Ever since I graduated, everywhere I’ve worked has been 8-5. My current company is going to soon start expecting us to be in 7-5.

How many of you here work a 9-5 with a paid lunch?

Productivity keeps going up but so do working hours.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I saw a law office once in the early 2000s that was 9-5. And the entire office shut down for an hour, while they all had lunch together in the conference room. The phones all went to voicemail and everything. I was working on replacing a few of their computers that day. They made me stop and join them. Seemed like a great place to work.

  • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Most high-skill jobs (e.g. software dev, engineering, research, higher education) are usually flexible with time. No one really cares when you come or go as long as you get the work done. People (read, good-for-nothing management people) are trying to make some of these more time-bound, but it’s usually counter-productive. Turns out when you want creativity from someone, you need to give them some freedom.

    • IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Technically I come in at 7 and leave at 4:30, but it’s a 9 hour day (30 min unpaid lunch) and I get every other Friday off in exchange. Also most days I work from home. No way in heck I’d ever go in for something like that.

      OP, start job shopping. Longer hours are a sign the business isn’t doing all that well and they’re trying to squeeze out some more labor. Or a sign they’re doing well but are not interested in taking care of people by hiring enough staff and would rather you burn yourself out.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    I worked at one company that was 7am-5pm for corporate office work. The company grew from a small retail parts company decades ago, but never changed the mindset. So even the office work was treated like shift work. Office workers wouldn’t even check email before 7am. Many times just hanging out in the cafeteria until 7 on the dot when they had to be at their desks. Further as soon as 5pm hit exactly, all the office workers would drop what they were doing and walk out to the parking lot with all of the other blue collar shift workers.

    This resulted in things like Purchase Orders getting delayed by a day because it arrived at the approver at 5:01pm and the approver was gone. There was nearly no weekend office work, which caused its own problems.

    It was such a strange place to work.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    If you aren’t getting a paid lunch and two 15-minute breaks during your 8-hour shift, your employer is stealing from you.

    • tyrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve never had a paid lunch. 2 paid 15 min breaks and then unpaid lunch is the law where I am.

      • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        my dumbass state has no requirements for breaks at all. one of my jobs has no official breaks. we’ve all mastered the art of looking busy while eating 💀

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Unless you are salaried. Being salaried normally comes with flexibility but gives no guarantees for breaks and number of hours worked.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        That works both ways. If you’re salaried and find yourself averaging more than 40 hours a week (including lunch/breaks), don’t.

        • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sadly 32-40 hour weeks excluding breaks is what you get paid here (NL, Europe)

          So if you get paid 40 hours a week, they expect you to average 45 including breaks. You get paid 40, though.

          It’s really shitty IMO

      • mxcory@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        There are two types of salary, exempt and non-exempt (from overtime pay). If I am remembering correctly, you basically have to be management to not get overtime pay. Something like being over at least 2 people and having input on major decisions. May have been more to it.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You have to be either management or highly-compensated (which means fuck-all, since the dollar amount tied to it never got updated for inflation). That’s why a lot of non-management tech workers (for example) are salaried exempt, and should therefore walk out whenever they’re told to work more than 40 hours/week (including lunch and breaks).

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m technically 9-5, though I can choose 7 to 3 or 8 to 4 if I want. I usually work 7-4 and take extra breaks throughout the day (or a really long lunch). Granted, I work for a non-profit which has a LOT less bullshit to deal with. I also have the option to work 7-5 or 8-6 if I want to only work 4 days a week. Flex time is an amazing fringe benefit.

    Outside of salaried jobs, I haven’t seen anywhere mandate 7-5 schedules for hourly employees (unless it’s a 4 day work week). Companies do not like paying overtime, so most I’ve dealt with will send you home the moment you hit 40 hours.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Flex time was one of the best parts of working in government. Being able to craft basically any schedule so long as it was 40 hours and not more than 10/day was really useful.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Flex time alone was worth the pay cut I took when I went corporate to non-profit. You can’t buy time, but flex time is the next best thing.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Salaried employment exists, and there are more jobs out there than they want you to think. The employer-employee relationship is a constant negotiation, and you’re always free to walk away.

    We don’t know how much time we have on earth, and you’re selling some of it in exchange for money.

    They are going to keep pushing to get more of your life from you, and you need to push back to keep as much as possible.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    Many of my jobs in software have been a sort of 10 to 6 schedule. Most of them have been pretty flexible about that so long as you attended all the required meetings and got your work done.

  • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    I have never been 9-5 with paid lunch and I’ve been in corporate world since 1998. 8-5 with an unpaid hour.

  • Dandroid@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    I have a 9-5 job as a software engineer. Though really I can stop working whenever I’m done with my assigned work. I usually stop around 3 or 3:30.

    • Phunter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Same. I am available 9 - 5, but I tend to be actually working 10 - 4. It fluctuates depending on how badly management wants things. And of course there’s the rotating on call schedule where sometimes I have to wake up in the middle of the night to confirm that a service my team owns is impacted by some other service’s outage. FUN!

  • 3ntranced@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Was literally going to ask this same question last week. Past three employers are expecting 8-5 m-f but only pay 40 hours.

    I’ve just been coming in at 6 before the boss to look like a hardworking then leave at 2 so I only work what I’m paid.

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s because you get a 1 hour lunch break. I would make sure to spend 60 minutes a day eating lunch.

  • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m on 9 to 4:30 with half an hour lunch. Or I could do anything from 6 - 1:30 to 9:30 - 5.
    And yes, I get paid for a full time job.
    Unions are awesome.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sure, just depends on the business. Self-employed and small business are often much more flexible. I pretty much work 9:30 to 4:30.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m fully remote, with no clock to punch, but with co-workers all over the world. I try to focus most of my hours between 9 and 5, but don’t sweat it too much because a few times a month I need to be on a call at 5 in the morning or 10 at night.

    There is simply no good time to schedule meetings with someone 12 hours away.