• raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    ohhh this one hit a nerve. the butthurt windows users community is out in full force :D And there are still Stockholm syndrome victims delusional enough to think that Windows is easier to install / maintain without realizing that the only thing that has them insist is habit.

      • lancalot@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        Honestly, in terms of ease to play, SteamOS (or clones like Bazzite) don’t do under Windows. Heck, I’d argue they might even be easier.

        The real issue is anti-cheat. But that’s just the next hurdle we’ll have to overcome.

          • lancalot@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            56 seconds ago

            Apologies. Allow me to clarify.

            I meant that it’s not harder than Windows, when it comes to playing games. And I even made that claim stronger by proclaiming that it’s probably even easier.

            Edit: SteamOS is the operating system found on the Steam Deck. It’s basically Arch Linux (btw), but with Valve’s (very) special sauce.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        They are. I have about the same success rate with Proton and WINE(via Heroic Launcher) as to when I still duel booted Windows. If you’re talking about games with rootkit anticheats, I never played those in Windows anyway.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Let’s not cherrypick scenarios to try and pretend Linux is easier than Windows. Most normal people are nervous interacting with a GUI pop-up that gives them two options, never mind putting them into a terminal window where they could seriously fuck up their machine. What about clicking the download link on a webpage, clicking next a few times and having them software on your machine, compared to having to build something from GitHub (how many people here have never had to do that?).

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      Most normal people are nervous interacting with a GUI pop-up that gives them two options, never mind putting them into a terminal window where they could seriously fuck up their machine

      Maybe this is a problem that we should be addressing, rather than just making technology more of a black box, and raising generations of people who have no fucking concept of how any of it works.

      • Exec@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        39 minutes ago

        and raising generations of people who have no fucking concept of how any of it works

        Only two generations were got to be technologically literate.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      Let’s also not conflate “ease” with historical behavior.

      Taking previous experience out of the equation, it is easier to type apt upgrade and reboot to update your entire system than to click through 300 times in the system and multiple apps with reboots.

      That is a fact.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      Most normal people are nervous interacting with a GUI pop-up that gives them two options

      Sadly no. They should be nervous if it’s about making changes to their system. In reality however Windows conditioned them to just click the button labeled “Yes” or “Okay” without even reading the pop-up in the first place.

    • babybus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      Let’s not cherrypick scenarios to try and pretend Linux is easier than Windows. Most normal people are…

      Let’s not cherry pick users then. I don’t care about your normal users. My experience is better on Linux.

    • aski3252@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Unless you have a system without a GUI, you don’t need to open a terminal in order to update or install stuff. There is a GUI for that. And no, you don’t need to build stuff from GitHub for normal user stuff…

      • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I tried that on linux, it doesn’t work if you want to do more than browse the web and other basic stuff.

        You can do some seriously advanced stuff on windows using only GUIs

        • aski3252@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          51 minutes ago

          We were talking about normal user stuff that normal users do, not “seriously advanced stuff”… And I agree that most normal users probably don’t want to use terminals because they are not familiar with them. But normal users probably don’t and shouldn’t do “seriously advanced stuff”, no?

          Yes, if you are trying to do “serously advanced stuff” (whatever that means), chances are you will probably need a terminal (or a terminal will at least be easier), but you shouldn’t be doing “seriously advanced stuff” unless you know what you are doing anyway…

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This applies to pretty much all “Linux good, Win/MacOS bad” memes. I just assume that people either aren’t really serious about them and it’s just tongue in cheek, or they don’t have any contact with regular people.

      I used to work as a(n assistant to the) sysadmin and the things I got called over never stopped to amaze. For instance, there was a case when software was updated on the work machines and I got called because some lady couldn’t use Adobe Acrobat. “It is asking me something, I don’t know what”. I come over and it’s just a TOS Accept/Decline window.

      Some people do not understand computers to an extent that they can lock up in a state of confusion when a button has been moved 100px in any direction from its usual position.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    No restart require on Linux is a joke, right? Because I get updates that require restarts as often as I get them on Windows when updating Mint.

    • Camille@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Unless you’re updating the kernel itself, there is little chance you actually need to reboot your machine. Just restarting whatever service or application you’re using should do the trick.

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This is the same on Windows, you can just carry on and then complete an update when you go to shut down the machine. Can’t remember the last time an app install or update required the whole OS to be restarted immediately.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I remember what it’s called, but at some point there was an app for windows that would check if your machine actually needed a restart or not. Basically the “restart your machine” prompt is mostly just a boilerplate. It’s very rare that those installers touch anything that can’t actually be loaded without a restart.

        • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Kde neon made me reboot Everytime it updated. Turns out there was a setting I could disable. Afterwards I was never bugged about rebooting.

          Used discover for updates

          Maybe you have such a setting?

        • Camille@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You do you, it can’t hurt to reboot and work on a fresh restart. But if for some reasons you need to keep your machine up, you’ll know it is less of a problem than on windows typically

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Besides a kernel update… Which one?

