“You went to an elite school, and you studied philosophy; hopefully you have some other skill,” he warned, adding that AI “will destroy humanities jobs.”

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 hour ago

    We “peasants” are the only reason the filthy rich have what they have, including food, and clean water to drink. They need us, we don’t need them.

    Fuck these useless leeches. Billionaires should not exist.

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    Posting clickbait is almost as bad as writing clickbait.

    We want to be informed, not have our emotions manipulated for ad revenue.

  • Bakkoda@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Murder the elite with my bare hands? Welp guess i need to start working out.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      I wouldn’t bother. They’re generally soft and weak. They didn’t get rich working hard. You can whup them.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    41 minutes ago

    Whenever any one of these assholes opens their yap in public, the only response they should hear back is, “You need us. We don’t need you. Shut the fuck up.”

  • OR3X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    These morons really think AI is going to allow them to replace the technical folks. The same technical folks they severely loathe because they’re the ones with the skills to build the bullshit they dream up, and as such demand a higher salary. They’re so fucking greedy that they are just DYING to cut these people out in order to make more profits. They have such inflated egos and so little understanding of the actual technology they really think they’re just going to be able to use AI to replace technical minds going forward. We’re on the precipice of a very funny “find out” moment for some of these morons.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      They don’t even dream it up any more. They hire brains, sift through their ideas, and say “I like that. Do that.”

      After that, they are experts in manipulating finances to makes their companies rich, and themselves richer, by paying the people who actually do the work, make the money, and create the shareholder value, as little as possible.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      I think these guys forget that ai is just a program written by drumroll please HUMANS. Sure we could shitcan every programmer and replace them with “vibe coders” and skate by for a year or two but when bugs crop up and backend issues pile up AI is not gonna unfuck the mess they created and it will require human intervention. If these pricks do away with the technical folk well get to that point and suffer a technological collapse because everybody that knew how to code fled or changed careers so they could pay rent.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The scary part is how it already somewhat is.

      My friend is currently(or at least considering) job hunting because they added AI to their flow and it does everything past the initial issue report.

      the flow is now: issue logged -> AI formats and tags the issue -> AI makes the patch -> AI tests the patch and throws it back if it doesn’t work -> AI lints the final product once working -> AI submits the patch as pull.

      Their job has been downscaled from being the one to organize, assign and work on code to an over-glorified code auditor who looks at pull requests and says “yes this is good” or “no send this back in”

      • PrejudicedKettle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I feel like so much LLM-generated code is bound to deteriorate code quality and blow out of the context size to such an extent that the LLM is eventually gonna become paralyzed

        • Pika@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I do agree, LLM generated code is inaccurate, which is why they have to have the throw it back in stage and a human eye looking at it.

          They told me their main concern is that they aren’t sure they are going to properly understand the code the AI is spitting out to be able to properly audit it (which is fair), then of course any issue with the code will fall on them since it’s their job to give final say of “yes this is good”

          • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 minutes ago

            At that point they’re just the responsibility circuit breaker, put there to get the blame if things go wrong.

    • Insekticus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      Just … please.

      I beg ANYONE … if you see billionaires getting lynched in the streets, FILM IT!

      I wanna put some funny Benny HIll music on a video of people chasing Elon around with a pitchforks and torches and eventually getting him.

      Imagine seeing Larry Fink from Blackrock with horses tied to his arms and legs and run in four different directions and having The Final Countdown play, and watch him turn into red mist when the best drops hard.

      Or Dontard Dump dropped into a large woodchipper with “you spin me right round baby” playing as the razor sharp teeth spin.

    • dukemirage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      These morons really think AI is going to allow them to replace the technical folks.

      This specific moron was actually talking about people with a humanities degree.

      • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Even less plausible. There was a paper published recently arguing that by design LLMs are quite literally incapable of creativity. These predictive statistical models represent averages. They always and only generate the most banal outputs. That’s what makes them useful.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago
      1. The rich fully intend to replace workers with slaves one way or another.

