~$|>>> Onlyfans! <<<|$~

it’s wild they do that while you’re awake in an exam room

It’s a little hyperbolic to say, but the most dangerous part of a surgery really is the anesthesia. If you can do an operation without it it’s far, far better for the patient, even though it sucks to have to be conscious through it.

You also did that, yes. However in the section I quoted, which I responded to with the above example, you criticized her and those like her for her word usage in general within this context.

But for Israel they spontaneously forget them.

No you criticized her for her word usage in general, please do not try and present this like I said you were criticizing her for what she said during the 12 day war. She used the same terms used by trump to emphasize what she was responding to - and then repeatedly clarified in the body of the statement what it actually was. That’s a completely reasonable choice to make.

It’s an example of her using the specific language you’re criticizing her for not using in reference to the US and Israel attacking Iran. How on earth does that “not apply anymore”? It’s literally the exact thing you said she doesn’t do.

https://x.com/AOC/status/1937525272594595993

That seems like it’s wholly up for interpretation - she calls it unlawful, then after several paragraphs outlining it’s fundemental immorality she points out that it’s illegal under US law. If you choose to interpret that as her saying it’s only illegal under US law I can’t stop you, but I think that’s a very unfair reading since she lays it out clearly as a war of aggression.

Did she say those exact words in this one statement? No. Has she condemned bombing iran as illegal in the past? yes.

She didn’t say the the exact phrase in this release, possibly because what you’re demanding was word-for-word already said by Mamdani in his condemnation. She describes it as illegal and repeatedly calls it a war, both in no uncertain terms, and has almost nailed the same phrase in the past the last time this happened.

She spends the first four paragraphs calling it out as immoral, and at the end includes that it’s also illegal. She isn’t undermining her point by calling on congress to limit executive authority for military action, the war would still be everything she described it as in the first four paragraphs.

She can’t call it an illegal war of aggression without calling it illegal.

Except that’s not how that works - creating a healthy used resale market drives demand for the Pixel phones. I may not be giving them my money directly, but it’s still of huge monetary benefit to Google if I purchase one of their phones used. I like grapheneOS, I really do, but it’s inseparability from Google hardware is a serious problem.

If only you didn’t have to give google money to be able to install it.

… Illegal?

Both are correct, although the use of “lighted” as in the above is becoming archaic.

I won’t let it go to my head. I promise. Probably.

Anyways tho for an actual opinion:

This thread is a bit of a mess and I would caution taking anything being said (except by me, the absolute authority) without a large grain of salt - however mostly people aren’t contradicting each other, it’s just a hugely complex topic that quickly devolves into semantic-adjacent arguments about how we should be comparing battery chemistries (on market / in lab / cross-chemistry) and what degree we should be considering the “soft factors”; things like the number of recharge cycles, robustness of the cells to damage, cost of manufacturing and/or recycling the cells, etc.

Sodium batteries are a big deal, and as far as I’ve seen we’re finally at the point where they’re starting to become market viable, but they’re still a largely unproven technology. Arguing that battery tech hasn’t improved in the last decade is obviously wrong, but it’s also not wrong to say that there hasn’t been any dramatic improvement in the technology in the last decade. None of the many “miracle battery tech” announcements that promise to have double-or-better the capacity of lithium chemistries has panned out, we’ve just been making slow gains across many chemistries and those cumulative 10% improvements to battery life year-over-year are finally starting to add up to where the average consumer can really notice them.

Start of my villain arc right here. Like unidan, but with more buttholes.

Did you mean to tag me?

(You can edit post titles on lemmy, fwiw)

I get the joke but for the sake of strict accuracy I’m so white I’m borderline translucent. I just meant that every mall around me is dead and abandoned.

Huh, I got arrested for breaking into an abandoned building…

Red-dyed ones were all over the middle east when I was a kid, but I’ve never once seen them in the US sold this way. I think it just depended on what exporter importer your region mainly used.

No AI has perfect safeguards, but all the mainstream models will generally refuse requests for information about comitting suicide. They might encourage it thru indirect means or a question may avoid the safeguards, though, so it can only be described in general terms - generally they will not answer.