• TurboToad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why do people keep reposting this shit?

    Which console costs 400$?

    Which reasonably price optimized PC costs 15k$?

    Yes PCs are more expensive than consoles, but they also hold more value, are more versatile and have lower costs for the Games themselves.

    To each their own, we’re alle gamers.

    • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fine, im in Canada and a ps5 costs $500 and a decent current gen gaming pc costs about $3000 where I am. And no I am no interested in building a pc anymore than I am building a ps5. So off the shelf you’re looking at a 1.5-2k pc just to match the ps5. So not 15k but easily triple the cost of a ps5.

      What I like about consoles is that I know the game will always work on my console. I could buy a top end pc and it won’t play next years top games that well

      • TurboToad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Idk about the prices in canada but 3000 CAD shouldn’t give you a “decent current gen gaming pc”. This is already high end territory where you’re already burning money unnecessarly just to have the latest an greatest. For 2500 CAD you can get a prebuild 9070 XT + 7800X3D system (here). This system destroys the PS5 performance wise. I can get 240-300 FPS in the Finals while the PS5 can get a max of 120 FPS in performance mode with hits to the visual fidelity.

        And yes a PS5 is 579 CAD as far as I can see, so a lot cheaper.

        However as I stated a PC can run way more different games even without taking emulation into account. Furthermore on PS5 you have to pay 110 CAD/year to play online and PC games generally are cheaper than console games. So there is a significant amount of money you’ll save on the software.

        Additionally you kinda are forced to buy a new console when the new generation arrives while I can use my PC for the newest games as long as I want to or the hardware just can’t handle it anymore.

        And lastly a PC can also be used for non gaming stuff. You can even get use of the performance for 3D modeling, Video editing, running LLMs or whatever.

        So as I stated before both have their use cases, a PC is definetly more expensive up front buy it also just offers more value. At the end it doesn’t matter and everyone can play games on the hardware they want to.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The console is subsidized by the games being more expensive. In the emd, the console is more expensive but you have it ready-to-use. While you have more choice on PC and can mod the games. To each their own.

        • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          The games are the same cost on pc for the same game.

          For me it works better in the end, i pop it in and I know it’s gonna run. Also my library system has games, even on release day. And I use psplus, So I haven’t paid full for a game in a while.

          You can also save a vintage console. PCs just get old

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    $400 console

    The only thing that qualifies is an Xbox series S, even Switch 2 is $450 lmao.

    Even funnier when you consider “PC” consoles like Steam Deck or Legion which gives you a even wider access to games, including exclusives thanks to emulation.

    Hell Sony and Microsoft gave up on the console exclusive system because PC & Steam demonstrated the expanded market is worth the tradeoff when your console hardware is basically a computer.

    That didn’t used to be the case even up to the PS4 when the hardware was still targeted for games like high VRAM, but that’s no longer the case.

    It gets even better with Switch emulation because it was a glorified Android tablet that was already outdated on arrival, meaning you can play Switch games even on your phone thanks to ARM instruction pass-through techniques.

  • Daxelman@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    The only people who care about shit like this are the people who don’t play video games.

    A lot of you don’t play video games.

  • DoubleDongle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    The real reason I’m better than the console plebs is that I still play multiplayer on twenty-year-old games.

      • Cruel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        When 1.6 came out I was stubborn and refused to install Steam which was needed for it. But I eventually did and it eventually grew on me even though recoil and everything is a bit different. Still using my 22 year old steam account.

  • Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Don’t need to buy a new console every few years.
    When getting to slow can upgrade single components.
    Cost/performance is basically on par with consoles at the moment.
    Completely ignores the fact that consoles are a type of computer and the gaming companies can not sell console + games at +/-0 or they’ll go out of business.

    The fuck you on about?

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I over the last 15 years I’ve bought a total of 4 consoles. Ranging from $300 and below, and only 1 of those was an upgrade. The other 3 were different consoles to play different exclusives. We’ll just call it $1200 plus $150 for extra controllers and headsets. How much have you spent on your PC since you bought it?

      • I’ll chime in:

        Since purchase at $1200 for a custom build in 2020, I’ve spent $500 upgrading storage and my video card for my PC. It can push most modern games at 80fps with ray tracing on low and all other settings on high. Leveraging frame-gen it can do 2k120.

        It also holds about 5TB of music and movies, and hosts them on a server which I can access anywhere via a URL pointed to my tunnel.

        It also has a DAW, an IDE, and a Nextcloud instance, also accessable anywhere.

        $1700 in for total liberation from the tech overlords is worth it. The 500+ games in the steam family library are just a bonus.

        • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I am cheap. I only buy games on sale or f2p. Wouldn’t be fair comparison. Probably less than $500 in 15 years.

          • Baŝto@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I probably paid four times as much on PC games because I bought way more than I could ever play 🤔

            But 1000 is probably what my initial build did cost.

  • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    For $800 I think you can get a laptop that is more powerful than consoles, with similar GPU power, but you also get all the benefits of PC gaming. You can’t even mod most console games, which is reason enough to never buy a console. It’s just a way inferior way to game.

