• dmention7@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The one thing Krispy Kreme has going for them is if you can get them fresh and warm, they are pretty damn good, and they generally make them fresh all day. But at least in my area, what they did is open a handful of locations where you could get them freshly-made, let those build some hype for a year or two, then close them down and sell the pre-packaged garbage in grocery stores and gas stations.

      IMO they are still generally better than whatever other basic glazed donuts you can buy off the store shelf, but if there’s a local bakery that sells fresh donuts though, 10/10 they will be better than Krispy Kreme.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Mobile UI. It sucks. Yet the majority of people online are now connecting from it, and everything wants to be an app.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Apps can collect all your data from your phone whereas a website doesn’t have access to your GPS location, etc necessarily.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Web3. Doesn’t make sense. The internet is already supposed to be decentralised.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    AI, the only people hyped about it are corporate heads, and people trying to get into the industry via grad school pipeline.

    hyping content creator as the goal for younger people to become? these people arnt really good models to follow and you hear them get into some kind of drama and find out they are pos: sniperwolf, mr beast, siderman. also liek to mention most current creators are often rich/come from wealth themselves, so it doesnt help people who arnt as rich as they are.

    and then people still defending PEWPEWDIE? why are people still trying to give his previous support of bigotry a pass, just because he had a child now.

  • RexWrexWrecks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Nirvana. The band.

    I missed the grunge movement in its peak but I got into Pearl Jam and Soundgarden. Just couldn’t get into Nirvana beyond a few songs that I do like. Musically, I feel like both Pearl Jam and Soundgarden dwarf Nirvana.

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Nirvana was ok. They are the ones credited with killing the hair metal genre.

      But honestly Alice in Chains, Soundgarden, and Stone Temple Pilots…they are all 10 times better than Nirvana ever was.

    • IngeniousRocks (They/She) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Having read Kurt’s journals, they wanted to be mid. They were capitalizing on the success of other bands and implementing their styles. They weren’t trying to change the world, they just wanted to get paid to make decent music

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      When an artist is the first to inspire a movement, history tends to look back on them differently. There’s a related trope that covers this phenomenon - “Seinfeld is Unfunny.” From that page:

      There are certain works that you can safely assume most people have enjoyed. These shows were considered fantastic when they were released. Now, however, these have a Hype Backlash curse on them. Whenever we watch them, we’ll cry, “That is so old” or “That is so overdone”.

      The sad irony? It wasn’t old or overdone when they did it, because they were the first ones to do it. But the things it created were so brilliant and popular, they became woven into the fabric of that work’s niche. They ended up being taken for granted, copied, and endlessly repeated. Although they often began by saying something new, they in turn became the new status quo.

      Nirvana is one of the artists mentioned under the “Music” examples on that same page. The point is, they were groundbreaking when they came out, but they changed the music scene so much and have inspired so many similar artists that their original work has become overshadowed by the successors they helped create.

      Your experience is common and it’s okay not to enjoy their music, but the key to remember is that without Nirvana helping to pave the way, other grunge bands may not have risen to the popular level they reached.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I respect Nirvana tremendously for the movement they ushered in. I cannot enjoy most of their music, however.

      Foo fighters is a bit better, but I admit I pick and choose.

    • PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Bleach and Incesticide weren’t particularly good albums. Generic rock pulp, the songs were interchangeable.
      EIDT: I’d argue it’s their live shows that made them stand out. “Live and Loud” electrified me to no end.

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Watching sports. Playing them, I get. Watching? Never cared for it.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s fun seeing someone do something with Incredible skill /or great athleticism. Doesn’t need to be sport per se performance art like acrobatics or artistry e.g. Bob Ross have similar aspects.

      Some sports I like to watch I have personally partaken in, in that way I can more appreciate the skill needed by the professionals.

      Some sports I don’t know at all but I like to figure out the rules by watching and discovering what makes a great play (American Football is in that category for me).

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      Same reason some people are into watching video games, talent shows or even actors.

      There’s loads of interest to be found in spectating a skilled display of any activity if you truly engage with it IMO.

      I sometimes watch sports I’ve barely got a grasp of the rules for just out of fascination. GAA hurling is the most recent one I can recall getting sucked into for an afternoon.

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are dozens of us!

      My country pretty much lives hockey, so people don’t even ask whether you watch, it’s assumed you do, so they’ll ask stuff like “that match yesterday was awesome, right?” or directly reference something that happened in said match and then look at you like their mind can’t comprehend someone doesn’t watch hockey.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I can watch sports I don’t play. Like football(both American type and what we call soccer), MMA(although I haven’t watched anything in years), basketball(but only NCAA), hockey, the occasional baseball game. I’ll make an exception for boxing and tennis, those are watchable even when I was deep into them. But golf‽ How does anyone watch that? I get walking the greens, and hitting it every few minutes yourself, but watching someone else just seems so boring.

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I feel like this except for gymnastics, rythmic gymnastics, ice skating/dancing. Those are so entertaining.

  • cloudless@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Twitter or any “microblog”.

    I don’t understand why “following” a person/organisation would be interesting. I would rather follow a topic/community.

    • _thisdot@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You can do that. But certain voices carry extra weight within communities.

      I followed today’s Formula 1 race on both Threads and Mastodon. Both platforms allow you to follow topics and that’s what I did. But then I follow the people I find interesting as well

    • Today@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Agree. When I was on Twitter I followed local bars, restaurants, and music venues for info on events and happy hours. No humans.

  • Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Reality TV”. Could anythjng be more contrived yet obviously “make it up as you go along”?

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I can’t help but wonder how much the popularity of reality TV led us to where we are now. I don’t just mean how the US president used to have his own stupid show, but how many people grew up thinking that “watching people create drama” is peak entertainment.

      The same era saw the decline and demise of a number of educational channels and shows. Is it a coincidence? I don’t know. All I know is there are lots of adults who grew up watching “reality” shows who now think politics are just a game to “win” and that when their opponents are upset, it’s amusing. It’s like the concept of empathy or working together don’t even enter their minds. Everything is just for entertainment, no matter how serious it is or how many innocent people get screwed over by it.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s cheap to make. People watch other people at their packagable worst. That’s about it.

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    Vtubers. I get the cute anime girl thing and I like fan art of them as I do other anime. But the models move wayyyyyy to exaggerated. It hits uncanny valley for me.

    Also I don’t get the parasocial relationship of chatting in a huge room of other followers. The chat is scrolling by at a hundred miles an hour and you’re competing with everyone else for their attention.

    • junkthief@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I enjoy watching and chatting in smaller streams sometimes (like, a couple hundred in the chat at the MOST, usually < 100), it’s still parasocial, but tends to be WAY more chill. If it’s a stream with thousands of people, I don’t see the point in chatting, it’s passive entertainment at that point for me, personally!

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Supposedly vtubers need to make very exaggerated facial expressions irl in order to make sure the software picks it up and translates it onto the model, which is sometimes unsettling to people when they get in the habit of doing that normally.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s 100% uncanny valley for me as well. There’s a creator a like who doesn’t like to appear on camera much (most of their main content is animated) and wanted to watch their livestreams. They used an avatar and it just weirded me out. It doesn’t help that I’m seemingly way more sensitive than usual when it comes to audio and visuals being even slightly out-of-sync.