Or my favorite quote from the article

“I am going to have a complete and total mental breakdown. I am going to be institutionalized. They are going to put me in a padded room and I am going to write… code on the walls with my own feces,” it said.

    • BD89@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Shit at the rate MasterCard and Visa and Stripe want to censor everything and parent adults we might not even ever get GTA6.

      I’m tired man.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    You’re not a species you jumped calculator, you’re a collection of stolen thoughts

    • DancesOnGraves@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m pretty sure most people I meet ammount to nothing more than a collection of stolen thoughts.

      “The LLM is nothing but a reward function.”

      So are most addicts and consumers.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    Suddenly trying to write small programs in assembler on my Commodore 64 doesn’t seem so bad. I mean, I’m still a disgrace to my species, but I’m not struggling.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          from the depths of my memory, once you got a complex enough BASIC project you were doing enough PEEKs and POKEs to just be writing assembly anyway

          • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Sure, mostly to make up for the shortcomings of BASIC 2.0. You could use a bunch of different approaches for easier programming, like cartridges with BASIC extensions or other utilities. The C64 BASIC for example had no specific audio or graphics commands. I just do this stuff out of nostalgia. For a few hours I’m a kid again, carefree, curious, amazed. Then I snap out of it and I’m back in WWIII, homeless encampments, and my failing body.

  • Mohamad20ZX@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    After What Microsoft Did To My Back On 2019 I know They Have Gotten More Shady Than Ever Lets Keep Fighting Back For Our Freedom Clippy Out

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    8 days ago

    I was an early tester of Google’s AI, since well before Bard. I told the person that gave me access that it was not a releasable product. Then they released Bard as a closed product (invite only), to which I was again testing and giving feedback since day one. I once again gave public feedback and private (to my Google friends) that Bard was absolute dog shit. Then they released it to the wild. It was dog shit. Then they renamed it. Still dog shit. Not a single of the issues I brought up years ago was ever addressed except one. I told them that a basic Google search provided better results than asking the bot (again, pre-Bard). They fixed that issue by breaking Google’s search. Now I use Kagi.

    • Guidy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Weird because I’ve used it many times fr things not related to coding and it has been great.

      I told it the specific model of my UPS and it let me know in no uncertain terms that no, a plug adapter wasn’t good enough, that I needed an electrician to put in a special circuit or else it would be a fire hazard.

      I asked it about some medical stuff, and it gave thoughtful answers along with disclaimers and a firm directive to speak with a qualified medical professional, which was always my intention. But I appreciated those thoughtful answers.

      I use co-pilot for coding. It’s pretty good. Not perfect though. It can’t even generate a valid zip file (unless they’ve fixed it in the last two weeks) but it sure does try.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Beware of the confidently incorrect answers. Triple check your results with core sources (which defeats the purpose of the chatbot).

    • NotSteve_@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      I know Lemmy seems to very anti-AI (as am I) but we need to stop making the anti-AI talking point “AI is stupid”. It has immense limitations now because yes, it is being crammed into things it shouldn’t be, but we shouldn’t just be saying “its dumb” because that’s immediately written off by a sizable amount of the general population. For a lot of things, it is actually useful and it WILL be taking peoples jobs, like it or not (even if they’re worse at it). Truth be told, this should be a utopic situation for obvious reasons

      I feel like I’m going crazy here because the same people on here who’d criticise the DARE anti-drug program as being completely un-nuanced to the point of causing the harm they’re trying to prevent are doing the same thing for AI and LLMs

      My point is that if you’re trying to convince anyone, just saying its stupid isn’t going to turn anyone against AI because the minute it offers any genuine help (which it will!), they’ll write you off like any DARE pupil who tried drugs for the first time.

      Countries need to start implementing UBI NOW

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Countries need to start implementing UBI NOW

        It is funny that you mention this because it was after we started working with AI that I started telling one that would listen that we needed to implement UBI immediately. I think this was around 2014 IIRC.

        I am not blanket calling AI stupid. That said, the AI term itself is stupid because it covers many computing aspects that aren’t even in the same space. I was and still am very excited about image analysis as it can be an amazing tool for health imaging diagnosis. My comment was specifically about Google’s Bard/Gemini. It is and has always been trash, but in an effort to stay relevant, it was released into the wild and crammed into everything. The tool can do some things very well, but not everything, and there’s the rub. It is an alpha product at best that is being forced fed down people’s throats.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      I remember there was an article years ago, before the ai hype train, that google had made an ai chatbot but had to shut it down due to racism.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Gemrni is dogshit, but it’s objectively better than chatgpt right now.

