• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    So hands up everyone. Who’s consuming so much mustard that they have to replenish their supply on a monthly basis? Quite frankly you lot are weird

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    “poor people shouldn’t be able to afford food because I’m irresponsible with my money”

    … That’s what this sounds like.

    If you’re not “poor enough” to need snap, and you can’t afford to buy whatever food you want, within reason, then either, you need snap and you’re in denial, or you need to learn money management.

    Snap recipients are forced to spend the money on food, since that’s the only place that money can be spent AFAIK… So they’re forced to be responsible with their food money. They can’t use the funds to get drunk at the pub and stumble down the street picking fights and ending up in the drunk tank.

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I love the idiocy of the view that the poorest among us are eating like kings for free while we all suffer and toil for peanuts. I mean, how dumb do you have to be? I’ve got a steal of a deal on some property on mars you may be interested in.

    • jtj4135@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I have MAGA family. The first thing they always mention about SNAP is how “welfare queens” are gaming the system, even though they were all on food stamps at one point. It’s purely all about racism and punching down. They don’t like the idea of black and brown people eating on “their” taxdollars. However, when my brother was on food stamps, it was out of “necessity” because he relied on SNAP to feed his step children.

      • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Same, overheard one day they are paying immigrants $3000 a month to not work. Like what in the actual fuck is wrong with these people? That doesn’t hold up to even the slightest bit of scrutiny. But there’s no reasoning with people who lack any form of it.

        • jtj4135@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s definitely infuriating. Anything is “true” in their land of make believe…

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That’s how my dad was. He was the one only one who actually needed food stamps; everybody else was cheating the system. As far as I could tell, it wasn’t about race because he’d talk shit about other white people who used food stamps, too.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Whole discussion is about " I can only afford 1/3 price generic mustard, but SNAP recipients are spoiled"

    SNAP funds can also be used to buy cheap mustard to stetch limited SNAP budget.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It also bothers me that there’s the implication that poor people don’t deserve any luxuries. As if being poor is a moral failing, so you should suffer.

      Of course, what’s really absurd is the trillions of dollars the US spends on military bullshit every year, not the fact that some unemployed worker might be able to buy top-shelf mustard.

    • NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Maybe? An ex from NC introduced me to putting Sweet Hot Mustard on summer sausage + cheese + Ritz cracker, and damn. It added like, 3 points in tastiness (on a 10 point scale).

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh yes, the classic “the poor people are secretly happy and that bothers me” argument. It’s like a cat call for stupid people. The whole point of it is to say “you’re not allowed to have anything remotely nice because I consider myself better than you.”

    It’s mental illness made into a political platform.

  • Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yellow mustard is not less fancy. It’s yellow because it has turmeric in it. That’s more ingredients and it’s one of those fancy unique spices.

    The reason it’s cheap is because Americans like the flavor of turmeric in their mustard so some companies have made a cheap version of it.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Dijon mustard is yellow? Isn’t it not only the classic mustard but also (if it’s made as it should, anyone can make “Dijon mustard” IIRC) made without any special additives?

      • Donkter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Sorry, maybe my post was confusing. Dijon is the one that doesn’t have turmeric and isn’t yellow, the bright yellow ballpark mustard does.

          • Donkter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Oh I see, sorry I agree most mustard is a little yellow. I was just contrasting it to ballpark mustard yeah.

    • Bone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Plus, different mustards for different foods. I like a yellow with a lot of things, but on a hotdog is pretty classic. I like a spicy brown mustard with some chicken. And maybe a stoneground for a deli sandwich. Chinese mustard from some restaurants, like with spring rolls, is also quite the treat at times, if you like the spice level! I’m hungry.

  • ultranaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    274
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Grey Poupon is not fancy mustard. You can buy that shit in any grocery store, it was developed by food scientists and is mass produced in giant semi-automated factories. It’s also not particularly expensive. If you can only afford yellow mustard but not Grey Poupon you shouldn’t be buying any mustard because your budget is way too tight to be paying for condiments you can get free in a fast food restaurant.

  • immobile7801@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They charge for the blue checkmarks? And…people do it? I haven’t had xitter since years before nazi boy bought it.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, it was one of the more contreversial changes he did. Before, you had to be “vetted” by xitter staff as being both notable and who you said you were. That wasn’t a great system, and was effectively a nepotism/who you knew game, but you wouldn’t see blue checkmarks for fake accounts.

      It used to be a sign of trustworthiness.

      Now anyone can get one for a monthly fee.

      • dandelion (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        what I find shocking is that the website still exists and has so many users; I even know a user IRL who hasn’t noticed it has gotten any worse since Elon took over …

      • balsoft@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Before, you had to be “vetted” by xitter staff as being both notable and who you said you were.

        This made me think of an easy-ish way to do it for the fediverse:

        1. You must have a Wikidata page, with at least one Wikipedia page associated with that Wikidata page
        2. On the Wikidata page, you must have a P4033 property with that account
        3. Add some ActivityPub metadata for “Account owner’s Wikidata Item”
        4. When there’s a two way correspondance (Fediverse Account <-> Wikidata entry), show a Wikipedia logo which brings you to the corresponding Wikipedia article about the person.
    • monogram@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Unpopular opinion but I think the blue checkmark as a way to show that you support the platform isn’t a bad idea, that it replaced a verification system was the actual issue.

      Voyager shows usernames in purple when they are a contributor to their app.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        the blue checkmark as a way to show that you support the platform isn’t a bad idea

        The premise of how it works is fine, it’s the supporting the platform part that’s the problem

  • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is just a totally brain dead take. Maybe the SNAP recipient likes brown mustard and prioritizes it. And you don’t care that much so you don’t prioritize it. If it mattered to you, you would budget to get fancy mustard.

    If you really do feel you can’t afford fancy mustard, you shouldn’t be mad at the person who earns food assistance and then uses it to buy fancy mustard, you should be mad that you aren’t making enough to afford fancy mustard.

    • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s also like $4 to get a bottle of Gray Poupon, absolutely ridiculous to be trying to whip people into a frenzy over that to begin with.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 hours ago

        that is how conservatives do it, tan suit, hot dog, djoin mustard, sipping from a cup. they always trying to find some thing they can complain about, which is anything.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is not the first time Republicans threw an absolute shit fit over negligibly more expensive mustard…

        • Jay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          …while blowing hundreds or even thousands of dollars on red hats and overpriced campaign souvenirs.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Because in their minds, these people should be suffering more. Government food assistance should take the form of gruel, if it exists at all.

          Edit: Oh I just realized what you were referencing lol

    • hanrahan@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is just a totally brain dead take.

      Well yeah, they’re complaining about people who receive SNAP benefits, so that’s a given.

    • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, it’s not like SNAP users get a discount on “fancy” mustard, they just get use their government-given food money to buy whatever kind of food they want instead of the government policing how they are allowed to use their food money.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Theres the rub. The working class and poor have been indoctrinated to believe that they are their own enemies, and the puppet masters that orchestrated all of this class warfare are the rich to keep us busy from chopping their heads off.

      The poor aren’t our enemies. They are the frogs boiling in water that the rich use to determine what they can do to everyone else.