howdy@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 hours agowomenlemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1292arrow-down115
arrow-up1277arrow-down1external-linkwomenlemmy.mlhowdy@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 hours agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 hours agoNo. Go big or go home.
minus-squareLost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 hours agoNo. They’re saying that 93% + 93% = 186%.
minus-squareQuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-23 hours agowell if 93% is currently 10,000 murders, then women doing 10,000 murders would hypothetically turn it to 50% edit: well maybe like 57% because they already have the other 7%? but it would be lower because there is more total? I confused myself
Wouldn’t it be 50%?
No. Go big or go home.
No. They’re saying that 93% + 93% = 186%.
well if 93% is currently 10,000 murders, then women doing 10,000 murders would hypothetically turn it to 50%
edit: well maybe like 57% because they already have the other 7%? but it would be lower because there is more total? I confused myself