“IVE GOUT IT” also fits

Death toll in the jail article is ~1029 yearly, if its explicitly stated I didn’t see it. That was calculated from the figures given (total pop 735k * death rate of 1.4/1000) (That number is wrong, as stated in the article the actual rate is likely to be slightly higher because they had to exclude a great many sources from their sample due to bad or questionable data).

It should be noted that those deaths aren’t divided by cause: police muders, inmate violence, deaths from pre-existing conditions, lightning strikes, deaths from conditions exacerbated by the quality of care available in the prision, dying from old age, fatal infections from rusty stairs, deaths from food poisoning, fatal allergic reactions to bee-stings, suicides etc. are all lumped together because they’re all relevant to the conclusions of the study, but aren’t necessarily relevant here.

I split the tabs into multiple windows by category, personally (tho firefox’s tab grouping is pretty great too). And it’s more about it being present - bookmarks are fine, but if I am not actively reminded of something I likely will just forget about it entirely. Bookmarks aren’t visible all the time, so they just get forgotten.

Those… look it’s NOT hard to find data to show the death toll for the US, so why did you go with such horrible examples?

There is no widely agreed on figure for the number of people that have been killed so far in the war on terror as the Bush Administration has defined it to include the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq, and operations elsewhere. According to Joshua Goldstein, an international relations professor at the American University, the global war on terror has seen fewer war deaths than any other decade in the past century.

Like beyond how rough the numbers are: the wiki pages all include the total death counts, but those are both coalition wars and the total deaths are not broken down at all. This data exists, you can find it, but you can’t find it there so why use it?

Similarly, the paper on jail deaths very much does not answer the question, as it is an analytical study on the impact of jail conditions on mortality and explicitly does not address the causal conditions of those deaths:

[…] health and mortality data for people who are incarcerated or in police custody have been shown to be “incomplete…incorrect… [and] anachronistic,”42 and jail data may underestimate deaths or contain inaccuracies related to causes of death. Finally, the associations found in the study do not suggest causality.

It is not hard to show what you want to show. By instead providing such poor quality sources, you undermine the credibility of your point to a spectacular degree. Like. Just use real numbers? Hell, it’s not hard to find very reasonable estimates on death tolls from imperialism itself. But notoriously vague values from sources that explicitly clarify their own imprecision is just a terrible way to approach this.

“Black box” usually refers to both the Flight Data Recorder and the Cockpit Voice Recorder as a nebulous whole - some FDRs are also configured to record pilot mics as well but that’s not standard.

Cyclopean walls (haphazard stacks of boulders) are what most Europeans think of as “stone walls” so ones that aren’t just loose piles of rocks are pretty impressive by that standard.

The coolest part is really that they’re so complexly fitted without mortar - which allows for stone constructions to survive in an earthquake prone region. The stones can slip past each other without losing their place relative to each other when jostled, which is why Incan stoneworks like this are still standing when all the stuff the murdering bastards Spaniards built have long since collapsed.

The slides are just ignored, the real super secret is all the tunnels at the site (the lizardpeople made them)

These things.

They get dismissed as a natural rock formation and somehow people claim that only in modern times have people considered them slides and it drives me nuts. They’re so obviously slides, the biggest ones have been worn smooth by centuries of asses going down them (a geologist I met while down there was working on proving it was centuries of asses that had polished them), any child ever will go “fuck yeah I’m gonna go slide down that”, and yet people constantly either ignore or dismiss them. Just argh.

“Sacks-uh-wha-man” is pretty close, iirc it’s originally an aymara name so it’s a little “borderline impossible” to get the pronunciation 100% right if you’re not a native speaker. Beautiful place, but nobody ever, EVER talks about the fucking slides and it drives me nuts.

Oh, you’re trolling. Alright, fair enough. I gotta ask though, why troll in defense of the christians? They’re doing more than enough to destroy society without your helping out on their behalf by sowing nonsense like this.

A sarcastic thought experiment, then?

The image I used of the modern $20 is a counterfeit one. Real US currency does not have “MONEY” written on it in cartoon fonts (and also it lacks the eurion constellation). The color gradient is accurate, though.

That person has gone on to repeatedly double down on the position elsewhere in the comments, I’m afraid to say the hivemind was right on this one and they sure appear to be a whackdoodle that actually believes what they said there.

Did you mean Poe’s Law? That would imply you only made the claim about divine selection bias sarcastically, and we all just thought you were being serious.

Yeah but respect isn’t proof, and you’re the one that made the assertion requiring evidence here…

Neither do you.

Yes, but importantly you can’t demonstrate that it was a god that saved them. We’ll deal with the issue of which one it was once we get past that first problem.

That’s demonstrably false.

Er… Well, this seems like a great opportunity for you to prove that. Though I suspect you misunderstood the initial comment here.

This was more a comment on how the american aesthetic is so prolific that you still think of US currency being green despite it being long past the point where that was true, rather than a comment on what the colors actually are.

Modern US bills are really more of a white-blue with bruise yellow tones (except for the $1s) - but damn is the idea of the “american greenback” deeply rooted in the cultural identity!

(dunno if you’re being sarcastic)

It’s just a twee catchphrase christians came up with to say you can’t prove a negative. It’s not anything new, and it’s not actually contributing anything. It’s a core aspect of “burden of proof”, and this is just a way of shifting said burden to the people asking for evidence of the divine instead of leaving it on the people asserting that the divine exists in the first place.

Point to where I dismissed something

“Neither are definitely correct” - it’s right there, and although I guess you didn’t intend that, it’s what you were doing.

You’re not being criticized because people “short-circuted” or failed understand your comment (it wasn’t exactly complex), you’re being criticized because you did an incredibly common thing and then you have evidently failed to understand that’s what you were doing.