

They ask Grok how they should feel about it.


They ask Grok how they should feel about it.


I’ve been to court, and it never even occurred to me that the lawyers are not placed under oath. But they’re the ones that do most of the talking during a case. I wonder that the reasoning for not being under oath is.


The problem with leaving Discord is convincing anybody else to join you, let alone an entire social circle. There are dozens of “better” messaging platforms I’ve signed up for where I never sent or received a single message because I had nobody to add.
It’s supposed to be a fee for convenience. However, their definition of “convenience” aren’t very convenient for me.


I think you may just be lucky. The McD’s in my area are still just as awful as they’ve always been.


That’s cool and all, but when can I buy RAM again?


Thanks for telling me what I believe in spite of me laying it out in plain English for you. I was confused for a minute there.


Yes, but what was left of it after killing third-party apps was basically just advanced search functions. Nothing in the API was still usable as far as browsing/posting.


I’m also largely against opt-out in other uses, too. The fact that this is AI only makes it that much worse.


… and it was turned on by default and had misleading language as to what the button actually does, yes.


I hope Elon has to spend a few billion to rebrand xAI now.


If it’s not an opt-IN feature, then it’s malicious, anti-consumer design. Full stop.
The lengths people will go to defend Mozilla are astounding. If Chrome did this, you’d be throwing a fit.


The fact that they announced that instead of an “AI ON switch” tells you where Mozilla’s interests lie these days.


What exactly is this disabling? Firefox’s built-in AI tools? Or is it disabling AI tools on websites you visit? Because “blocking” seems like a very misleading term to be using if it’s an internal presence being turned off. We typically only “block” remote things we know to be harmful to our experience, like harassing users on internet platforms or websites known to contain malware.
This is honestly some selfawarewolves shit at this point, Mozilla.


Helldivers was supposed to be a parody!
“Noodle hunting” is the newest social media trend where kids shop for the best deals on premium pastas.


YSalsoK that you don’t need to “take over” an abandoned community, and you can simply remake it on a new instance. The usefulness of this will vary from community to community, but some communities may be better fits for a more niche or interest-specific instance. Spreading out communities across instances helps diversify the Fediverse, and helps to ensure that large swaths of communities don’t all go dark if Lemmy World is having server issues; this happens from time to time, and when it does it seems like 90+% of the threadiverse becomes unusable.
Lemmy World is probably still a good fit for most “general interest” type communities, but it’s also important that you don’t put all your eggs in one basket.
Yeah, but I don’t think that has anything to do with the console’s Bluetooth stack, though. If a game requires a specific controller, that’s usually so that controller-specific features (like touchpad/gyro) will work, which wouldn’t work with an otherwise-standard controller HID profile. This also wouldn’t prevent the device from pairing, which is quite specific terminology that the author uses.
But the way the author describes it, it sounds like at an OS-level that you can’t pair third-party bluetooth accessories, which is such a wildly inaccurate statement to start an article off with, and immediately makes me question the credibility of everything else they write.
Sony locks the wireless stack to their own peripherals, so your headphones or controllers from other brands simply won’t pair :/
My PS5 pairs with third-party headsets and controllers without any issues, what are they talking about?
I’ve got the same combination on my luggage!