Photoshop was for 20 years ago. There were automated tools by the late 2010s. Results were mixed, I threw a picture of Trump in and then threw up.

4chan has been doing this for like a decade, why only now is it getting attention?

I assume it’s for yet another push to restrict access to even more of the internet.

Why bother? Wtf would I even use?

You are at work for usually 8-9 hours a day. Some games require so little attention you can play while at work. Like EVE Online mining could be optimised to only giving a control input a few times an hour. Isk/h would be shit, but it’s not zero.

Is that it? What is even the point then.

Isn’t political reaction content just pushing hate?

Not sure if the algorithm for scaled could be better to try and find new communities, otherwise I usually check hot/subscribed first which helps filter it.

Maybe, if they are not just playing the entire video end to end and barely talking over it.

If you are taking 5 minutes of their video and turn it into an hour of review/criticism, sure that seems fair.

As long as your basic needs are met, being happy is then just a skill issue.

Well it seems like currently they are just pirating content from small creators that don’t have legal teams to defend themselves. If its actually ok do it with Disney.

Pretty sure pasting your face over it doesn’t count though, surely? Otherwise I have a new piracy idea

It’s a way of stealing someone else’s content and for some reason YouTube allows it. I close that slop immediately.

Not sure how popular the guardian is in Norfolk

Someone can be very physically attractive to you and you can simultaneously not want to date them.

Yep, talk to a 10/10, then opens her mouth saying she wants to vote for Trump and completely flaccid. I suspect the reverse also happens.

I don’t like it and its a fair part of why I shop in Aldi instead, they don’t do it.

Oh so now you care about displaced people when its impacting Americans?

Pretty sure its the asteroid belt, not planetary rings, that you don’t really need to think about when passing through.

And yeah, it shouldn’t be too hard and yet look at all the junk already up there. Hopefully they can just be required to keep to very low orbits that decay rapidly.

And how much space junk will end up there? Cleaning up afterwards costs more money and long term thinking isn’t something shareholders care about over more profit today.

The tech is interesting, hopefully governments across the entire planet regulate it well enough. Although at the same time, its not like we really need to care either. In our lifetime its not like any of us are likely to be able to afford to go to space anyway, but it would probably be a good idea not to ruin it if we have a choice.

IIRC it depends on how you count it, if you are counting water use for hydro power then it uses shitloads. But places that use hydro usually have plenty of water to do that in the first place and any other datacentre would be the same, AI isn’t special. Any kind of factory would also use a lot.

Yeah, how much is enough? The answer does vary a lot by where you live too. But it is interesting hearing people with 5x my income in the same country complain having no money left each month. Meanwhile I have always been doing fine even on minimum wage.