I have long attested that whatever sci fi can think up, humans will eventually create.

In b4 451 isnt SciFi

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      He waffled about what the book was really about. At first he said it was censorship. Later in life he said it was intended as a searing indictment of the looming cultural distraction of technology, most notably television according to his biographer Sam Weller.

      Which is wild considering he wrote scripts for the Twilight Zone and Alfred Hitchcock Presents, then had Ray Bradbury Theater in the 80s.

      • flicker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        5 months ago

        I always hated the obvious disdain with which the author treats a woman doing a teleplay in her own home.

        Acting is a skill, and recreation has value. If a person sitting in their own living room doing VR episodes of TV where they play a part, that doesn’t make them vapid or foolish or represent an unwise use of their time.

        I have watched movies that have had an equal lack of need of my input that still managed to make me think and feel you condescending prick! And I have read books with which I’ve had infinitely less intellectual involvement than a woman pretending to be a character in a soap opera! Take your elitist victimization fetish and shove it up your ass!

        …sorry, I actually love parts of Fahrenheit 451. But I’ve been angry about this for years. The “hero” of the story denigrating his own wife because of how he views her hobby? Because in his mind, it isn’t as intellectually stimulating as his new, illegal hobby? What an asshole.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          It is a shame, as what was really wrong with her wasn’t that she used escapism, but that she was apathetic. You can escape reality and relax, but there’s work to do if we want to contribute positively to the world. All mediums can pacify us from the horrors of the world. Books are slightly better by virtue of having a lower barrier to entry, but the internet lowered that potential barrier.

          • flicker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            The problem I had with this is that it’s an apathy that he himself had until recently, and now he’s a smug prick hating on his wife for not being cool enough to break the law like he does.

            He never tells her what he’s doing. He believes he can’t. So instead of trying to communicate, and dealing with the fallout of a difficult discussion, he just judges her for being who he was.

            It’s still a dick move no matter how it’s justified!

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Lots of the book is just “old man yells at cloud”, even though Bradbury wasn’t particularly old at the time. Not chronologically, anyway.

          I do think he made a good point about porches. Places where you hang out and invite your neighbors to just come by. Houses aren’t really made that way anymore; my house has a small concrete block out front that’s barely enough to fit two chairs comfortably. Setback requirements in zoning mean it’s legally impossible to add anything else, at least as the city zoning code stands right now.

          There’s a definite change in how my parents’ generation interacts with people compared to my generation. It was more normal just to drop by and talk, though perhaps with a phone call to check in first. My friends would consider that weird.

          • flicker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Oh! I’ve always lived more rurally, so I’m not familiar with the lack of porches in cities. That bites!

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Don’t want people knowing what it would look like before and during a book banning fascist political regime.

      You might notice the things in the book start happening here in the real world.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    5 months ago

    the first-ever flame-throwing quadruped robot dog

    A very competitive category, as we all know

  • groet@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ah yes the good old torment nexus from the hit novel “dont build the torment nexus”

  • (⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    this is what the company behind this says it’s useful for:

    Wildfire Control and Prevention
Agricultural Management
Ecological Conservation
Snow and Ice Removal
Entertainment and SFX

    first two sound pretty reasonable to me, as someone with a very basic understanding of wildfire control.
    snow and ice removal, i mean it’s definitely gonna do that but i can’t think of any place where it would be necessary to use a robot dog for it.
    the last one’s self explanatory.

    i’d love to be optimistic and say that this robot will only get used for harmless or good deeds but i know this thing is already being retrofitted by cops to shoot tear gas or some bullshit

  • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s a delightful PR gimmick by a most definitely not a tech company, since there’s not much cutting edge technology going on in the world of “flamethrowers are perfectly legal in America and that’s our business model”.

    In addition to strapping a flamethrower to a generic quadruped robot, they also strapped one to a drone.

  • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I mean… Humanity is pretty screwed as it is so why don’t we just turn into the skid and see how bad we can make things

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because “humanity” isn’t really screwed, just most members of humanity. I hate this assumption that climate catastrophe or nuclear war will be a certain end. No it won’t. Humans will survive, maybe even a large percentage of them. LIFE GOES ON.

      Maybe you want death because trying to improve things is “too hard,” but I want to live. I hold onto hope because life is more fulfilling that way. You’re just justifying apathy by assuming we’re all going to die when it’s actually unlikely to happen.

  • Crismus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    Now we just need a “Rat Thing”. That will solidify the world into a corporotacracy where the Liberterian ideal of Corporate Profits over everything and no pesky regulations to get in the way of profits.

    Bring on the Franchise Wars…

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m not remembering a mechanical dog in fahrenheit 451, but it’s been decades since I’ve read it…

    Also not at all worried about “footed” robots navigating the real world.

  • galoisghost@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    As an extra layer or irony this screen shot is a comment on a headline posted on a micro blogging platform.