• PTSDwarrior@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Yes. In fact, I’ve decided to take a leap of faith and join the California National Party, which you can all check out here: CNP website. I am sick of the usual Republicans vs Democrats. Everytime one party is in power, we are constantly worrying about the loss of civil and human rights. Lets start with a clean slate. If you are a California resident, at least check out their party platform. Also, in 2026, there will be a gubernatorial candidate for CNP. His name is Sean Forbes.

  • Zaleramancer@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Wouldn’t work out. World’s too complicated for simple answers like that.

    Leaving, even if it would produce a viable nation, would involve leaving a lot of people in the lurch. There’s people in conservative states who need the counter balance of blue states to slow down their government’s trend to self destruction and fascism.

    Even though it’s increasingly frustrating with how feeble that resistance is, it does keep things like banning gay marriage in the “difficult to pass” territory and not the “a few compromises” one.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Coloradan. Only if a neighboring State does, because if not, we are neighboring other borders and we would be landlocked without food or water imports. Its either all Pacific and Front Range States agree we have to split, or none of us can.

    Our most populous cities, Denver and CO Springs, are below the mountains, and are screwed in a combat scenario.

    I don’t see Utah, Wyoming, Nevada, or Kansas doing so willingly.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      In American balkanization I imagine yall would be a battleground of the literal variety. Colorado and new Mexico would want to join Pacifica and Nevada, Arizona, Wyoming, and Montana likely won’t. But also you’re valuable enough to justify putting up a stink for

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Washingtonian here, I’ve been saying this should happen for like 8 years now lmao

    The marriage isn’t working. Let it go.

    • wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      We have had a name for it for awhile, my fellow Washingtonians call the Washington/Oregon/California union ‘Cascadia’. Wouldn’t be such a bad idea.

      • -☆-@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Fuck yeah! Cascadia! Let us stop funding this awful government and actually put our taxes towards improving people’s lives

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Absolutely, and I’m about ready to start identifying as that over American 🫠.

        I usually think of BC being part of it, too, cause we’re so similar culturally, and we hang out on each other’s side of the made up invisible line all the time.

        One can dream!

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Californian. No.

    It wouldn’t solve any problems that can’t be solved by other means, and it would create new problems that we haven’t had to worry about before. It’d be a net loss for everyone involved.

    • quetzaldilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      We’d have to spend a fortune on defense.

      We’d suffer massive losses from being cut off from interstate trade agreements.

      We’d have to deal with massive immigration issues.

      We’d probably get our shit pushed in from all the federal military bases within the state.

      I think it’s waaaay easier to just oust the current leadership and remove all the Congress members that aided and abetted.

  • BlueCollarRockstar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Indiana. We’d fail so hard and so fast that I literally cannot imagine it. People are nuts. It’d be instant MAGA-flavored Mad Max if they felt like they had an excuse to preemptively defend themselves with their guns across the countryside.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Alabama. Not enough federal money in the world to keep that state afloat.

      If they split from the Union, everyone starves.

  • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Californian here, bye Felicia. I’m fucking done with my hard earned money going towards ungrateful backwoods idiots that actively hate me, my state, and my neighbors because they’re told to by thuh teevee, yet don’t realize it. I’m done subsiding hatred for the sake of it, because “it’s the right thing to do.” I’m done being at the political whim of people that can’t spell potato. I have a lot of heart for my countrymen, but considering far too many of them hate us for reasons they don’t even understand, I don’t see the point anymore.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        If honestly be curious how that would work out. CA tends to know the value of immigration, and i couldn’t really see them holding a policy of closed borders, at least not in the long run.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Any American balkanization would likely go very similarly to the partition of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. The liberals would be given a period of permission to move to the coasts, and the conservatives to the red states, and in this process communities would shatter and a lot of people would die, but it’s better than a civil war and/or white terror.

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    This throws under the bus the many many non republicans in places gerrymandered such that the minority can continue it’s rule. My life would probably get better, but only at their expense as more and more solvent states leave the union. I’m not willing to ‘punish’ those people for the crime of being born in a impossibly corrupt district.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      I’m not so sure. Once the Republicans no longer have the democrats to fight against, they will fight against each other. This might happen as well in the leaving blue states, but I feel like the democrates don’t hold as big of a majority in most of them. So they are already used to it. And they aren’t so much the party of fire and brimstone. So more likely they would try to do all the social reforms and just fall on thier faces.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Why did democrats not stop the gerrymandering? Why are there so many laws that should not exist still there?

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        It was long and slow and by the time it was clear what was happening it was well underway.

        I’m someone who grew up in ohio as it happened and it was subtle. But we eventually passed constitutional amendments banning gerrymandering, but congress ignored us. And as it happened bit by bit we left. I stayed until it was clearly about to get unsafe for folks like me (I left a few months ago), and democrats are still fighting there. But political polarization is strong and a lot of coastal Republicans have moved in because its nearly impossible for them to lose there at this point in anything except single issue votes on constitutional amendments

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 hours ago

        And that outdated electoral college, smells like the fourth republic in france IMO.

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Because democrats have found a way to benefit from their own misuses of the law as well, so you can see how this leaves the people trying to change this with impossible choices they have to suffer consequences of even if they make the best one. It takes a lot of fight to stand up and keep pushing through that, and those are exactly the folk I’m proud to call my country-kin

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Democrats do gerrymandering too. Basically without gerrymandering, the power would shift about 4% in Democrats favor. Enough to shift power in the House, but not as much as people think.

        (That statistic comes from a video I watched a while ago, and could be wrong, so take it with a grain of salt. I’m not an authority on this matter.)

        • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I suspect politics would actually shift a huge minority amount towards “no, don’t kill the planet, my grandchildren live here”.

          The billionaire planet killers can afford to buy up and lock down two parties. I doubt they can afford to buy out everyone.

  • profgrumpypants@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No, not really. While I am not white, I am American through and through. I don’t really prefer to be something else. I just think we should fix what we can. Preferably while we can.

  • morgan423@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I don’t think the population is as hopelessly divided as the social media spaces make it out to be, but at the same time, the federal government looks more and more unrecoverable from corporate interests and back to the people every single day. It’s probably past the point of return, excepting major societal shakeup.

    It feels like there may come a point where the states that are large enough to be countries on their own start looking into any mechanisms that would allow them separation, just to be able to run themselves without federal interference and incompetence.