I fully understand backup in layers. Ideally you want an onsite backup, and an offsite backup. But for the onsite… do you even try to protect it from fire?

If not, doesn’t that mean all your “fire” protection is really just the one online layer?

And if you do, where do you get such a thing. I have looked around, I can’t find anything that actually lists hard drives as protected. Like sentry safe has “data protection” safes, but they say this

"CDs, DVDs, memory sticks and USB drives up to 1700°F (927°C) for all FPW base models. These products are NOT intended to protect computer floppy or 21⁄4” diskettes, cartridges, tapes, audio or video cassettes, or photo negatives. "

That doesn’t seem to include HDD or SSD. So I started wondering if anyone actually tries to protect their onsite backup from fire.

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve had corporate clients with halogen fire suppression systems.

    I’ve seen home offices use lto tape and a thermal resistant safe.

    I’ve heard of people linking networks with the neighbour and using a remote drive at their house.

    • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I duplicate my data to my parents house, and I think it’s far enough that one backup point could be nuked and my data would still be safe 👍

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I am not sure if it is still applicable, but with the 3-2-1 rule, that should work good enough. 3 copies of your data on two different medium with one off-site backup.

        So the data with it’s local backup that is copied to an off site backup. Which is probably your case (I assume that your offsite backup is a copy of your local backup).

  • xylene@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t bother.

    A fire (or flood or theft or…?) threat might take out both of my local copies. To offset that risk, I put a lot of effort into making sure the offsite copy is always functional, up-to-date, and healthy (S.M.A.R.T and otherwise).

    I’ve been considering keeping a fourth copy of extra extremely crucial data encrypted on Backblaze B2, but honestly…if I lose my whole 3-2-1 stack, it’s probably time to go live as a goat.

    • postnataldrip@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah this is what I do. All the important or irreplaceable stuff easily fits on a USB HDD, and I leave one with a friend I visit regularly. I just run three drives total and no more than two of them are in the same place at the same time. Cheap, simple, and a good excuse to catch up.

      • hansolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        This should be a thing. Like a trusted group of people to store encrypted backups at their house. Just needs a catchy name. “Data Safety Social Club”?

  • astrsk@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sure, my place has the required residential sprinklers and a couple up to date fire extinguishers around.

    Besides, offsite backup is 1:1 on identical hardware with off-grid power resilience. Worst case scenario I have to order new hardware and physically move the old machine for a local duplication again.

    All of it is insured of course with yearly audits.

  • WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    My production and onsite backup burned in a fire this summer. Everything backed up remotely. Once I get new hardware I’ll be back where I left off in less than an hour (if everything goes as planned)

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The cloud storage is backed up to an external harddrive (only like 200 GB) and the on site stuff is backed up to the cloud.

    If we end up with the office burning down and a ransomware attack or something at the cloud storage at the same time we are beyond fucked anyway.

    At home I’ve got nothing important enough to care for either.

    What I’d do is occasionally take an external harddrive with a backup to another site. Does not need to be fire proof. Sure you can have two simultaneous fires, but you’ve got to draw the line somewhere.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    No. I didn’t do backups during the last decades, so maybe I’m going to start some day, eventually, but surely not with overdoing it ;-)

      • sparky1337@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think they mean if you’re using removable media that is easily portable then the answer to your question about fire proofing is doable.

        You can store them in a fire safe when not actively backing up or need constant access.

        • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Fireproof safes are for paper, not drives or tape.

          They work by having a material in the walls that breaks down from heat, keeping the interior cool enough for paper.

          I wouldn’t trust that without some kind of testing.

          • sparky1337@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Well, honestly they’re not really good for anything. Most manufacturers use a bake type method, which is not in anyway comparable to a house engulfed in actual flames.

            As a general consumer, this is about the best you can do. Put whatever in a “fireproof” bag inside a “fireproof” safe and you might save your data in the event of a fire.

            It’s the same thing about gun “safes”. They’re not really safes unless you spend big money. Like $10,000+. Otherwise they’re categorized as “residential containers”.

            I should have clarified whether or not my answer was in response to “is it possible” instead of “is it recommended”.