      Honest question, as I usually just restart to be sure I haven’t missed to restart a service or something, but theoretically I could restart every program and service, that got updated.

      Maybe Mint is very conservative here…

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Afaik mint just says you have to restart but don’t forces you. Iirc it was there to avoud any glitches which could be caused by apps interacting with each other in different versions(say some system app got updated and desktop environment is still the old since its loaded before update then cause gui mismatch due to different versions of ui toolkit)

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I mean, in this case Windows doesn’t force you to restart either, you can just keep chugging along with the restart icon set the bottom right… That icon can stay there for weeks on my girlfriend’s laptop

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Depends on your kernel, the distro kernel, and your package manager settings. One of the biggest selling points for Redhat is the live patch kernel updates with zero down time. However, Redhat is the original Linux distro and their devs do a lot of the kernel code maintenance and development.

      • Despotic Machine@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Redhat is not the original. Just of the ongoing projects, there is both Slackware and Debian, which are both older than Redhat. Redhat stands out because they are a commercial, for profit company, so they have more money and resources to invest in Linux development than most organizations, and they have a vested interest since it is their product base.

  • hinterlufer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    somepackage requires otherpackage version >10.1.79

    otherpackage is already at latest version

    Have fun compiling it yourself and messing up what is managed by the package manager and what’s not. And don’t forget that the update might break some other package along the way

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      42 minutes ago

      Huh, pacman always seemed to automatically work out those dependency loops, or whatever you want to call them, when I was on EndeavourOS. The only time I had an issue with updating was when I went like two weeks without updating, and then ran out of harddrive space halfway through installing the 600 updates.

      I’ve been running Bazzite for several months now, and updating is absurdly easy and unintrusive. It’s basically impossible to fuckup (and if you do, it’s extremely simple to rollback). I can really see immutable/atomic being the future of Linux.

      • Farid@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Don’t use apostrophes wherever you see an “s” at the end of a word. If you’re unsure about whether or not to use an apostrophe, just don’t. Because statistically, there are far fewer cases where you need 'em than there are cases where you don’t. Plus if you missed the apostrophe where it should be, people will just assume you didn’t bother to type it or it was a typo. Whereas if you do type it where it shouldn’t be, it’s a clear case of “this person doesn’t know how apostrophes work”.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Chocolatey is the best option I’ve found for this on Windows:

    Chocolatey was created by Rob Reynolds in 2011 with the simple goal of offering a universal package manager for Windows. Chocolatey is an open source project that provides developers and admins alike a better way to manage Windows software.

    You can install & uninstall software from the command line and update everything installed through it with one command.

    It’s not a real package manager of course. It can’t update the operating system, and Windows applications aren’t built for modularity and shared libraries the way Linux applications are. But it does automate application management like nothing else. I highly recommend this if you use Windows.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There’s winget now too, which is the official Windows package manager. I’ve used it a couple of times now and worked as expected, not sure how it compares to chocolatey outside of simple app installs though.

      • uranibaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        I love winget, at least for the initial installation. No more having to search the the download and click through a gui. Just one or two commands (two if searching for the id) and done.

    • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Winget sucks ass. Fails half of the time, lists way too much I did not install through Winget m, even had apps broken because of bad updates through Winget.

      Never had these problems with scoop or chocolatey though.

      • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That sucks. I use it to handle all software on my work dev machine and haven’t had any issues so far. We basically use it to set up clean machines and it’s worked perfectly so far.

  • gramie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’ve been a Linux user on and off since 1996, and there are still times when I give up trying to install software because of cryptic error messages.

    Yes, I had my parents using Linux Mint for about 5 years, but eventually my brother who lived near them switched them to Windows because if there was a problem with Linux he couldn’t help.

    Don’t worry, this is definitely the year of the Linux desktop.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      46 minutes ago

      Perhaps its just gotten better, but I’ve been on it for a year or two now, and I haven’t come across an error message that didn’t bring up solutions when copy/pasted into google. Definitely varies by distro though, I was on EndeavourOS for most of that time, and being Arch, it has like infinite documentation.

  • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 hour ago

    You people always come off as old people on infomercials.

    Anyways Linus desktop is a mess. You are delusional if you think it’s easier. Maybe more efficient workflows for certain things but easier is a lol.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      31 minutes ago

      Anyways Linus desktop is a mess. You are delusional if you think it’s easie

      Use it before saying shit that’s so blatantly stupid

  • VonVoelksen@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I don’t like windows either, but updating with Winget in terminal works pretty good. Not as good as with Linux, but better than downloading every app via browser.

  • BatrickPateman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Windows side of things is getting better though, thanks to winget. Not perfect and it f’s up with certain packages but already a lot better than updating by hand.

    • Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Windows is not getting better,
      CoPilot, Recall, all more unwanted spyware…

      UniGetUI is a good way to maintain software on Windows in a Linux fashion through package managers,
      however that does not change that the underlying OS is pure spyware.