• Imhereforfun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    50 minutes ago

    Breakthrough technology, never seen before in the mobile market. Apple, like always, surprises the word with the latest never seen before tech that will become mainstream in the near future, thanks to apple and its affordable pricing for everyday customers.

    Now just slap that 2,5-3k RRP on the device and let it sell out in.

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Assuming he’s right (and boy, being sued by apple is a huge boost to his credibility), they’re keeping the stupid camera bump thing from the air???

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      It does not surprise me that the Air is literally the folding phone without the second screen.

    • scratchee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The camera bump sure isn’t going away for a folding phone. cameras have fundamental volume requirements to maintain quality, if they don’t think they can justify making the normal iPhone thick enough to enclose the camera then there’s no way in hell they’ll think the folding phones doubled width can include it, if anything you’d expect it to be more prominent on a folding model

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I mean, being stupid thin is something that a foldable phone has to be, so that it ends up being normal-ish thickness when folded. So it tracks that they’d design it like their ultra-thin phone.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      how do you propose removing it?

      there are two options, 1) using a smaller,shittier camera, or 2) making an extremely thick phone. neither option is very “apple”, especially for a flagship model.

      considering the vast majority of people use phone cases and will never notice the bump anyway, i think this whole thing is blown way out of proportion.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        The marketing about it being an incredibly thin phone was a misstep - it just looked absurd to have such a chunky lump stuck onto it, and it felt very much like they were attempting a have cake / eat cake situation by claiming it had incredible camera stats (which werent very good) to justify the bump on an otherwise amazingly thin phone, and then that giant electronics bump had an external lens on it too.

        Had it just been an ugly phone, I doubt it would have met with anywhere near the same criticism, but all the adcopy about how thin it was overtop of photos where you could see it had a giant lump on it felt really dishonest, and if this article is accurate it may count among the biggest apple flops ever.

        (The thickness may just need to be accepted at this point. The S25 Ultra is 8.2mm, which is thinner than the Air if you include the bump. It seems like the camera wasnt the issue then, but that they hamstrung their design team with their drive for a thin phone. What elegance might even an extra millimeter of chassis space produced?)

    • FireWire400@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The stupid camera bump thing they totally didn’t steal from Google

      Edit: Yes, I’m totally butthurt about that guys. Fuck Tim Apple!!11

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 minutes ago

            I sort of assumed that these days design patents are mostly ignored by smartphone companies.

            After a while it just makes sense to drop the legal stuff and stop wasting money on constant lawsuits.

        • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          “These assholes included an antenna and SIM slot again!?! HTC did that last season. So unoriginal.”

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 minutes ago

      People who judge other people based on nothing other than what technology brand they use instantly are instantly lower on my respectometer.

      Fuck off with that shit.

      I used Symbian for years, then I used android tablets as a complement to the Symbian phones for years, then I got an iPhone for work, and when my last Symbian device died I got an iPhone as I knew the OS from my work phone. A few years later I tried an Android phone for a few months, but when the display got totaled in a drop, and I had to send the phone away, I just got back to my iPhone as it was easier to fix on the spot in local repair shops.

      I am an IT guy, I don’t care about blue or green bubbles, if you are on Android, that is fine, that probably works better for you, for me iOS has so far served me well.

      Stop judging others for their preference of tech brands. Apple and Google are both evil.

  • theherk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Remove the outside screen and all cameras and I’d be slightly more interested.