If you ask ChatGPT, it says it’s guidelines include not giving the impression it’s a human. But if you ask it be less human because it is confusing you, it says that would break the guidelines.
That might end like the cookie popups in the eu…
But Peter Thiel said regulating AI will bring the biblical apocalypse. ƪ(˘⌣˘)ʃ
How do you enforce this
What if it’s foreign AI ?
Seems reasonable to me. If you’re using AI then you should be required to own up to it. If you’re too embarrassed to own up to it, then maybe you shouldn’t be using it.
I’m stoked to see the legal definition of “AI”. I’m sure the lawyers and costumed clowns will really clear it all up.
Prosecution: “Your Honor, the definition of artificial is ‘made or produced by human beings rather than occurring naturally,’ and as all human beings are themselves produced by human beings, we are definitionally artificial. Therefore, the actions of an intelligent human are inherently AI.”
Defense: “The defense does not argue this point, as such. However, our client, FOX News, could not be said to be exhibiting ‘intelligence.’ Artificial they may be, but AI they are clearly not. We rest our case.”
What about my if else AI algorithm?
It’s not really an llm
Its insane how a predictive chat bot model is called AI
I mean, we call the software that runs computer players in games AI, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The AI chatbot brainrot is way worse tbh.someone legit said to me why don’t chatgpt cure cancer like wtf
As if taking all of 4-chan, scrambling it around a little, and pouring the contents out would lead to a cure for cancer. lmao
Do we? Aren’t they just bots? Like I’m not looking at an NPC and calling it AI.
USA is run by capitalist grifters. There is no objective meaning under this regime. It’s all just misleading buzzwords and propaganda.
Marketing
Yeah for real, what does this mean exactly? All forms of machine learning? That’s a lot of computers at this moment, it’s just we only colloquially call the chat bot versions “AI”. But even that gets vague do reactive video game NPCs get counted as “AI?” Or all of our search algorithms and spell check programs?
At that point what’s the point? The disclosure would become as meaningless as websites asking for cookies or the number of things known to cause cancer in the state of California.
Will someone please tell California that “AI” doesn’t exist?
This is how politicians promote a grift by pretending to regulate it.
Worthless politicians making worthless laws.
If I’m not AI, can I lie and pretend that I’m AI? I’m AI, btw.
What if I just use AI to generate all my content and then put an intern in a chair to launder it as original human thoughts?
#JobCreator
Now that’s smart!
Weird how California keeps being the most progressive state in the US.
It’s like being the best smelling turd in a toilet, but at least it’s something.
bleep bloop… I am a real human being who loves doing human being stuff like breathing and existing
How about butt stuff?
garbage in, garbage out
Nice
So does the EU AI act
It’s comforting to know that politicians in the EU also have no clue what “AI” is.
Why do you say that
My LinkedIn feed is 80% tech bros complaining about the EU AI Act, not a single one of whom is willing to be drawn on which exact clause it is they don’t like.
They’re probably not super fond of the idea of AI not being allowed to be deployed to manipulate people.
Oh, so just like with the GDPR, cool.
Ok, my main complaint about GDPR is that I had to implement that policy on a legacy codebase and Im pretty sure I have trauma from that.
Sounds like that codebase was truly awful for user privacy then.
Incredibly so, yes.
Skill issue.
My point is higher than yours, get on my level
My LinkedIn feed
Yes… it’s so bad that I just never log in until I receive a DM, and even then I login, check it, if it’s useful I warn people I don’t use LinkedIn anymore then log out.
I even ignore DMs on linkedIn, they’re mostly head hunters anyway.
Not a terrible resource when you’re actually looking for a job. But that’s because all the automated HR intakes are a dumpster fire, more than anything headhunters bring in value.
Did you seriously use LinkedIn? I always thougt that it was just narsisitic people posting about themselves never having any real conversations and only adding superficial replies to posts that align 100% with them
Very useful for job hunting because it’s swarming with head hunters.
LinkedIn gets you access to humans who will help you navigate the shitty HR AI that most big businesses integrate into their job intake process.
If I could delete it without impacting my job or career I would. Sadly they’ve effectively got a monopoly on the online professional networking industry. Cunts
I get it though, if you’re an upstart. Having to basically hire an extra guy just to do ai compliance is a huge hit to the barrier of entry
That’s not actually the case for most companies though. The only time you’d need a full time lawyer on it is if the thing you want to do with AI is horrifically unethical, in which case fuck your little startup.
It’s easy to comply with regulations if you’re already behaving responsibly.
That’s true with many regulations. The quiet part that they’re trying to avoid saying out loud is that behaving ethically and responsibly doesn’t earn them money.
Okay, but when can the law straight up ban companies who don’t comply with the law from operating in the state instead of just slapping them on the wrist and telling them “no” the same way a pushover parent tells their child “no”. Especially after they just ignore the law.
Can’t do anything that might negatively impact business.
Are you AI? You have to tell me if you’re AI, it’s the law.
I’m required by law to inform my neighbours that I am AI.
Are you AI?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
