• darthy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    After the election results and looking at Elon for past few months, I’m starting to think Trump isn’t the problem. It won’t matter if he stays or not. USA has got bigger knives in it’s chest.

    • solstice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      STARTING to think? Honestly I don’t even hate Trump anymore. It’s like hating a shark or a snake or something. He’s just doing what he does. It’s the ~75 million people who enable him by voting for him that are disgusting and terrifying right now. Half of America is the problem, and he is just a symptom, and it is a BIG BIG BIG problem for the whole world.

      • TetraVega@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve been trying to fathom the amount of misinformation out of here that has accumulated in people’s minds. There are people that I know and love, otherwise intelligent good people, that are thankful that Trump got elected. They believe that everything wrong with America and the world is due to “the Democrats”. And they’ve been that way since before 04.

        • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          There are also people I know (many of whom are relatives) who seem like normal people but then support Trump and all of his policies. I want to think they’re not horrible people and that they’re just brainwashed, but recently I’ve been seeing some of my friends jump on the alt-right bandwagon and posting extremely racist stuff to be “edgy”, even after leaving the far-right culture bubble they lived in. This is the sort of stuff that even when I was still a conservative I would never have thought it would be okay to promote, and I grew up in the same environment they did so it seems like they know perfectly well what they’re doing. After all of this I’m starting to think that maybe many of them are genuinely terrible people.

      • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately. Recently I looked up what has been going on in various European countries, and it seems like with a lot of them there’s an extreme populist party with about 20% control, there’s a less extreme party that’s still queerphobic and anti-abortion but more willing to compromise with maybe about 15% control, and then there’s more liberal but economically conservative parties parties making it so the total of economically conservative parties including the above two is above 50%. These countries also have actual progressive and even some left-wing representation in government.

        Contrast this with the US, which only has a populist party and a socially liberal but economically conservative party that a bunch of people are brainwashed to think is literally communism. There is very little progressive representation even though the country has a significant number of progressives, and people who want less government regulations are voting Republican regardless of their stances on social issues. Meanwhile polls say that opposition to LGBTQ rights and abortion is probably around 30% which is not much different than the European countries I looked at. So I think half the problem is that democracy in the US is basically dysfunctional.

        However, 30% opposition to LGBTQ and abortion rights is still fucking bad, and I’m still trying to figure out whether it is the propaganda to blame or the people themselves. Additionally racism and xenophobia had been on the rise everywhere and has basically gained popular support at this point so democracy clearly isn’t going to solve this.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      This.

      We have an absolutely wrecked educational system that nobody can think anymore. People have either working lives that occupy them 99% of the time and they can’t make informed decisions, or are suffering from 10-second attention-spans and can’t focus on any political messages past “I am the greatest, vote for me” and the fact that is the literal message that won an election, should terrify us all.

      If we have a really big challenge, like a novel new virus or disease, in our current state with our current leaders, millions would di- oh, wait, what? I’m being told this already happened.

      Well, if something else really bad happens then we’ll have similar or worse causalities.

      • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Fix the 99% working lives. If Dems can’t get us a living wage back, what the hell are they good for?

      • solstice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah you can absolutely forget about any meaningful climate change action now, education, health care, things like that.

        • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          The environmental impacts are going to be awful. With Chevron stripped and full gop legislative control it’s going to be free reign for companies to pollute whatever they want.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yeah he’s not going to jail. The bastard is just going to keep laughing at us every day. But he’s only got maybe 20 years to go. I would be surprised if 10. He’s basically 20% rotten McDonald’s M double cheeseburger. We might have to deal with princes Vans instead of Maybe one of the other trump princesses. Who knows.

    All we should do is wait and feed him Peanuts or pretzels. He’s bound to choke in one of those things. Either that or the sodium.

    • ooli@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      still 20 years! Average USA lifespan for man is 75 year. He should already be dead by now.

      Yes money help with living longer, but with his bad health hygiene it should cancel out.

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        Average mean means middle…half the population is still alive at average age unfortunately. But fortunately the whole age range is non-linear because nobody gets to be 150 years old. More like 1 person in the world might get to be 125 years old if they never smoked, never had even looked at a MacDonalds burger on TV etc.

        • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Jean Clemente (the oldest human ever) smoked cigarettes (she didn’t inhale) and ate pounds of chocolate at a time. The oldest Canadian woman ever smoked until she was in her 90s (she lived to be 116), and plenty of other people who lived to be 100 also had ridiculously unhealthy lifestyles but still lived long.

          For Trump, his father lived to be in his 90s. His grandfather died younger because he was a victim of the Spanish Flu in 1918. We don’t know how long he will live, sadly. But I hope he will die of natural causes soon.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Same as some peasant in any civilized country with universal healthcare. Something like 83 or so.

          • Don_alForno@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Nope. In countries with universal healthcare life expectancy sadly is still dependent on wealth. Better food, better doctors, lower chance of having a hazardous job, better ability to rest instead of rushing back to work etc etc.

            (i.e. Germany: About 5 years on average between poorest and richest.) Inequality is bad for us, everywhere.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Given how badly his mental state is doing right now, I wonder if he will even survive his term in office.

      • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Same. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was 25th’d a couple years into his presidency due to his declining mental state. But then we get Vance in charge. Which might be worse.

