• 1 Post
  • 1.92K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle

  • So like… I feel scared about the idea of like… just going for a walk all by myself…

    How about making a list of the things you think would possibly happen to you going for a walk by yourself that would justify being rationally scared. Then go through the list and consider even if each event is possibly, how probable is it? I think you’ll find that that things you’re most afraid of are the least likely to happen.

    Now as a comparison, make a list of all the things that could happen to you staying at home. Another list of all the things that could happen to you being driven to your destination. Assign realistic probabilities to each event. I’m guessing you’ll find that the probabilities of bad things on each of these three list will all look pretty equal. If they are equal, then going for a walk is no more dangerous that staying home or being driven somewhere.

    In a sense, if you’re afraid to go for a walk, you should be equally or more afraid of going for a drive or staying at home. As such, its not more dangerous to go for a walk than the other option.





  • I feel like the problem here is that you get people who are curious or like the other features the fridge has and just get what they can when theirs goes out. And while, sure, those people learn not to do that again,

    Part of what makes us intelligent is learning from others. I guess I would expect buyers to do even the most basic research on a large dollar figure purchase which would likely expose them to the headlines about Samsung putting ads on fridges after the sale.

    Do people actually just walk into an appliance store and just drop more than $1k on what they see on the floor without researching reliability, warranty, or other features from articles and news sources?












  • I think we’ll have to agree to disagree. Often times if I see an interesting question in the comments, I am glad for it, because that was the insight I needed to want to read the article and answer it.

    Just reading comments without the article? I have no issue with that at all, and do that myself.

    For me that isn’t annoying unless the commenter is getting something wrong that is talked about in the article, and doubles down on it.

    How do you, as the commenter yourself, know you aren’t getting something wrong without reading the article?

    I feel like each post is an invitation to discuss the general topic

    How do you know what the general topic is without reading the article?

    If you feel like that is disrespectful, I get where you’re coming from, but I don’t think it is that disrespectful.

    Maybe disrespectful is too strong a term. Let me amend that; I lose respect for the poster when they’re asking a question that is answered in the article. I sometimes write off engaging with them further in that thread because they’re clearly not even doing the most basic of tasks to be a part of the conversation.

    But plenty of interesting conversations can happen in the comments (like this one) that have almost nothing whatever to do with the article!

    I’ll do this too on occasionally, if I can clearly tell we’re not discussion the article topic, but its a gamble on my part and if someone smacks me down because it is article topical, I fully own that and apologize knowing its my fault.