For serious comments, my true audience is the unknown reader. For jokes, my audience is myself alone.

Lemmy dev suggestions: Remove all downvotes. User blocks should keep the blockee from seeing the blocker.

  • 0 Posts
  • 259 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 27th, 2023

help-circle

  • Today, we have 0%. At the beginning of the Biden administration, we had 95%. The policies of that administration really caused us to lose practically the entire China market. - NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

    The article says that both Biden’s and later, Trump’s policies have decreased NVIDIA’s market share. He’s really phrasing it in a favorable way to Trump. Like, the same way, you could say the following, “At the beginning of the Obama administration, we had zero deaths from COVID. Now, we have millions.” Just skip over the part that is inconvenient for propaganda, right?

    However, the loss of NVIDIA’s market share in China isn’t only attributed to the previous administration, since under President Trump, Team Green had to halt the sales of its H20 AI chip temporarily, and they were resumed only after the firm agreed on a ‘revenue sharing’ model with the Trump government. More importantly, with US-China trade relations being influenced, NVIDIA also suffered a significant setback from China, as domestic regulators and authorities began persuading Chinese Big Tech companies not to use Team Green’s AI chips.

    Also, Jensen Huang’s statement betrays an insane naivete about China. Newsflash: China always tries to take international industry and make a domestic Chinese version. If you have a 95% share of something in China and you’re a foreign company, that simply means it’s related to some fresh technology, or that it’s virtually worthless. If it is believed to have value, China will have their own stuff before you know it, and don’t expect IP laws like patents or copyright to slow them down. They don’t give a shit about that stuff for foreign companies.





  • LOGIC💣@lemmy.worldtocats@lemmy.worldCat shenanigans
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    If space is limited and there was no other choice

    I think there’s always a choice to just not have drawers there. Like, literally just choose to have the door sweep clear. Even if you moved into that house, you can even just remove the drawer completely.












  • LOGIC💣@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Obviously, being asked to perform a paternity test is an implication of low character.

    However, I suspect that in the near future, DNA tests will be done as a matter of course to test the baby for genetic diseases, and as a result, the paternity will also be known from the same test.

    It seems a little dystopian, but we are already in that dystopia, and people simply don’t know it. That’s because of familial DNA testing. Even if you never get your DNA tested, as long as some of your descendants get tested, the paternity will be known. Everybody should already assume that children of affairs being born today will be exposed during the mother’s lifetime.

    So, the good thing about this dystopia is that there will be some point where specific paternity tests will not be a thing, and all of these type of accusations of low character will go away. Small comfort for somebody who is going through this right now, though.


  • no plan for federation, and no guardrails to stop the slow slide into bloat

    What would be an example of a guardrail to stop the slow slide into bloat?

    I’m not asking for a detailed explanation, but I simply can’t understand what sort of feature you’re imagining.

    I sort of get the idea that maybe you just mean that you’re already seeing the beginnings of bloat, but if there was something that could actually stop bloat, that sounds very interesting.



  • LOGIC💣@lemmy.worldtoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksNewsom Gets It
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wrote “post” instead of “comment”, since a comment is a type of post. It’s a common way of referring to any content “posted” on the internet as a “post.” I’ll admit it was a very minor mistake, and I’ll try not to do that in the future.

    Besides, I’m not going through the posting history of every user who acts like an asshole. But I’m glad that you seem to agree that it was misleading, or at least you’re not complaining about that. In that case, you certainly would know better than I, since I didn’t even look at it.