What’s great about this, and Stephen Fry is brilliant, is not that he’s absolving Musk, or that he’s criticizing Tesla, but that it is an argument likely leading to Elon Musk protesting,

‘No, my cars are good enough that I can be a Nazi!’

  • comfy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Headlines are being headlines, I get it, but Fry was repeating a joke:

    “I heard a very good joke yesterday,” the QI host, 67, told Stig Abell on Times Radio on Thursday.

    “Someone said, ‘Musk is not a Nazi… Nazis made really good cars,’” he went on, before bursting out laughing.

  • droplet6585@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Hur hur. I’d wish people would stop assigning hyper-competence to Nazis. They never were. Hitler was a drug addict and the trains didn’t run on time.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Hitler was a drug addict and the trains didn’t run on time.

      German trains still don’t run on time. Can’t blame that one on the Nazis, that’s just a German thing.

        • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I had four long distance ICE journeys in the last two months. Three where thirty minutes late, one was two hours late.

          Also had four long distance TGV journeys, of which one was about 20 minutes late, and one was an hour late, though that delay happened in Germany.

          Apparently, DB is currently working on the infrastructure, but those renovations haven’t been fully funded, and it looks like the conservatives will get in next.

    • Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Exactly this. My grandmother lived under the Nazis and she said they were fucking idiots. Exactly the same type of incompetent blowhards. The whole hyper scientific ubermensch BS in the cultural zeitgeist is so frustrating. I blame all the WWII video games and movies that played up the myth to have more interesting villains than the sleazy shit stains that they actually were.

      • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        The strength of the Germans was that I.) they had a really good industrial base, and ii.) the traditions within the army meant they had extremely well trained soldiers. Both of these predate nazi-rule. For instance, Germans also arguably had the best (equipped) army in WW1.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      6 hours ago

      A small country took on the ENTIRE FUCKING WORLD (TWICE) and very nearly won. The second time with a lunatic at the helm.

      What does it take to impress you? To what would you assign their disturbing success?

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        At no point did they “nearly win” against the world. In World War 1 they made desperate attempts to break out of trench warfare because the blockade was obliterating their wartime economy. In World War 2 they were cooked the second they invaded the USSR and the USA landed in the UK. Those were unwinnable areas for them. Even if they eventually managed to wear down the British, the Americans were right behind them manufacturing 100 tanks a day and 15 Aircraft Carriers in 1943 alone. Which means all of those tanks are getting to the European theater.

        And once the USSR got it’s production under way the Germans were on the defensive all the way back to Berlin.

      • droplet6585@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Small country? They were a highly industrialized, highly educated and still quite materially wealthy colonial power going into the wars. They didn’t need to be competent. Enough people went along with them and there was plenty of residual wealth to burn on the war machine.

        You don’t need to be an architect to burn down a building.

      • Sonori@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Do Japan and Italy just not count as part of the world? I mean Japan took over half of Asia and the Pasific while Italy took the Mediterranean countries. Germany took over part of northern Europe and helped a bit of North Africa.

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Still a Nazi.

    Just America shrinkflated Nazism so the intelligence had to go. Still 100% of the hate and malice America loves to eat though.

    • Orbituary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Yes. He’s still a Nazi. You’re not getting the point.

      Fry is trying to provoke Musk into saying, “yes, they’re good enough,” turning it an admission that he is indeed a Nazi.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I would describe Elon Musk as an autistic adult whose weird behavior patterns and way too much money are dangerous in a system that gives money way too much power.

    edit: just to be clear to the angry arrow smashers, I’m not offering excuses, rationalizations or support for Elon Musk, just a purely clinical view of his behavior, and why it’s so dangerous that our system gives so much power to money. Without the influence his billions give him he would be just another annoying weird guy. Some people would probably even feel some sympathy for him if it didn’t carry the risk of being called Evil.