    • melfie@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can confirm that I got a laptop a couple years ago for $800 that has a RTX 4060, i7, and 32Gi of RAM. Beats a PS5 on paper, which is supposedly more equivalent to a RTX 2070, though games optimized for PS5 hardware make the difference more marginal.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      105
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      These days its like 1500. But you still get all the advantages like being able to do whatever you want with it like using productive software to actually do work. Streaming, editing, rendering, 3D modeling or printing, game dev, etc

      • miss phant@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        3 days ago

        You will also most likely still make that difference back over the cycle of one console generation through better game deals and no subscription fees for online play.

        • papalonian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m still a PC player through and through, but I will say that the game subscriptions that give you access to AAA games (albeit sometimes a bit after launch) is pretty enticing. Obviously you get better sales and whatnot through Steam, but not having to shell out 50-70 dollars for a new game is pretty cool.

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I would say a console killer has to outperform a current gen console. A Xbox Series X has a GPU equivalent to something between a 9060XT and a 9070XT. So yeah in total 1100€ is probably gonna get you something comparable.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        3 days ago

        That period repeats every 3-5 years approximatly towards the end of a generation but before the new generation is announced.

        • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          We’re at that point now. Hard to believe, but the PS5 has been out for five years now.

          The reason it’s not happening this time is because Moore’s Law is dead. The original formulation was that cost of integrated components would be cut in half every x months. The value of x changed around over the years, but settled on 24. That cost factor is gone and probably won’t come back without a major breakthrough.

          There are improvements in the size of integrated components (which often gets mistakenly labeled as Moore’s Law), but they aren’t getting cheaper anymore.

          • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            Ps5 sets my record for most dead joysticks, followed by the Nintendo Switch joycon disaster.

            PS4 I had a few controllers die, but that was parts physically breaking.

            PS3 I never lost a controller.

            I have to go back to N64 for any other broken controllers where the sticks die or buttons break.

            • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              PS3 I had to get a new controller, but only because the dog ate the analog sticks lmao. Still using the Mini USB cable it came with 🫡

              I had to replace the Micro USB port in two DS4s. I don’t even blame Sony for it, Micro USB is ass. I do blame them for both controllers getting stick drift later though.

              I don’t use the PS5 enough for the controller to break.

              • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                I’m 3/3 on ps5 controllers breaking.

                I bought the pro controller when it came out and it hasn’t broken.

        • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          There was a generation where it was true at the launch of the console. That’s the period I’m talking about. Beating a 5 year old machine is hardly worth bragging about.

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            We are talking about price relative to performace, not performance in general.

            But the cost of the hardware is anyways not so relevant when the price difference of the software easily makes up the difference.

            • Anivia@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yes, and you could beat the price of a PS4 at release with a pc that performed the same. No other console generation had such bad price/performance

      • paultimate14@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nah it’s the GPU market. Cryptocurrency briefly exploded and now AI is sucking up all of the GPU manufacturing capacity. Back in 2019 I got my RX580 for $175. The AMD 9070 that released this year is a tier down from that and had an MSRP of $550, but an actual price more like $650. The sweet spot of value PC building has shifted from $750 to $1,500 in just a few years. Some of that is just general inflation that affects all parts, but roughly half of that increase is just from the GPU.

        It’s impacting consoles too. Consoles uses to get cheaper over time, with both price drops to existing models and new, cheaper models being released (Sony’s Slim models, things like the Wii Family Edition and Wii Mini, the DSLite, etc). Looking at this generation… The original PS5 with a disc drive debuted at $500 in 2020. The “Slim” version also debuted at $500, and just got a price increase to $550. They released a PS5 Pro at $700, and just increased it to $750.

        Nintendo is doing it too. The Switch was $300 for its entire life, and now that the Switch 2 is out consumers would typically expect a price cut to move the existing stock. Instead, Nintendo raised the price to $330. The OLED model went from $350 to $400, and the Lite went from $200 to $230.

        And of course Microsoft is in on it too. It’s more complicated to write up since they have different storage variants of the Series S|X, but for example a Series S 512GB was $300 at launch (For some reason I remember seeing them for $250, but maybe that was a Black Friday sale or something). Now it’s $400!

          • paultimate14@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 days ago

            They’ve increased in other countries too. The PS5 digital edition costs £70 more today than it did at launch. In 2024 Sony increased the Japan price of all PS5 versions by ¥13,000.

            The tariffs aren’t helping, but this has been a trend for years. The gaming console market is not very volatile- prices changes in the US usually happen once every few years, not every few months. The tariffs keep fluctuating all over the place and I would not be shocked if there are more pricing adjustments for consoles specifically next year.

        • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          You can blame crypto, you can blame AI, but when it comes down to it everything is worth what people are willing to pay. Clearly companies are pushing that further and further and people keep paying.

      • Dettweiler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I recall it being a period of at least 10 years. A prior generation GPU would run about $150-200. The CPU/Mobo was the most expensive part

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, but all those people buying wonky 2GB “PS4 equivalent” GPUs ended up pretty quiet when games later in the generation started using more and more VRAM.

