• manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Even in the 1960s eating a whole chicken would have been a luxury, this isn’t peasant food, that’s the gout inducing diet of a king

  • john_t@piefed.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “What is the charge? Eating a meal? A succulent chicken meal?”, “Get your hand off my baguette!”

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Soft white bread? Nobody but rich upper class people could afford soft white bread until well past the industrial revolution.

    That’s also a pretty large roasted bird that’s being eaten in complete absence of stew.

    • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Roast chicken on a nice crusty sourdough is amazing. Get some butter or gravy in there it’s a hell of a meal

  • Aeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If by “peasant” you mean “knight of the fucking round table” then yes

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    A few things to unpack here.

    • That chicken is roasted nicely, but I completely understand if that was bought in that condition at the grocer’s.
    • Plain bread is a travesty. it needs to be either toasted and/or you need some melted butter or gravy to sop up.
    • Pair this with some fruit or pan seared/roasted vegetables. Even microwaved beans would make this nutritious. Takes very little effort, very easy to do.
    • Even peasants had access to beer, ale, or home-made short-beer/kvass. Gotta calorie-max so you can work in the field tomorrow. Plus, the alcohol helps with the constant muscle-aches and fatigue from endless labor.

    There are innumerable ways to elevate this meal, but I’ll keep this comment short. Anyone, feel free to message me or reply here if you want tips for that.

    • edinbruh@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Plain bread is perfectly fine as long as it’s not one of those super dry breads

  • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 hours ago

    You’re eating like Final Fight.
    (Hits a trashcan)
    Roasted chicken.
    (Hits some tires)
    Bread.
    100% health let’s go!!!

  • CreativeShotgun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Am woman, would totally eat. Infact my dinner looks similar except my bread is liquid. And of course some broccoli and onions.

  • timestatic@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    A medieval peasant on a celebration day. I doubt they could eat a whole as chicken every day

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Depends on which era honestly. The medieval period lasted for nearly a thousand years and could vary about as much as one would expect, so for example a very well off peasant during the high medieval period maybe could have eaten a whole ass chicken for a while at least. Probably wouldn’t have though, at least not without turning it into soup or a sandwich equivalent.

    • DrivebyHaiku@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah communally like a couple times a year if lucky and most likely spent hens or cockrels not this monstrosity of a broiler meat bred bird.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      15 hours ago

      King Richard I was once captured for ransom while traveling undercover trough Austria.

      His cover was blown specifically because he tried ordering a roast chicken.

      There are a few variations of the details in this story though, a peasant could definitely have owned a chicken and eaten it when it died but it was probably way more valuable to sell it.

    • Denjin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Doubtful, most common meal for peasants would have been a sort of stew of vegetables and oats called pottage.

      A whole chicken would have been prohibitively expensive either to purchase or in lost money from sale at market, same for pork or beef.

      Fish though would be plentiful and cheap and a valuable source of protein. Oysters were considered peasant food until pretty much the 20th century.

      Wheat bread similarly would have been a rare luxury, especially made from refined white flour, rye and buckwheat, roughly ground would be far more common.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      A roasted bird? Why not? Y’all are making assumptions that this is a chicken and the peasant a small farmer but why not a traveling mime trapping pigeons from the square?