

I got an MS in a STEM field and wasn’t able to buy a house until I was 36, supervising multiple employees, and married to someone who also contributed.


I got an MS in a STEM field and wasn’t able to buy a house until I was 36, supervising multiple employees, and married to someone who also contributed.
How the fuck is Kid fucking Rock still relevant in any way? I thought he would have just disappeared into obscurity after the 90s ended. Do some people actually still give this guy their money for some reason?
Edit: How the hell does the “ba with the ba with the bang da bang diggy diggy - diggy said the boogie said up drop the boogie” guy have eleven studio albums? And who the hell are the 5.3M monthly listeners on Spotify? This blows my mind!
I always see “did not find”
Removing doubt will defuse so many future arguments. I definitely see how being asked for a paternity test could hurt but it’s a temporary hurt. Uncertainty could cause long-term hurt and damage any chance of relationships developing in a positive way.
While pettiness sounds awesome here, I’d argue against it. She may need to deal with these people for 18 years or more, depending on how the situation proceeds. Being petty now could lead to long-term animosity that is unneeded.
I say give them the paternity test, see how they react, then get petty if they continue being shitty.
I agree with you on the stainless. I do still have one cast iron pan that I swear by for certain things but I also don’t baby it in any way. I also have a couple of ceramic coated pans for specific things that love to stick to stainless. I mostly use the stainless and the cast iron, though.


That’s a super smart strategy. It reduces the amount of thinking required and speeds up your ability to answer.


It’s more about which study or source you’re looking at than what measure is used. It’s tough to estimate stuff like this so different people get different answers.


As I keep telling people, they’re not upset about it because their media aren’t telling them about things like this, at least not in the same terms.


Here’s a really interesting article on how it was discovered that citrus would help. They were also able to preserve citrus and citrus juice with alcohol. They could also turn it into a concentrated syrup without too much loss of vitamin C.
From what I just read, they didn’t do this, but dried citrus, when dried at a cool temperature, retains the majority of its vitamin C.


A lot of the other light patches in this image are city lights.


I don’t think the rapper was even criticizing them. I think he was literally singing their praises.


I get why they’d use something like this to save money and time but, is suspect that correct use would include a human check before charging people.
We need to start pushing for laws on this kind of thing. Automated checks are fine if you, as the company, trust they won’t have too many false negatives. If you aren’t checking for false positives, though, you should be heavily fined for each false report. $25,000 per false report sounds like a good place to start. Hopefully that would be large enough to not just be the cost of doing business.


I don’t remember which phone, but one of mine had an rgb led that could be set to blink different colors for different apps. I really miss that!


This is what we need! Less science, more militarized law enforcement!


Ad a fairly senior developer, I’m not at all surprised. AI speeds me up in some circumstances like writing boilerplate; things like kubernetes manifests. It does not speed up my coding, but it does help me explore options, expand my knowledge, and point me down the right track on new methods and packages. It also lets me do things I wouldn’t normally bother with, but which are good practice like finding edge cases for unit tests, packaging for multiple architectures, writing scripts to profile my code, etc.
Essentially, I’m likely slower writing code with AI assistance but I think the code is higher quality because it let’s me quickly assess many options and implement best practices that are normally tedious to implement manually.
I almost never accept code AI has written without modification, but I think I gain a lot from its use.


I don’t think so. I think they’ll either use it for very benign tasks or they’ll get a LOT of people killed.
You know, I get it, they’re probably just an asshole. Maybe they’re having an emergency, though. How about just letting them get around in case there is a good reason for driving recklessly? Or maybe just in case they’re nuts enough to make things violent?
Spell checking for this comment coming to you from Microsoft