Image Transcription:

A tweet from the George Takei Twitter account which states:

"A Democrat was in the White House when my family was sent to the internment camps in 1941. It was an egregious violation of our human and civil rights.

It would have been understandable if people like me said they’d never vote for a Democrat again, given what had been done to us.

But being a liberal, being a progressive, means being able to look past my own grievances and concerns and think of the greater good. It means working from within the Democratic party to make it better, even when it has betrayed its values.

I went on to campaign for Adlai Stevenson when I became an adult. I marched for civil rights and had the honor of meeting Dr. Martin Luther King. I fought for redress for my community and have spent my life ensuring that America understood that we could not betray our Constitution in such a way ever again.

Bill Clinton broke my heart when he signed DOMA into law. It was a slap in the face to the LGBTQ community. And I knew that we still had much work to do. But I voted for him again in 1996 despite my misgivings, because the alternative was far worse. And my obligation as a citizen was to help choose the best leader for it, not to check out by not voting out of anger or protest.

There is no leader who will make the decision you want her or him to make 100 percent of the time. Your vote is a tool of hope for a better world. Use it wisely, for it is precious. Use it for others, for they are in need of your support, too."

End Transcription.

The last paragraph I find particularly powerful and something more people really should take into account.

  • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Democrats have always fucked me over but I keep voting for them because the alternative is actively more harmful”.

    No, I don’t find it touching nor powerful. This is a celebration of the failure of the 2 party system.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      When you roll out the feasible alternative let me know. Until then, I’ll be voting for the candidate whose rallies don’t break out in chants of “kill f*ggots, kill all transgenders”

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        We need to get RCV passed at the state level in at least 33 states, then we can get rid of FPTP at the federal level, and actually force some change

            • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              thinking realistically about the likelihood of getting ~= 80 million people to vote for any one third party, or thinking realistically about the likelihood of getting those two parties to agree to vote their own power away?

              • Lexi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                See, that’s the issue, you’re thinking within the bounds of voting. There’s other stuff you can do, like community outreach, or talking to local politicians, or protesting. Real change in America was never won with a vote, it was fought for on the streets.

              • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                You don’t need 80 million people to vote third party.

                What you need is enough votes to show as a big enough blip on the election results to make both the Democrats and Republicans sweat out of fear they may be losing their iron grip.

                Change will soon follow

          • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nobody said it was simple, but yes. Let’s do that.

            Doing the easy thing is what’s got us to where we are.

            • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              can you pull it off in under a year? because in a year we’re gonna have a presidential election and one of the leading candidates is someone whose already been determined by a court to have engaged in insurrection and has said that he’ll have the military suppress protests starting day one and will replace 50,000 government functionaries with people whose only qualification is that they’re loyal to him personally. his friends tell me every day that god has commanded them to kill me 😀

                • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Imagine if we’d started pushing for this in earnest 15 years ago.

                  Like they say, the second best time to plant a tree is today.

        • ALostInquirer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What might help to effect this change? If I’m not mistaken, a number of states are almost under single-party rule, particularly those that might benefit most from this kind of change.

          Is it something that may be built up from a municipal to county to state level to then establish on a national level?

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Back in the day the "Moral Majority’ took over the GOP by taking over the local offices. If the usual attendance at a meeting was twenty folks, the MMs would make sure to show up with 50. It took them a while, but they were persistent.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nice idea, but it isn’t going to happen before the 2024 elections. First things first.

        • yesman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          force some change

          RCV favors moderates and promotes political stability. That’s kinda the opposite of a revolution.

      • voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That word “feasible” is doing a lot of work. No doubt the politician I want to vote for won’t be “feasible” for some reason, and the one you want me to vote for is.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When you figure out a means of political activity that doesn’t involve refining the capitalist regime as it stands, let me know. Until then, I won’t be voting for candidates who help slaughter innocent people around the world.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is part of the calculus people are making when they express the idea they won’t vote for candidate A for reasons X and candidate B for reasons Y.

        It is how voters can express their political will during the primary and electoral process. If a candidate can modify their position on X or Y because of voter concerns, that would be a meaningful part of the democratic process influenced by the voters. They’re trying to forge that alternative.

        The real unfeasible alternative is actually just doing nothing and letting the donors buy their selected policies and voting for the lesser evil between them. That is just supporting the status quo.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok. And your point is? Not voting isn’t going to do shit. You are not going to change the system by not participating. That’s a losing strategy.

    • tigerhawkvok@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wrong. It’s “democrats advanced in fits and starts, sometimes stumbling and falling, but heading in the direction of the finish line. I keep voting for them because the other guys are trying to set off a dirty bomb on the race track.”

    • Algaroth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      World’s oldest current democracy. It also has all the oldest flaws. USA and UK are stuck with a system that will always end up with two parties filled with wildly different politicians. Biden and AOC are both democrats. Trump and Romney are both republicans. What does each party stand for? Who the fuck knows? Republicans haven’t stood for anything for the last 10 years or so. Democrats have countered all that with “being normal and not rocking the boat”. Democrats are acting like your mom after her boyfriend beat her. “We can work something out later when we’ve all calmed down”.

      What is really happening today is that the US has one party with politicians who actually do the job. The other party is an insane asylum where the craziest bitch gets the most attention. This means that every time one party has a popular vote the other party gets even more insane. And the first party, not wanting to alienate voters try meet half way. This is like your mom begging you to talk to your stepdad after he beat your sister. That’s how America got so far into neoliberalism, fascism and one election away from dictatorship. Multi party system works because it forces compromise and even if the government changes it won’t swing as hard as it did after Obama.

      • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Democrats are acting like your mom after her boyfriend beat her. “We can work something out later when we’ve all calmed down”.

        This is like your mom begging you to talk to your stepdad after he beat your sister

        I hope this isn’t character development.

    • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Winner takes it all it the biggest bullshit ever. Anything but popular vote is worth jack shit.