      2. AI robots can be utter shit and they will still be leaps and bounds more efficient than the task specific automation that has been replacing human workers for decades.

      3. As long as the rich maintain their monopolies quality of service can drop indefinitely. Doesn’t matter if AI robots suck ass when no human employed company can compete and every other option is just as ass.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        AI robots can be utter shit and they will still be leaps and bounds more efficient than the task specific automation that has been replacing human workers for decades.

        I disagree with this, and we already have live examples today that are good analogs. Youtube is being flooded with AI generated slop. AI generated scripts, read by AI generated voices, over top of AI generated images.

        I never seek these out, and actively avoid them when I can tell what they are before clicking on them. In that first 2 seconds of AI generated voice, I can tell this is slop and stop watching it seeking a human generated video instead.

        As long as the rich maintain their monopolies quality of service can drop indefinitely. Doesn’t matter if AI robots suck ass when no human employed company can compete and every other option is just as ass.

        It can’t. At some point the quality of the product drops to a level it is no longer a product. Lets say we’re in your theoretical dystopian future where the monopoly exists for cookies. There is no other place to buy cookies except from the monopoly. You posit that quality can drop indefinitely as there is zero alternative sources for cookies. So lets say the monopoly cookie brand was deciding to substitute some of the wheat flower with sawdust as a cost saving measure with the consequence being yet lower quality cookies. At a tiny fraction of sawdust you may notice it, but the sawdust cookie may still be better than no cookie. The monopoly continues to increase the sawdust content until the cookie contains zero wheat flour and is entirely substituted with sawdust. I believe even you would concede you would no longer buy the sawdust cookies at this point. Further, you would have stopped buying them earlier when the sawdust content became so high that the cookie was inedible to you even though it contained some wheat flour at that point.

        This same thing will apply to Youtube. If the only thing left to watch on youtube is AI slop because no human creators exist, then there is no point in watching youtube anymore.

        The point here, is that even with a monopoly on a product, as soon as the quality drops below a certain threshold (and this point is different for every consumer), the product stops being a product to them.

        • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          And yet youtube is still the dominant video host.

          You’re missing the point entirely. If instead of luxuries you look through the lens of necessities perhaps you’ll see.

          Like replace cookies with bread and try tell me people will choose to starve first. Like obviously not.

          You’re just too priveledged to realize what I’m describing has been going on in developing countries for decades.

          Ask a ford employee 30 years ago about robot automation. Like this is not a new thing in the 2020s. The rich have a playbook for this.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I know you don’t necessarily mean it this way, but there’s a very interesting (and infuriating) history to why the US reveres the wealthy. The short version is that the ultra wealthy were pissed about the New Deal, so they used fundamentalist Christianity to tie the idea of wealth to holy favor from Yahweh.

      We will have to overcome that idea if we hope to gain real class consciousness.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The short version is that the ultra wealthy were pissed about the New Deal, so they used fundamentalist Christianity to tie the idea of wealth to holy favor from Yahweh.

        That concept existed WAY before the United State did.

        The old idea was kings were rich because they were ordained to be kings by god. Questioning why the king was rich was questioning the word of god and punishable by death.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Sure, but why it exists today in the US is a direct result of the robber barons’ influence in the early 1900s. The core idea isn’t new, but this instance is.

    • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Because most Americans with slack jaws hunch over their smartphone gawking at tiktok videos of people they hope to one day be but never will.

      • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        “mOsT aMeRiCaNs…”

        Blah, blah, blah. If you can tell me how to un-fuck this nation in a way that will actually wake people up, I’m all ears. But the way I see it, these things were insidiously marketed to the whole country slowly and incrementally, like frog in a slowly warming pot of water. Those of us who jumped out of the pot are watching in horror as the rest get boiled alive.

        The problem is, frogs don’t have opposable thumbs and we can’t turn the gas off - so the pot keeps boiling.

