Just for informational reason, because yes, it’s bullshit you don’t need to think about even without the insanity of the people involved:
It’s basically just an installer for archlinux and a management tool for configuration and dot files. And on top of it it’s all vibe coded with claude…
The alt right <-> social media recruiting pipeline is alive, running well and always expanding
It could disappear…
Nice how the sentence and the general statement work for omarchy and claude.
Nazis… “kind of dicks”… yeah, totally the same thing.
That’s the probably most unhelpful and stupid thing I saw in quite some time. The AI or Not Quiz right at the beginning in particular regularly links the exact same things to human or to AI (404 links are a sign or AI hallucination or just natural link decay that show it’s from a human; wonky grammar is a sign for AI unless the text is human-written where it’s just bad english that LLMs would not produce intentionally…).
Yes, spotting AI by clear attributes isn’t easy. If it was those points would be changed first in training of AI. But lengthily discussing tell–tale signs then interpreting them in contrary ways depending on source is absolute bullshit.
Data protection is actually a misnomer. Protecting your data is just a tool to protect you.
And so the GDPR does not only protect your data. It also protects you from things like profiling or automated legal decisions based on existing data.
For example a health provider is of course allowed to collect and save you health information. Analysing their huge data set and deciding that you are statistically a risk patient and terminating your contract is still very much illegal.
A security advisor at work recommends migrating to SaaS
The security advisor doesn’t care about handling security. He cares about handling the responsibility of a security fuck-up.
You are probably also one of those insane ideologues that refuse to hammer in a screw for some reason, although you know how well that hammer worked on nails… 😂
There is a reason we are putting up with decades of legacy stuff still from the original x86 architecture in PCs… the compatibility of hardware and the standardisation even if it’s through several extensions build off each other is unmatched.
ARM architecture might be much simpler but you constantly need hardware specific adaptions, which makes support for different mobile devices this mess.
It’s a tool, use it where it works and don’t where it doesn’t.
But that doesn’t work with the people creating AI as they are totally dependent on the believe that AI can do absolutely everything (and an artificial general intelligence is just moments away…) to justify they insane investments. So they will make up a million stupid narratives why some people are “actually” not using AI as it obviously can’t be because of AI shortcomings…
Thanks for reminding me. I spend far to long trying to remember where that picture was from.
(Also: setting sails for the high seas…)
I’m still using the S7e. The failing battery was so nice to pop open the glued back, so I could easily and cheaply replace it.
People actually thought about that… so snapshots are read-only
No, it just looks like satire (or alternatively pure insanity) to anyone still having a working brain cell.
That’s my point. A version upgrade having issues would have forced you to do it by now.
No, all those tech idiots are actually trying to destroy the world then rule over the ruins from their secure luxury bunkers and islands. Maximized disruption and destructive tendencies backfiring from time to time is just a side effect.
I can’t be the only one who had Arch on a system before getting a smartphone
But that issue is solved for many years now. Although it makes a certain kind of sense: a lot of the Arch hate and memes causes we to question if that person has actually used Arch in years. So a lot of those ideas may be indeed ancient experiences surviving purely in memes and stories.
Manjaro which is less stable than Arch in my experience.
That’s because their whole concept is bullshit. Delaying updates for two weeks would make sense, when they actually used that time frame for testing and to fix bugs before release. In reality they just delay everything without sense, so you actually get the same bugs, just 2 weeks later because the fixes are also delayed.
And then they add access to the AUR (by default even, where Arch warns people about the risks) which assumes an up-to-date system, not one lagging 2 weeks behind. Which is a big shiny invitation to dependency hell.
Sadly those benchmarks only tell me that they did test only two file systems on LUKS…
in more than one way