No one specific. Just the concept of the public spectacle.

  • lyth@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    10 months ago

    Besides the immediate threat of mass rioting and an armed resistance no matter who you’re flogging, public torture as entertainment is a very, very bad precedent to set, and only serves to build up a culture of antipathy. Imagine how the wider justice system would change once that’s normalized.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s basically what happened to Ghadaffi

    Going by that the answer is that Authoritarians will all double down to the point of seeking out authoritarian buffer states because now they believe that the democratic world is either conspiring to get them or a motivator to their people to kill them just by existing at all.

    • cqthca@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t know, the media silence about Iraq is about the same as it was in 1974. Who knows 🤷‍♂️

  • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    As others have said, seems like it would have a counterproductive effect.

    Punishment or inflicting pain tends to engender sympathy for the one being hurt.

    That said, sometimes political assassinations have been effective based on the criteria of the assassin. I’m reminded of the guy in Japan who shot Shinzo Abe.

  • amio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Ah, {countryName} switched out their authoritarian ruler for someone who thought FNV’s Caesar’s Legion were a pretty cool bunch.”

  • Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    10 months ago

    Jan 6th is probably a good example of how the elite would react. Everyone involved would be located, prosecuted, and locked up.