F12 should open the browser developer tools, one panel will be the network requests.

It could be the accepts header then… check if the request includes accetps: application/json

In my experience that is almost always the server returning an html error page.

Start with inspecting that actual response the first character is probably <. The rest of it is likely to be a “not found” or “internal server error” (being the most common) page.

Then look at logs…

I voted for Kang!

It’s one half of ‘bread and circuses’.

FU Dell BIOS and your F11 b/s.

It’s absolutely not my place to gatekeep feminism, but…

IMHO They’re not practicing feminism (defined as empowering women) the trans exclusion turns it into radical misandry (disempowering men) by excluding any trans people from their definition of women: they consider transfem and transmasc people as men.

I remember being at a bar… Queue out the door for the ladies, mens almost empty.

One of the girls in the queue said something like “I wish we could use the mens” as a comedy throwaway.

I said “do it, if you’re comfortable doing so, we don’t care”. I mean, there are still stalls with doors right?

Half a dozen very relieved ladies bolted for the mens.

I like to think I made some people’s evening just a little better that night.

“Uughh”

I meant extreme for this very specific case. If every other features of the product is satisfactory for OP then dumping the whole product is extreme.

No product is perfect in every way for every customer. Modifying a product that you’ve already bought is an entirely reasonable thing to do.

Returning it seems extreme to me… But I’m happy modding things like that.

Stick a piece of paper or card over the button/LED such that you can still depress it… Iterate/repeat until you’re satisfied.

Apostrophe catastrophe.

Oh, there are forks: #2.

Sounds about right.

Ah. I figured it was plausible enough to ask for a source rather than out right rejected as bullshit.

I see now that was a “got a source to back up that outlandish claim?”

Agreed. That it’s even plausible is a sad state of affairs.

It’s no less bat shit crazy than what we do have sources for.

If it’s just plaster, like a thing layer over brick, then there’s nothing to drive the nail into. It’s like trying to hammer into a concrete footpath.

Sounds like you’re a good candidate for the 3M sticky hooks.

IIRC I’m reasonably sure they all immediately regretted it.

Marriage is just a formality, with the government. So there’s probably very little benefit if your jurisdiction recognizes defacto relationships, if it doesn’t there are some advantages, but also jurisdiction dependent.

Weddings are 100% bullshit.

“Except for me, in my case it doesn’t count”