associated with a phone number and the last time it logged in, if even that last bit. There’s some fairly detailed articles diving into how this works so well under the hood from a cryptographic standpoint, but it basically amounts to even addresses of users being able to be secret to minimize shared metadata to a bare minimum.

        Also the software is entirely open-source – app and server both – and are frequently audited on this. The server never has an opportunity to receive any plain-text data to store.

        The weak spot is always just having access to your device.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        It’s a little clunky, but KryptEY is an on screen keyboard that can encode/decode messages. The encoded messages can be transmitted over any service.

  • ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Just don’t bring it. Bring a digital pocket camera instead to document stuff.

    Nowadays, you can’t use a mobile phone without signing in to some Google service or Apple. It’s mandatory. Giving them access to every data you own.

  • mr_sunburn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This might be relevant for following ICE around or direct action, but at this point there’s almost zero personal risk from attending something like a rally or a march.

    My relatives and even friends my age are afraid to go to protests. They read stuff like this, and it acts as demobilization messaging. In my experience, once you get them to go once they’re no longer afraid to engage, but there’s an initial fear and anticipatory obedience that has to be overcome.

    inb4 protests do nothing: getting people to stick their toe in the water helps build commitment that will one day be necessary to gain critical mass for more organized disobedience.

    • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This might be relevant for following ICE around or direct action, but at this point there’s almost zero personal risk from attending something like a rally or a march.

      No. If the data exists at any point, then a future threat will be able to exploit it, so full on nazi style fascism might not be here yet, but when it is, you’ll be in danger. Data can sleep forever before it becomes a threat.

    • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I go to protests without my phone, and I’m afraid every time.

      I get that nothing is likely to happen to me, but it could. I get that this is am irrational fear. But idk strategically what to do.

  • baller_w@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Faraday bag all electronic items; phone, smartwatch; hell, I’d even bag my car keys. Cover your face, especially the eye area. Make your voice heard, but don’t be a data point.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah. I see so many protesters with their face not covered. Cover your face!!!

      Also, dress like them. You want to create as much confusion as possible.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Don’t bring your phone period. Any and all devices can be broken into by law enforcement. Buy a burner with cash if you need some kind of communication.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yes a burner that you don’t activate. Keep it in a faraday bag. In an emergency you can take it out and call 911.

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Its not the device cracking that’s the problem; its the “your device was identified at the protest we have labeled a riot and has been tracked to your home, which we will now raid in the middle of the night”.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        No, , this isn’t the 90s. You want a many copies as possible immediately, later might not happen.

  • Carmakazi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    IMO just having your personal device on you in the presence of a protest puts you in danger. They have ample tools to track cellular devices that basically cannot be guarded against without disabling the function altogether, such as with a Faraday bag. They will catch and log that you were at a protest, and use that against you later.

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I bring my phone, and my wallet, and my keys, and a $7,000 camera, and my lawyer’s phone number in my head.

    they can suck my balls

    always film cops

  • suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Shut off and leave your phone at home, buy a pay-as-you-go to bring with you for emergency contact/coordination

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Shut off and leave your phone at home, buy a pay-as-you-go to bring with you for emergency contact /coordination

      Leave the pay-as-you-go phone powered off too, and only power it up if you actually have to use it. If you have to use it once, you need to get a replacement for a future event.

      I’m thinking perhaps something like Meshtastic transmitters and receivers should be used for coordination instead.

      • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Meshtastic is exactly what needs to be implemented

        I ran across that instance the other day and immediately thought about coordination.

        It’s like sneaker net for piracy.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Meshtastic is just as susceptible to listening and isn’t perfect at encryption or anonymity but should be another tool to consider when cellphone towers are down or otherwise unusable.

        • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s alright for non-critical stuff. Ok for getting help, not the best for coordinating action.

          Reticulum is an alternative network/protocol that focuses more on security and interconnection of different networks

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I believe there are Bluetooth network protocols that mesh that would work for messaging and not require cell service. It would be smart to organize using something like that and just use any cell phone without cell service turned on. That still gives you the ability to call 911 in case of emergencies as well.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Cell service is always turned on on a phone, even with no SIM card and the phone in airplane mode, and for most phones, even when the phone is “off”. They still ping the local towers semi regularly; they just don’t ramp up transmission power ir try to establish a full connection.

        Anyone got a list of Bluetooth devices without a cell antenna where the BT MAC is regularly scrambled?

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        True, but if surveillance is your concern, they are monitoring Bluetooth devices too.

        • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Does that matter? If it’s a device that you bought used just for this? There is no name attached to that device at that point. Buy it used on Craigslist, use it for the event, throw it away. It can be any cheap, crappy phone.