        20 years is way too generous. I put my money on 5 - 7 years left.

    • RidderSport@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      20? Isn’t the orange turd 80 or somewhere close? Frankly I wouldn’t be surprised if he died of a natural death soonish

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        He’s 78. So in two years he’ll be 80 and in Just a teenager he’ll be 100. Jimmy Carter is 100. 0.03% of the population in the US make it to 100. The population was recently ~346,098,610. So he could be 1 of 10 million people who becomes 100.

        According to stupid Google only 60 people get to be 110. Thus Trump’s maximum life is around 20, but that’s being generous. 10 is more probable. But hopefully any time now. Like a really bad sneeze while he’s having his Coca-Cola in the morning ☺️🌄.

      • droans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        The expected lifespan for someone his age is about another 9 years per the SS actuarial data.

    • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      He’s 78. There’s zero chance he makes 98.

      I doubt he’ll make it to the end of his term. He’s not a fit man.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Well NY can certainly sentence him, and he can potentially serve a custodial sentence. But I suspect that even if the judge handed him time in prison it wouldn’t be four years and would almost certainly be appealed or delayed to be mostly irrelevant. But I would dearly, dearly, DEARLY love to see this asshole go to prison and preferably never come out.

        • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          That’s wild that you can just pardon yourself. I’m pretty sure that kind of thing was even in the Magna Carta ages ago but it’s a thing still in 2024

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            It’s wild the president can pardon anyone. It completely bypasses the legal system and gives the executive branch too much power.

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah, the whole idea of having a president, and not a king, is that they are not above the law too. We saw how that idea was ensured by the supreme court.

            • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              I’m convinced that even on the stuff we know and has been proven in court about Trump, would have been enough to dethrone a European monarch, possibly violently, back in the 1800s, but Trump’s supporters and most of the u.s just allows it and roll with it in 2024

              • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 days ago

                I mean, it is fun to joke about. However, I doubt it. Even as late at the 19th century monarchs were blatantly having rivals imprisoned, and executed. Having large groups of people just rounded up and imprisoned, and/or killed, were stealing large amounts of wealth from the tax payers, and just so, so, much shit. They only really ever found themselves suffering legal consequences when other aristocracy decided they needed to go, or that someone else would be better. That, or if material conditions go so bad widespread revolt broke out, and mob justice was served.

      • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        As I understand it, this is a state case where he can’t. Federal pardon powers extend only to federal cases.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Only even hypothetically for federal crimes. State crimes aren’t federal jurisdiction and he has no pardon power over them. Usually pardon power over state crimes is in the hands of the governor.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’d bet either just fines, a suspended sentence or if there is a custodial sentence that it will explicitly be delayed not to begin until Jan 21, 2029. Pretty sure there’s something somewhere about not being able to use law enforcement powers to interfere with the ability of Congress/the Presidency/SCOTUS to do their appointed jobs. Otherwise the Chief of the Capitol Police would be the most powerful legislator in the country, by simply holding legislators he opposes for questioning any times there’s an important vote.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Step 1.5: rot in solitary confinement in the meantime.

      It’s not much, but it’s not nothing either.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s the plan, but it’s not clear how it’s going to work. There’s a question of why the Supreme Court of the United States would be allowed to address state crimes at all. Most of the time, they aren’t allowed to.

        • orcrist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          That does seem like a distinct possibility, and I don’t think it would make anything worse. It’s not like he is going to be locked up during the presidency, so if they do anything else to undercut attempts to hold him accountable, it only makes their reputation worse.

          And if the US recovers, after several years or after many years, it’s good to have more information about exactly how f***** up that court was so we know what kinds of things we need to try to prevent from ever happening again. Do we need a constitutional amendment to prevent the court from accepting bribes? How about one that says the president can’t pardon themselves? How about one that says convicted felons can’t run for office? There are all sorts of constitutional amendments that we didn’t know we needed until this court came about. So please, let them deliver more to us, especially if it’s a situation like this where there wasn’t going to be justice anyway.

  • _lilith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    “We put all our politicians in prison as soon as they’re elected. Don’t you?” “Why?” “It saves time.” -Terry Pratchett, The Last Continent

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    The legal loophole is called maximum sentence.

    But no, he was always going to get something like 2 years supervised parole.

  • marzhall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’d assume any sentence for time to serve would be suspended until after his term.

    That said, it would be very funny to be in a time where the US President could not visit certain states because he would be arrested.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    It is not actually legal to do this. A state can’t interfere with the functioning of the federal executive branch. Most constitutional scholars would say the sentence just gets suspended until the end of his term.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      It wouldn’t effect the functioning of the federal system. You seem to forget he spent the majority of his time in his idiotic faux gold penthouse or at Mar a lago.

      Dumping him into white collar prison wouldn’t change any of that and fed prisoners can still get temporary hardship/work release anyway.

  • Happywop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Battle of the billionaires, make no mistake the way i see it, the world is being fought over by conflicting groups of billionaires. There’s the current winner group the christo-fascist sect. The competing Tech-bro billionaires who want us all to live like foxxcon slaves and unfortunate dead last is the humanist billionaires who actually wanted to do some good while stealing us blind.