• MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    5 小时前

    “Allow”. The fact that they must allow, is the key abhorrent element.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 小时前

      Yeah, allow implies voluntary. They’re only doing this because they’re required to. Like how Apple only offers phones with USB-C where they’re forced to.

  • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 小时前

    This might be wishful thinking but could this lead to Nintendo and other console manufacturers having to open up their ecosystem and allow third party stores?

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 小时前

    So what alternative apps stores are there? Is there any other app store for Android that lets developers charge users for the app? Samsung’s Galaxy Store I guess? Anything for iPhone?

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      7 小时前

      because of the cut in digital sales theyd get. phone companies are the current front, but its going to get extremely messy when the front gets for example, put into the console gaming front. its all for money for software they did not develop and prevent that money from going to any other payment processor.

      for example on the PS5 front, sony makes more than 50% of their revenue on live service games. none that they actually own themselves. Apple, and to a lesser extent, Google, apply that for ALL software, and gain additional money from developer subscriptions. It’s the same fear Valve had back when Microsoft was pushing for the Microsoft Store to become the defacto storefront for personal computers. that push however failed miserably.

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 小时前

      Phones were already restricted by what could be installed on them prior to smart devices entering the scene.

      Given how powerful the hardware is, it should have eased up long ago. They’ve over played their hand and are still unable to acknowledge it.

  • No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    9 小时前

    Oh true competition. Nice.

    It would be amazing knowing if as a tourist one can have access to a different browser in iPhone or sideload crazy apps that block ads without questioning.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 小时前

      If it’s anything like the EU setup, it’s based off of where your iCloud account is based out of. At least I think that was what it was last time I went looking.

      • Meron35@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 小时前

        Nope, Apple is way more anal than that.

        You need to have an iCloud account registered in the EU/Japan, AND be physically located in EU/Japan.

        Changing the iCloud account region requires you to contact Apple, surrendering all of your current account balance, and providing them with an EU/Japan billing method + address. Users have also reported mixed results with VPNs in getting around the physical location requirement.

        About alternative app distribution - Apple Support - https://support.apple.com/en-us/118110

    • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      9 小时前

      Uh, well you can already have a different browser. I know Firefox, Opera, Chrome, and Brave are all on iOS. Brave has built in adblocking, but AdGuard is also available if you want to block ads in Safari. I’m in North America, but I assume they are available worldwide.

      • vinnymac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        edit-2
        8 小时前

        I wouldn’t call them different browsers, more like skins or “chrome”. All iOS browsers are built on Apple WebKit. This essentially makes all of them reskinned versions of Safari.

        Sure they may have some clever UI, accessibility, or platform specific functionality. But they are nothing like any of those browsers on other operating systems.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 小时前

        They still all use the safari engine though, unless something has changed and I missed it.

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 小时前

    I’ve never found this to be an issue as a Pixel user who never buys IAPs in Japan (or much of the PlayStore, honestly). But it’s cool that I can pick different payment options. Does this mean iPhone users can basically install whatever app they want or do apps still need to be approved by Apple or something?

    • Adam_Crock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 分钟前

      same I only need two apps outside F-Droid (ProtonMail + Whatsapp) and even those two apps are available as apk in their official wbsites