~$|>>> Onlyfans! <<<|$~

If only you didn’t have to give google money to be able to install it.

… Illegal?

Both are correct, although the use of “lighted” as in the above is becoming archaic.

I won’t let it go to my head. I promise. Probably.

Anyways tho for an actual opinion:

This thread is a bit of a mess and I would caution taking anything being said (except by me, the absolute authority) without a large grain of salt - however mostly people aren’t contradicting each other, it’s just a hugely complex topic that quickly devolves into semantic-adjacent arguments about how we should be comparing battery chemistries (on market / in lab / cross-chemistry) and what degree we should be considering the “soft factors”; things like the number of recharge cycles, robustness of the cells to damage, cost of manufacturing and/or recycling the cells, etc.

Sodium batteries are a big deal, and as far as I’ve seen we’re finally at the point where they’re starting to become market viable, but they’re still a largely unproven technology. Arguing that battery tech hasn’t improved in the last decade is obviously wrong, but it’s also not wrong to say that there hasn’t been any dramatic improvement in the technology in the last decade. None of the many “miracle battery tech” announcements that promise to have double-or-better the capacity of lithium chemistries has panned out, we’ve just been making slow gains across many chemistries and those cumulative 10% improvements to battery life year-over-year are finally starting to add up to where the average consumer can really notice them.

Start of my villain arc right here. Like unidan, but with more buttholes.

Did you mean to tag me?

(You can edit post titles on lemmy, fwiw)

I get the joke but for the sake of strict accuracy I’m so white I’m borderline translucent. I just meant that every mall around me is dead and abandoned.

Huh, I got arrested for breaking into an abandoned building…

Red-dyed ones were all over the middle east when I was a kid, but I’ve never once seen them in the US sold this way. I think it just depended on what exporter importer your region mainly used.

No AI has perfect safeguards, but all the mainstream models will generally refuse requests for information about comitting suicide. They might encourage it thru indirect means or a question may avoid the safeguards, though, so it can only be described in general terms - generally they will not answer.

Man, I haven’t seen this image in a decade and I can still spot it.

They upload the following meme to everyone’s printer and call it a day:

In this case there’s no evidence showing that it’s being spread widely - the bug reports are entirely about users being shown their own content. If you have something to dispute that I’m all ears.

Yeah it’s the new LemmyNSFW (or aims to be) and same, the 18+ is impassible here too.

For clarity, it’s only being summarized for the users that wrote it, it’s not leaking them to everyone. A comedically inept bug to allow though, holy shit.

Yeesh no that’s what they’re after, they’re spaming this drivel everywhere to promote their youtube channel.

God, it really is.

It was throwing a 521 so maybe? As far as I know it’s still just speculation, nobody’s been able to get ahold of the head admin that I’ve seen.

A quite reasonable argument could be made that a battery simply sitting around is only connected to one circuit (itself thru the air) and thus there’s not an “unintended” one it’s also connected to that could be considered a short - but really, my unstated point this whole time is that this is not a usefully rigorously defined term. The definition on wikipedia is as close as we’ll get, and it’s extremely broad by it’s nature.