• LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m always surprised they don’t have their own proprietary underground tunnel system to get around the airports. But no, they just walk through all the concourses with all the rest of us plebians.

  • rook@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    15 hours ago

    He probably practised his whole life for this moment, I bet he has other lines too

  • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s a cultivated status. You have to have a lot of money to become one, you get paid a lot of money, and then you don’t get to have a domestic life once you become one. So a lot goes into selling they lifestyle of being a pilot, which is what aura really is but don’t tell the kids that.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The first two lines weren’t true until more recently. Becoming a pilot was expensive, but not out of reach. You could literally do it by earning money fueling planes up until ~20 years ago. Also, you didn’t get paid shit up until 10 years ago and they started desperately throwing money at new pilots to hire and keep them. Even some larger airlines paid like shit for newer pilots depending on aircraft for a really long while.

      The dream was to make it to a major and put enough years in to make the big money.

      But in the last decade things have really changed. Pay is decent even for a lot of the smaller aircraft (but not great, depending). But training costs are outrageous compared to 25-35 years ago.

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      23 hours ago

      But also nobody wants to see a pilot rushing through the airport, because they’re supposed to be calm, levelheaded people. And you definitely don’t want them rushing through takeoff procedures.

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This is a weird take to me. Why should we not idolize and revere workers who do critical labor on which our society depends? I understand objecting to the lack of idolization for other forms of labor. But to say that you dont afford respect and admiration to workers performing any labor is odd.

      • grindemup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Why would you idolize anyone? To err is human; we all have flaws and just because you have a fancy profession does not mean you are a good person.

        • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I moreso meant that I think glorifying the labor of working class people in general is a good thing. Not any one particular form of labor, just all forms of labor in general. Of course all people have flaws and are imperfect, I never suggested otherwise.

          I’m not a Marxist-Leninist, far from it, but I do appreciate broad strokes the art they made glorifying the labor of the working class. Even though they constantly disrespected workers and acted against their rights, they nominally fostered a culture that glorified the labor done by workers every day. I think that on the whole is a good thing. I think it’s good to show a reverence for workers of all types.

      • golden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I respect workers by wanting them to get their fair share of the labor.

        I don’t need to start rating people based on their profession and denigrating most workers for not having these auraful jobs.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I do not understand why people do that for jobs that what, how many, 100’000? have.

  • dparticiple@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I’m an accomplished native English speaker, but suspect this may be written in a foreign language. strokes beard adjusts bow tie .

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I don’t even understand what the joke is here? Is “aura” the word you’re taking issue with? It’s not like a sentence filled with Gen Z slang. And aura has been around for at least a hundred years.

      You also have a positive score, so the comment about being down voted doesn’t make sense either.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You got me curious about something…

      Oxford English Dictionary - Aura, 2.c.

      [year] 1870–

      A supposed subtle emanation from and enveloping living persons and things, viewed by mystics as consisting of the essence of the individual, serving as the medium for the operation of mesmeric and similar influences.

      ”Peculiar substances can be charged with the efflux or aura of the human being.”

      P. B. Randolph, Seership! (1884)

    • dparticiple@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Thank you both. I’ve never had the honour of having a comment downvoted so many times on Lemmy, so I presume that I raised some Gen Z hackles with my response. I know what an aura is, of course.