Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Stand your groundslrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1933arrow-down17
arrow-up1926arrow-down1external-linkStand your groundslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square44fedilink
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 年前They attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
minus-squareTypotyper@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 年前Or “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Yes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前That’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
They attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
Or “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
Wouldn’t it be loiterers?
Yes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
And wouldn’t it be shooted?
LotRers.
Fans of Lord of the Rings.
deleted by creator
That’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.