• tuhriel@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m happy to dunk on musk as much as the next guy, but that title is bull.

    Lightyears measure distance not time, how can they mess that up?

    • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because he’s a long way away. Longer than miles away…maybe…light years?

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 months ago

      Musk <-------------------------------- LYs -----------------------------------> Self-Driving car

      Any questions?

      • k_rol@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Your point doesn’t help me because it shows that we can fold space-time to create a shortcut with warp technology. Reference.

      • 4dpuzzle@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s extremely nuanced. ‘Light years ahead’ is correct since you are thinking about a race where one competitor is a long distance ahead of others. On the other hand, ‘light years away’ doesn’t make sense, since we think of achievements in terms of time needed, rather than distance.

        • ji17br@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          You’ve never heard the term miles ahead?

          Tommy is miles ahead of Timmy in math class.

          Clearly not referring to distance but it absolutely makes sense.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think the headcanon is that the shortest distance is impressive.
        Either a different faster and harder route through “the kessel”. Or that 12 parsecs is the absolute minimum distance it can be done in, perfectly apexing every corner.

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          yeah honestly I know the answer even though I did the joke. the star wars mythical travel requires hyperspace navigation where objects still exist in it and the nav computer is basically plotting the smallest safe distance (or something like that). Basically all speed in hyperspace is the same its just about the route. Its basically explained in the original movie when han says (spoilers ahead /s):

          “Traveling through hyperspace ain’t like dusting crops, boy! Without precise calculations we could fly right through a star or bounce too close to a supernova and that’d end your trip real quick, wouldn’t it?”

        • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Or it’s a roundabout way of saying he cheated: “I finished the marathon in 22 miles!” :D

    • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Maybe he needs 6.706e+8 miles more data

      Edit, more math: that’s 8.9 million hours of data at 75mph, or about 2 more hours of data per Tesla (at 75mph).

      I’m actually surprised that musk doesn’t talk about how many light years have been traveled.

      Edit: first number was wrong? My TI89 is upstairs, so I’m trusting search engines

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You have to read the title in context of millennial journalism title convention.

      It is tiring, you aint wrong but there is context on why it makes sense tho

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That just means it has to be created in space.

      I just made the Kessel Run in twelve parsecs.