      • Lee Duna@lemmy.nzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        You can use Briar, BitChat, or Bridgefy to communicate, without having internet connections. I’ve only tried Briar, which works with cell networks, wifi, also bluetooth.

      • Horsecook@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        That show finished airing 18 years ago…

        Thinking about it, that show is a terrible reference. Modern phones didn’t exist in it, as they hadn’t been invented yet. The first iPhone was released while the last season of The Wire was filming, and the App Store didn’t come out until a few months after the final season had aired. It’s from an entirely different era.

  • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    If it makes you feel better, go nuts.

    But they have Face ID, gait ID, they have the signal from your cellular-equipped car, on and on. Even if your phone is “off” it’s transmitting an ID for antitheft purposes. Your smartwatch is leaking your location, and your smart tags.

    Leave the car at home? They can track your public transit card via the credit card you used to fill it.

    Stay home and post online? Palantir has Reddit posts from deleted accounts they will dig up to torpedo your future political ambitions as they did with Graham Platner.

    We are all on the regime’s naughty list. Might as well make the most of it and demonstrate peacefully. And without a mask so you don’t look like an agent provocateur.

    It’s Spartacus time.

  • jaschen306@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Would an old school walkie talkie be a better solution? You want to be able to communicate within a group in case shit happen

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That depends what you’re trying to solve. For a lot of people, they’re still gonna need their phone. I don’t think “Just use a walkie talkie bro” would read as very helpful advice to the average person.

      If, however, you are the sort of person organizing a protest or other similar activity, yes, absolutely, walkie tallies are great. A lot of people who do serious political activism talk about how radio is still the most resilient communication method. Not fool-proof, you definitely need to study up on the limitations, but an invaluable tool to be aware of.

      If you are going to a protest as a group, and you have the resources to invest a few hundred bucks, getting a set of walkie-talkies for the group plus a dedicated burner one responsible person to carry (maybe someone who will be in radio range but clear of the actual happenings) is also a solid strategy, but we also shouldn’t be acting like “Going as a group” and “spending a few hundred dollars” are prerequisites for being politically active. There need to be solutions for everyone.

    • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I think FRS is the only thing legally available without a license. You can buy GMRS radios on Amazon that will communicate with FRS radios on all of the FRS channels, see here:

      https://wiki.radioreference.com/index.php/FRS/GMRS_combined_channel_chart

      However, these radios are VERY limited in an urban area with lots of concrete towers. In my experience the GMRS radios on “high power” really only go one little valley over out in the woods. In the city you might get two or three blocks because of all the concrete. You are required to have a license to use GMRS and identify your station every 15 minutes but almost nobody does it. Hell, I listen to the local walmart using GMRS and you’re not even supposed to use it for commercial purposes.

      Maybe Meshtastic? That’s a radio I haven’t messed with and I don’t know about it’s performance in an urban environment.

      Ear piece highly recommended. The audio is not like a phone call and in a loud environment you will not be able to copy. Practice beforehand because radio is not like a phone call, you need to have some experience.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yes. You can get them cheap online and they have a built in “encryption” function that isn’t well protected but might prevent people from listening in realtime.

  • DaMummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    What’s the plan for having your phone at home? They’re going door to door and shooting innocent white American citizens.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Lol, lmao even. That’s some careful word play for the sake of unneccesary hyperbole.

      They have shot innocent white American citizens. In some other places they have gone door to door. Those are independent actions, not a combined reality. We can all agree they’re god awful as a massive understatement without lying about door to door murder squads.

      Inb4 “if you have to make that kind of distinction you’re already fucked” yeah, we are, but accurate information about the ground situation is vital for any forward movement.

      • GhostPain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        Man, that’s a Reddit-pedantic “you forgot PEDMAS” -like response to someone worrying about getting their home raided and asking a simple question.

        You’re not fucked. You’re a dick. And being one isn’t “vital” to anything.

    • GhostPain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      What’s the plan for having your phone at home?

      #00 inserts for my pump action wireless hole punch.

      • archonet@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        No no, you’ll need slugs if you want to hole-punch any body armor.

        Not that I would know what you aim on using your wireless hole-punch for.

        • Horsecook@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          12ga slugs don’t reliably penetrate soft armor, and don’t penetrate hard armor. The proper tactic for armored assailants is to aim for the groin.

          • GhostPain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            25 minutes ago

            The proper tactic for armored assailants is to aim for the groin.

            I mean, one to the chest will at least slow them down, but yea, I can get on board with blasting some dicks off. lol