        • foodandart@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The best you and I can do is to look out for each other, our friends and family and help anyone else that manages to escape the pot as quickly as possible so they don’t get back in…

          My thoughts are that people are animals and they’ll follow where the majority go, so keep helping others escape the pot and eventually, more will notice there is an exit option and jump as well.

          • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 hours ago

            At the moment, I see this as the only real answer. Until there’s proper organization and resistance, everything is lip service.

            Mobilization is easy - the protests and marches get people together in solidarity. But organization takes effort: it takes talking to people, getting numbers/contact info, making plans and deciding what’s next…

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          If you can tell me how to un-fuck this nation in a way that will actually wake people up

          People are already Woke Up. They’re still powerless.

          • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yeah right. Almost half the people I talk to are not happy but are burning their heads in the sand and waiting/hoping for this to blow over. It can’t happen here and all that.

        • danh2os@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          This doesn’t happen in a bubble though. We need those people too. We need each other.

      • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Really feeling the victim blaming here when they made the devices into virtual heroine

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Whatcha gonna do about them?

      It’s not like I invite any of them over to smoke a joint. They exist and I can’t do much about it

  • BillyClark@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Assume for a moment that AI really was taking all of these types of jobs, which by the way, almost certainly includes CEOs. It would only be a matter of time before robots take those other jobs he’s talking about.

    A normal human of normal intelligence would see that and conclude that people simply wouldn’t have to work anymore. And that therefore, everyone should have their basic necessities taken care of by their governments.

    People would be free to do whatever they want, whether it be “humanities” work or creating things or whatever. We’re no longer constrained by the fact that our lives depend on our usefulness in jobs to the ruling class.

    Only a member of that ruling class would see themselves as indispensable and others as slave labor.

    • Asafum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The problem is ownership.

      These scumbags own all the means to produce and will demand compensation for their products. The one thing I don’t understand is if these fucks remove all the workers then who has money to buy their products? There isn’t an infinite demand for electricians, plumbers, carpenters etc etc… so there are going to be a lot of people without the means to earn a living.

      I think the ownership class is thinking of revising “let them eat cake” into “let them eat dirt. We have no need for them.”

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        There goal is to push people back to serfdom. They don’t care if the common man lives in a house or a shack. They don’t care if they can afford a car or have to walk. Their goal is to amass enough wealth (not just money), so they can bribe people to do what they want because they’ll be desperate. Robots, AI and Automation will cover the rest of it. They just need to keep a much smaller group happy who would become slightly better but still fearing they could lose everything.

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I think the ownership class is thinking of revising “let them eat cake” into “let them eat dirt. We have no need for them.”

        In the budding K-Economy, that seems to be the case. The objectively wealthy now make up something like 60% of consumer spending. It seems to be reaching the point that the majority of people can’t make enough money to even be considered vital to the economy.

      • BillyClark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Whatever bad shit I want to say about Henry Ford, at least he understood the basic idea that people could only spend the amount of money that they have or make. That’s one of the things he’s famous for is that his factory workers could buy their own Model Ts.

        We now live in a stupid reality where the world is controlled by rich people who see others as slaves and who are wanting to keep slave labor in perpetuity, even when the labor doesn’t need to exist.

      • dandylion@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        there is no owner OR the only owner of anything would be the creator, unless the owned is someone with their own will.

        interesting to translate this ownership topic to anything - earth, space, buildings, art, AI

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 hours ago

    He’d best hope the work those hands ends up doing isn’t pulling him by the hair to the scaffold.

  • Waphles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    They have always looked down on peasants, nothing has changed. Wait until their techno peasants require more electricity and water than their old meat peasants.

  • Teal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m proud to be able to work with my hands and so should anyone else who does. It doesn’t matter if it’s for a job or just around your home. Never too late to learn.

    Better to know how to do for yourself instead of being a helpless dick like Alex Karp and his Ancient Aliens theory hairdo.