Pretty much what it says on the tin, but for more context. My friends and I use Discord to play D&D and other TTRPGs. We also use it to send memes and just have conversations. We mostly do the chat, text, images, gifs, etc. But we also use the voice and video chat pretty regularly too. Screen share sometimes as well. So I’d like to try to find something that has all those features if possible.

The new ID or facial recognition requirement they are implementing is a deal breaker for a few of us, and so if I can set up some kind of alternative to make it a non-issue, I’d like to.

I’m running Ubunutu 22.04 LETS, AMD 3700X, 64GBRAM, 10x 6TB HDD, and and 2 4TB NVmE. Have a 2gb up/down internet connection. So I don’t think we should have any issues making it work smoothly for 7 people.

  • Actionschnils@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    21 minutes ago

    We switched to element (matrix-protocol) a while ago. Until now it worked fine for us - without any real problems. It already got a native voice/video-call implementation. But i heard that selfhosting isnt that smooth

    https://element.io/de

    • petersr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I feel like Matrix has gotten a lot of hate the last year or so. Don’t really know why. Perhaps people see it as being misguided.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Yeah, self-hosting it can be a bear, especially since you need to deal with the whole “bots trying to kill it will regularly post CSAM in random channels, and if any of your users are in that channel it will federate to your own server and now you have CSAM saved on your server’s cache” stuff. It’s the same problem that Lemmy was dealing with during Reddit’s APIcolypse. You can always choose not to federate, but that largely defeats the point of the protocol existing in the first place.

      You also need to set up TURN servers to get functional voice/video calls. WebRTC (like voice/video calling) tends to throw a fit without some sort of TURN functionality. That’s something the average Joe won’t know how to do, and is typically going to require a paid tier from some external host like Cloudflare.

      Edit: I looked it up. Cloudflare offers TURN servers, with the first 1000GB for free each month, but then it charges for use after that. But that does mean a server that gets used for video calls more than a few hours per month could end up incurring costs. Because that TURN server would be handling all of the video streaming data, so it will quickly eat that 1000GB limit. It also means true self-hosting is prohibitively difficult, as you’d be tying yourself to an external provider unless you go out of your way to host your own TURN server.

  • TerHu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I‘ve been looking into this a bit and whilst i haven’t really tried any of the alternatives, i did collect some notes:

    possible contenders

    • zulip
      • apache-2.0 self hosted more work focussed
    • stoatchat (formerly revolt)
      • AGPL-3 self hosted
    • teamspeak
      • proprietary … self hosted older ts3 with ts6 announced
    • mumble
      • license seems foss - self hosted
    • spacebar
      • AGPL-3 self hosted
    • return to irc or xmpp

    probably no

    DO NOT

    • mattermost
      • play stupid games, win stupid prices
    • guilded
      • owned by roblox
    • slack
    • discord
    • ventrilo
      • proprietary - not selfhosted - no linux

    please let me know what y’all think

  • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Something that wasn’t posted here yet but I just got told about: https://fluxer.app/

    A chat platform that answers to you, not investors. It’s ad-free, open source, community-funded, and never sells your data or nags you with upgrade pop-ups.

    Over time, we’d love to explore optional monetisation tools that help creators and communities earn, with a small, transparent fee that keeps the app sustainable.

  • Wawe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I replaced Discord(and Whatsapp) with Matrix/Element as voice chat (and general chat) with my wife. I remember running it with Docker was bit annoying to set up (I was selfhosting beginner when first doing it now it could be easier), but with Yunohost it is one click install (if you are willing with swap operating server).

    Nextcloud Talk could work for your needs, but I have not personally used it so hard to recommend it.

  • ℍ𝕖𝕝𝕚0𝕤@social.ggbox.fr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    My guess is that it would be difficult to find a piece of software that does all the stuff discord does. But I also think it’s a non-issue. You could split these needs onto multiple solutions. My group uses mumble for gaming voicechat, Signal for group conversations, and a simple rtmp server for streaming. We don’t need nor use discord and never did.

