Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoStand your groundslrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1933arrow-down17
arrow-up1926arrow-down1external-linkStand your groundslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoLotters? Is this some vernacular I’m unfamiliar with?
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoThey attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
minus-squareTypotyper@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoOr “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
minus-squarehydrospanner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoLotRers. Fans of Lord of the Rings.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThat’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
Lotters? Is this some vernacular I’m unfamiliar with?
It says, in fact, LOπERS.
LOPIERS
WILL BE SH∞T ON SIGHT
They attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
Or “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
Wouldn’t it be loiterers?
Yes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
And wouldn’t it be shooted?
LotRers.
Fans of Lord of the Rings.
deleted by creator
That’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.