same

That’s good to know

You were being reactionary, specifically about people memeing on somebody who secretly suppressed my entire main instance. I get posts feeling repetitive, but come on; what happened was fucked up. Blocking those people feels like you’re seeking the sanitized fediverse the Tesseract dev was seeking.

Scripted exception

Finally someone says it

less pathetic than trying to distract from all the bad feels with beans and corn

I have missed being able to downvote reactionary liberals like you

Silently silencing the biggest queer and leftist voices for a bunch of users is quite disturbing the more one thinks about it. What if other frontends secretly do the same thing? What if other open source devs secretly want to control your opinions and speech, influencing you without your knowledge or consent? This is a terrible precedent for the fediverse, and something we absolutely cannot tolerate unless we want it to happen again.

I expect nothing more creative from people who want only “light hearted dick jokes”

It said ragebait answers only ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

If it is a question of real life physics, then B would be correct

Yes!

I don’t think it’s a conspiracy, I just think many users have the same desire to avoid unpleasant feelings as the dev. Unfortunately, that just means they sit back and do nothing as most of the queer people are silenced.

It’s actually really upsetting and disgusting, but if I made a post fully expressing my frustration, they wouldn’t listen. They’d see it as too whiny, preachy, and rude. Then again, if that dev has added me to the list like I asked, they probably won’t see this post in the first place.

no 😔

You can’t place a portal on a moving surface in either game, so neither.

There’s something attractive about someone who can dominate you

I don’t even need to hear most of them out; I totally get it 😭

This is just text written anywhere. There’s an art to making yourself understood in different contexts.

GIMME!!!

“Neurodivergent” is a bit different though. The r-word says something normative about people’s mental development. It’s saying that the person has been prevented from being normal; that something is wrong with them. “Special needs” indicates that someone requires different resources than what is typical. Much like IQ when it was developed, it’s a way to sort people’s needs on an economic basis, which isn’t poorly intentioned. However, it still labels people by how we need certain things within our socioeconomic system.

Disorder classification systems like the DSM or ICD seek to normalize people, making sure we “function” in society. It measures us by a set of standards to ensure that we can live independently with our environment. It is very much defined by how society is structured; the environment of industrial capitalism. It doesn’t matter how fulfilling your life is, only that you are a functional cog.

“Neurodivergence” seeks to avoid the pathology based approach. It says nothing about us having disorders. It instead focuses on us as different and divergent from the norm, but not inherently ill because of who we are. It’s invariant to economic systems or cultural norms, only saying that we are different.