    I like the idea of a single piece of software that does one job well instead of a giant powerhouse that does everything.

    • loiakdsf@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      i also have a mumble server but every once in a while we need streaming. what is your rtmp setup? i am thinking of mediamtx, but am annoyed by having to post the link to the stream every time and everyone needs to resize windows manually to fit all on ome screen.

      • ℍ𝕖𝕝𝕚0𝕤@social.ggbox.fr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Nothing fancy, I just run this docker image which allows streaming to via OBS, and we can watch the streams with VLC. I’m sure there are better ways to do it but that works well enough for us. Do note that a few seconds of latency is to be expected with RTMP.

  • ollie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    matrix is unreasonably hard to set-up, why doesnt the docker container or the compose include voice chat? i cant even sign up for stoat to try it out… is this the best we have against discord in the big 26 😭

    • carrylex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Voice chat works out of the box with Matrix.

      It uses WebRTC and tries to do P2P connections. Note that this leaks your IP to the other caller and vice versa, but it’s also quite fast as you can establish a direct connection.

      If P2P fails it will try to fallback to your configured TURN server and use that one for relaying.

      However not every instance has one (as TURN servers are usually not that modern and straight forward…) and if this is the case it will fallback to Matrix’s global TURN servers.

    • aksdb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      XMPP is also still a thing and IMO much easier to host (at least ejabberd is). Look into Movim, which looks quite nice as a discord replacement on top of XMPP.

    • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Setting up Element Call on my instance was difficult on its own, I understand why Synapse doesn’t come with it out of the box, essentially you spin up Matrix’s JWT service for authenticating clients and it if approved forwards the connection to the Livekit ports which must be opened on your firewall (ie port forwarded), otherwise people will not be able to connect to calls.

      Big PITA and in my experience, on my home network, can conflict with games with VOIP chats so don’t follow the default 50000:55000 port range Livekit recommends or you’ll run into issues like I did, each person consumes 2 ports so adjust the range to your need.


      Edit: I don’t suggest running Element Call standalone, it has issues of its own, once you get Livekit and JWT running and follow This guide you should have your element call support in Synapse now, pro-tip for those running synapse behind docker and get confused on the whole ./well-known part of the documentation you can edit your ./well-known in your homeserver.yaml file like such:

      serve_server_wellknown: true
      
      extra_well_known_client_content:
        optional: client
        "org.matrix.msc4143.rtc_foci": [
            {
                "type": "livekit",
                "livekit_service_url": "https://livekit-jwt.your.domain/"
            }
        ]
      
  • Greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The main issue is you’ll never get the cretins that use it off it. Communities… they’re just sitting there burning the library of alexandria… all the esoteric knowledge they’re “putting on discord” is just gonna vanish.

    over a billion in vc funding and discord is as shit as it is.

    • icosahedron@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      yes i second matrix. it’s different from discord in a lot of ways, but it’s still a pretty seamless transition. for anyone who wants to host matrix, i recommend the continuwuity homeserver software. it’s much easier to host than synapse and is significantly faster for 99% of use cases

      if you’re just trying use matrix, i prefer cinny over element for the client. cinny’s ui is also very similar to discord’s and it handles space/room grouping very intuitively. there’s also fluffychat (less feature rich) and schildichat (element fork), among others. however, element is currently the only client which fully supports voice chat

      for instances, i recommend choosing something other than matrix.org. right now, matrix is barely decentralized because the vast majority of users choose matrix.org, which isn’t great. also matrix.org collects a lot of data and requires more information to register than most servers. some other good public instances are:

      there are also many, many smaller public instances, but it’s probably better to choose a relatively big one for moderation reasons. a lot of people think matrix is dead or no one uses it, but there are plenty of active communities if you know where to look

      for your friends who refuse to quit discord for some reason, matrix’s ecosystem also has lots of bridges. if you’re willing to self host, i recommend out of your element. the only caveat is that it doesn’t support e2ee rooms

      • Hazematman@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        If OP wants voice and video chat like they say they’d have to host synapse and use element afaik.i don’t think any of the other home servers support matrix calling. Cinny and fluffychat don’t support voice or video calls. Fluffychat has it as an “option” but it’s currently broken last time I tried it. Schildi chat might work for voice and video since it’s an element fork. I’ve not tried it so I don’t know for sure.