      The PS4 CPU was a joke, but it could use a lot of textures.

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      It really depends on whether you want the newest games with 128k graphics. I game on a 5 year old Thinkpad* and a first gen switch and am happy about it.

      *granted, it was refurbished and still like 2700€, but the same laptop would be cheaper today

    • rafoix@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Wasn’t that just around the second half of the PS360 generation and the PS4 era until crypto blew up?

      PCs were always pretty expensive since my childhood in the 1980s.

    • Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Having a noctua cooler and an insulated case will go a long way, especially if you don’t need to think about possible leakages

    • CucumberFetish@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Depends. For performance? Not really. For sound? Definitely. Unless you go for one of those passive air cooled PC cases (15+ kg of aluminum and no fans), you won’t get anything that is quieter than a liquid cooler with a 360mm rad. With a custom loop and a GPU water block you can get your PC to essentially silent.

    • Atropos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nah, I’ve always air cooled. I’d rather have a chonky cooler instead of yet another failure point.

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not really. Outside of the commercial usage (like data centers), liquid-cooing is used more just for show.

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I swear even back in the liquid cooling heyday of 2005 it still wasn’t worth it. If you could afford liquid cooling, you could afford a case and a mobo with more fans

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m certain you can build a $15K USD computer, I bet Linus Tech Tips does it regularly, but idk who tf is doing that when an nVidia 3090Ti is only $1080 and is ranked #23 on PassMark.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yes, and if you’re genuinely spending $15,000 on a rig you are not competing with a goddamn Playstation; at that point you’re either mixing it with low end datacenters or you’ve now got a ziggurat of monitors on your desk that could backdrop a Daft Punk concert. I just built a pretty much top of the line (AMD based, mind you) machine a few months ago for under $3000. I could have gotten away with less, but I didn’t feel like it.

      I suspect that many morons with nothing but decades-old experience, if even any to begin with, still have no comprehension of just how cheap computers are.

    • cabb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why are you considering buying a 3090 Ti for $1080??? It’s an old card and shouldn’t be near that amount when you can get better performance for less money out of a 9070 xt or 5070 ti.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I built my friend a cheap gaming PC. If your target is 60fps 1080 its dirt cheap. The 3060 still handles modern titles and its a few hundred. Amd and Intel also have great budget offerings. 9060 and b580 are great cards.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I actually went with a 3080 that had more VRAM than the Ti version at the cost of slightly lower performance, but this unintentionally crashes some games and applications which are not made to handle more than the 4GB memory limit in some 32 bit softwares. It’s too powerful lmao. Someday we’re going to encounter a similar issue when cards regularly reach up to 64GB VRAM.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    The consoles are “cheap” because the controllers, games, and subscription services are expensive.

    It’s far, far, far cheaper to game on a PC in the long run. You can buy a pc capable of playing many games for as little as $300 (gmtek or similar micro pc sporting high performance amd cpu). If you want better graphics, you plug a gpu into that for $260 or so (Radeon 9060).

    Steam is crazy cheap. Multiple sales a year, and if you don’t like a game you can get a full refund. Free AAA games every week as well from GOG, Epic, and rarely but surely, also Steam.

    • Druid@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’ll second this, actually. I used to hate on PC gaming for around a decade or so because it always seemed to prohibitively expensive to me compared to a console. But after building my very first PC with used parts off ebay for around 300-400€ in total, I think, I can confirm that it works really well overall.

      Most of the games I’ve played so far perform really well, some even play on highest settings (and that’s with just a 1080 ti), and it’s a PC, so multitasking, office work, homework and whatnot are all possible. Running the OS and games off an SSD makes loading times quite fast compared to the PS5’s SSD, sometimes even faster.

      And I haven’t spent a single Euro on games because of a plethora of 🏴‍☠️ options, which is possible on console depending on the console, but ultimately hinges on jailbreaking your console and voiding a potential warranty.

      Overall, I’m very pleased with my PC experience right now. Ever since building the PC, I haven’t played on console, and that’s coming from someone who was playing on console pretty much exclusively since around 2017

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      My Xbox and PlayStation both came with a full normal controller, and console games are constantly on sale. I have absolutely no idea what you’re trying to get at here.

      The point of the submission is that PC dumbfucks don’t know how to compare apples to apples. Console gaming is objectively superior due to the benefits of things like warranty, consistency, drivers, software, etc.

      • smoker@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ah yes, all the benefits of having the privilege to pay $10 a month to play online, only have enough storage space for like 5 games with no expansion options, barred access to the vast majority of games, and limited options for voice chat and input devices.

        But I guess if you’re like 12 and all you play is 2k/madden/fifa/maybe COD and your parents are paying for it then it’s probably fine.

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Software and driver issues like clicking update? Waiting for a reboot?

        The same one year warranty that your PC has?

      • drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        A controller is like 20 bucks. My PC can play the vast majority of games ever made out of the box, and for free if I’m willing to commit some crimes.