Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoStand your groundslrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1932arrow-down17
arrow-up1925arrow-down1external-linkStand your groundslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoLotters? Is this some vernacular I’m unfamiliar with?
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoThey attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
minus-squareTypotyper@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 months agoOr “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
minus-squarehydrospanner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoLotRers. Fans of Lord of the Rings.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoYes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoThat’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
Lotters? Is this some vernacular I’m unfamiliar with?
It says, in fact, LOπERS.
LOPIERS
WILL BE SH∞T ON SIGHT
They attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
Or “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
Wouldn’t it be loiterers?
LotRers.
Fans of Lord of the Rings.
Yes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
And wouldn’t it be shooted?
What’s a loiter?
That’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.