        • icosahedron@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          element call is a standalone service (call.element.io) that the client just integrates really well. since it’s not actually part of the homeserver deployment, it should work fine even without synapse. that said, it means traffic passes through a third party server unless element call and the client are also self hosted. but yes, you’re right that other clients currently do not support calling. luckily, cinny is relatively close to merging a PR that adds it

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Can confirm, I host Matrix (homeserver synapse) and Element. Voice is a pain to get set up but I hear there are other matrix services which will do this for you easier. It’s a process though. You can get text chat up in a day, voice is going to be a bit after that, a lot of tinkering.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        Dito (Synapse server), Element for desktop app and fruitphones, Shildichat for android (its lighter and has an adorable turtle as a mascot).

        And seconding the voice coms, the VOIP relay server is a huge pain to set up, same with the registration page. My nerd herd hosts a few services that federated to share services and the admin group just issues people accounts.

        TLDR: no… Were not using discord anymore, we have discord at home.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Rocket.chat would be my first recommendation, tho it looks more corporate aimed. It also claims to support Matrix federation.

    You could also give Jami a try, it’s p2p so it doesn’t need servers.

    • clif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      RocketChat is pretty easy to setup with docker. I couldn’t get it to work in podman after many, many hours of trying despite the documentation saying it does. They have a dedicated podman doc page but I just hit problem after problem after problem. I was trying to do it with the containerized mongo as a PoC though - a lot of problems came from that (mongo connection). Maybe I’ll try again with a “real” db server. Root cause seemed to be networking differences between docker and podman.

      I found it really odd that your server has to get a registration key from their server… That part weirds me out.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I found it really odd that your server has to get a registration key from their server

        Huh, I didn’t know that, maybe that’s only with the docker image? If not, that’s bad news waiting to happen, I’m afraid :/

        • clif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Looks like you called it. Seems the container image(s) default to a subscription plan (“Starter”, free for <50 users) but apparently you can revert to the “Community Edition” which gets rid of it.

          Found this post over at the place we no longer speak of :

          Hello, I’m Gabriel Engel, the founder of Rocket.Chat. I want to clarify that there is no new limitation for community use. We’ve recently introduced a plan offering all enterprise features for free to groups with fewer than 25 users. For those with more users, you have the opportunity to try the enterprise features. After the trial period, the system will automatically revert to the community version. However, you have the option to bypass the trial in the admin settings. I emphasize that we are not imposing any restrictions; instead, we’re providing the enterprise version free to small teams and inviting larger teams to experience it. Let’s view this as the positive initiative it is. For more details, please visit our forum: https://forums.rocket.chat/t/introducing-the-starter-plan-free-access-to-premium-features-for-limited-scale-use/18736

          In the admin settings for your instance you can go to the “Subscription” panel and down at the veeeery bottom is a “Cancel Subscription” button (I’m on the free “starter” subscription, apparently). I’m assuming that’s how you back out of it.

          Once I have a chance to warn users that I’m about to do something potentially dramatic, I’ll test it out and see what happens.

          EDIT: Also found this in the RC forums (from 2 years ago) :

          Note, if you upgrade or install new version of RC, it will automatically put you at a Starter or Pro plan, to go to the community, go to Admin settings, remove the key and it will put you back to the Community version… It took me a while to figure this out :slight_smile:

          O, and the immediate next post is what I described above :

          I believe community is still available within v6.6.0, but new instllation will put you automatically to the Starter Plan. You need to cancel subscription going to Setting → Subscription → Cancel Subscription