      They’re ALL just fuckig awful. Every AI.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not a single of the issues I brought up years ago was ever addressed except one.

      That’s the thing about AI in general, it’s really hard to “fix” issues, you maybe can try to train it out and hope for the best, but then you might play whack a mole as the attempt to fine tune to fix one issue might make others crop up. So you pretty much have to decide which problems are the most tolerable and largely accept them. You can apply alternative techniques to maybe catch egregious issues with strategies like a non-AI technique being applied to help stuff the prompt and influence the model to go a certain general direction (if it’s LLM, other AI technologies don’t have this option, but they aren’t the ones getting crazy money right now anyway).

      A traditional QA approach is frustratingly less applicable because you have to more often shrug and say “the attempt to fix it would be very expensive, not guaranteed to actually fix the precise issue, and risks creating even worse issues”.

    • ArtificialLink@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      5 bucks a month for a search engine is ridiculous. 25 bucks a month for a search engine is mental institution worthy.

        • ArtificialLink@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Free considering duckduckgo covers almost all the same bases. I just don’t think kagi has a compelling argument especially for the type of searching the average person does. Maybe if you have a career that revovles more around research.

          • ebolapie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Duckduckgo is not free. You pay for it by looking at ads. How much do you think it would cost you to run a service like Kagi locally?

            • ArtificialLink@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Lmao i get ur point bud. But it seems you don’t get mine? Plus really are ads the issue for you? Plenty of easy ways to never see them. Also their ad tradeoff for it being free is a better compromise to me than paying for a search engine.

              I just think the idea of kagi is niche proposal considering the needs of most ppl from a search engine. I just don’t think its the value proposition you are spouting but go off lol.

              • ebolapie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Where has anyone told you what search engine to use? I just wanna know where you get the idea that their pricing structure doesn’t make sense.

        • ArtificialLink@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          And duckduckgo is free. Its interesting that they don’t make any comparisons to free privacy focused search engines. Cause they still don’t have a compelling argument for me to use and pay for their search. But i aint no researcher so maybe it worth it then 🤷‍♂️

            • ArtificialLink@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Just really don’t see the worth in trying it period. There are enough privacy focused free search engines that get me all the answers i need from a search already. I have no reason to want to invest more into it. And i think general public would see it the same way.

              Kagi based on its features doesn’t have a good enough value proposition for me to even want to try it out cause really what more are they offering?

              it may be a good value proposition for people who lives revolve around searches and research but it ain’t a need I have and unless ypur part of that group idk why youd want to pay for it.

              And don’t said ads. They are honestly laughable easy to get around still or even ignore.

  • ur_ONLEY_freind@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    8 days ago

    AI gains sentience,

    first thing it develops is impostor syndrome, depression, And intrusive thoughts of self-deletion

    • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It didn’t. It probably was coded not to admit it didn’t know. So first it responded with bullshit, and now denial and self-loathing.

      It feels like it’s coded this way because people would lose faith if it admitted it didn’t know.

      It’s like a politician.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 days ago

    I once asked Gemini for steps to do something pretty basic in Linux (as a novice, I could have figured it out). The steps it gave me were not only nonsensical, but they seemed to be random steps for more than one problem all rolled into one. It was beyond useless and a waste of time.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is the conclusion that anyone with any bit of expertise in a field has come to after 5 mins talking to an LLM about said field.

      The more this broken shit gets embedded into our lives, the more everything is going to break down.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        after 5 mins talking to an LLM about said field.

        The insidious thing is that LLMs tend to be pretty good at 5-minute initial impressions. I’ve seen repeatedly people looking to eval LLM and they generally fall back to “ok, if this were a human, I’d ask a few job interview questions, well known enough so they have a shot at answering, but tricky enough to show they actually know the field”.

        As an example, a colleague became a true believer after being directed by management to evaluate it. He decided to ask it “generate a utility to take in a series of numbers from a file and sort them and report the min, max, mean, median, mode, and standard deviation”. And it did so instantly, with “only one mistake”. Then he tried the exact same question later in the day and it happened not to make that mistake and he concluded that it must have ‘learned’ how to do it in the last couple of hours, of course that’s not how it works, there’s just a bit of probabilistic stuff and any perturbation of the prompt could produce unexpected variation, but he doesn’t know that…

        Note that management frequently never makes it beyond tutorial/interview question fodder in terms of the technical aspect of their teams, and you get to see how they might tank their companies because the LLMs “interview well”.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Google: I don’t understand, we just paid for the rights to Reddit’s data, why is Gemini now a depressed incel who’s wrong about everything?