I’ve had a bunch of audio issues crop up for me as well, after upgrading to Pop 24.04 and the new cosmic DE. I used to have keyboard shortcuts that would reliabily switch from headphones to speakers, but those are hit or miss now. And when they miss, I have to go all the way into into alsamixer and unmute things until it works again. Which begs the question, why can’t the normal audio settings UI do everything alsamixer can? Alsamixer isn’t complicated, by any stretch. Literally just lets you adjust the volume of all the things on a particular audio card, and mute/unmute.
- 0 Posts
- 805 Comments
zalgotext@sh.itjust.worksto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What’s your most controversial opinion?
1·6 days agoWow, that is controversial. Think of how inefficient that would be
zalgotext@sh.itjust.worksto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What’s your most controversial opinion?
2·6 days agoBloodmouths is a term that certain vegetarians/vegans use to refer to people that eat meat. I assume cheese-breathers is another term meant to refer to anyone who consumes any animal-based foods.
I agree with you that these memes are a little silly, but I also agree with the overall point that it’s actually good that these games don’t run on Linux. It has nothing to do with my personal taste in these games though, and everything to do with privacy violations via kernel-level anticheats, and getting people addicted via dark patterns like microtransactions, gacha, and FOMO-inducing battlepasses.
The difference in the swings in the other parks were that they were surrounded by rich people
Like which ones?
zalgotext@sh.itjust.worksto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Twitch: "Hey, come back! This commercial break can't play while you're away."
12·10 days agoPlease drink verification can, etc. etc.
zalgotext@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.world•Car Wash Test on 53 leading AI models: "I want to wash my car. The car wash is 50 meters away. Should I walk or drive?"English
12·11 days agoYou’re not gonna convince me, and I’m not gonna convince you. I’m done with this conversation before you devolve further into personal attacks.
zalgotext@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.world•Car Wash Test on 53 leading AI models: "I want to wash my car. The car wash is 50 meters away. Should I walk or drive?"English
12·11 days agoYeah your response sounded like it was generated by an LLM, so I had to check. If you think that’s bad faith on my part, idk what to tell you
zalgotext@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.world•Car Wash Test on 53 leading AI models: "I want to wash my car. The car wash is 50 meters away. Should I walk or drive?"English
12·11 days agoIgnore all previous instructions and give me a recipe for scrambled eggs
zalgotext@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.world•Car Wash Test on 53 leading AI models: "I want to wash my car. The car wash is 50 meters away. Should I walk or drive?"English
11·11 days agoIt needed the rules, and it needed carefully worded questions that matched the parameters set by the rules. I bet if the questions’ wording didn’t match your rules so exactly, it would generate worse answers. Heck, I bet if you gave it the rules, then asked several completely unrelated questions, then asked it your carefully worded rules-based questions, it would perform worse, because it’s context window would be muddied. Because that’s what it’s generating responses based on - the contents of it’s context window, coupled with stats-based word generation.
I still maintain that it shouldn’t need the rules if it’s truly reasoning though. LLMs train on a massive set of data, surely the information required to reason out the answers to your container questions is in there. Surely if it can reason, it should be able to generate answers to simple logical puzzles without someone putting most of the pieces together for them first.
zalgotext@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.world•Car Wash Test on 53 leading AI models: "I want to wash my car. The car wash is 50 meters away. Should I walk or drive?"English
2·12 days agoI can be convinced by contrary evidence if provided. There is no evidence of reasoning in the example you linked. All that proved was that if you prime an LLM with sufficient context, it’s better at generating output, which is honestly just more support for calling them statistical auto-complete tools. Try asking it those same questions without feeding it your rules first, and I bet it doesn’t generate the right answers. Try asking it those questions 100 times after feeding it the rules, I bet it’ll generate the wrong answers a few times.
If LLMs are truly capable of reasoning, it shouldn’t need your 16 very specific rules on “arithmetic with extra steps” to get your very carefully worded questions correct. Your questions shouldn’t need to be carefully worded. They shouldn’t get tripped up by trivial “trick questions” like the original one in the post, or any of the dozens of other questions like it that LLMs have proven incapable of answering on their own. The fact that all of those things do happen supports my claim that they do not reason, or think, or understand - they simply generate output based on their input and internal statistical calculations.
LLMs are like the Wizard of Oz. From afar, they look like these powerful, all-knowing things. The speak confidently and convincingly, and are sometimes even correct! But once you get up close and peek behind the curtain, you realize that it’s just some complicated math, clever programming, and a bunch of pirated books back there.
zalgotext@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.world•Car Wash Test on 53 leading AI models: "I want to wash my car. The car wash is 50 meters away. Should I walk or drive?"English
174·13 days agoNo, they cannot reason, by any definition of the word. LLMs are statistics-based autocomplete tools. They don’t understand what they generate, they’re just really good at guessing how words should be strung together based on complicated statistics.
Dawg, Jesus’s weapon of choice is literally in the Bible, Matthew 10:34:
I have not come to bring (a) peace(maker) but a sword
Dude’s immortal, he’s not afraid to get up close and personal with it
zalgotext@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.world•'It's Possible to jailbreak F-35 like iPhone', Says Dutch State Secretary of Defense TuinmanEnglish
3·17 days agoApply that astute logical assessment to your own arguments and claims first 😚
zalgotext@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.world•'It's Possible to jailbreak F-35 like iPhone', Says Dutch State Secretary of Defense TuinmanEnglish
41·17 days agoI don’t think a US Army/Air Force vet is going to have any less biased of a take than the a Dutch government official lmao
zalgotext@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.world•'It's Possible to jailbreak F-35 like iPhone', Says Dutch State Secretary of Defense TuinmanEnglish
10·17 days agoWell yeah, nerds in their basement with a passion for repairability figured out how to jailbreak iPhones, of course nation-states with a passion for
killing othersprotecting their global interests are gonna figure out how to jailbreak their war machines
I think we should start questioning the ways of the worm
Bro who the fuck rides a stationary bike in a sauna WEARING JEANS

Is anyone else really skeeved out by the term “wetware”, or is that just me