Burner accounts on social media sites can increasingly be analyzed to identify the pseudonymous users who post to them using AI in research that has far-reaching consequences for privacy on the Internet, researchers said.

The finding, from a recently published research paper, is based on results of experiments correlating specific individuals with accounts or posts across more than one social media platform. The success rate was far greater than existing classical deanonymization work that relied on humans assembling structured data sets suitable for algorithmic matching or manual work by skilled investigators. Recall—that is, how many users were successfully deanonymized—was as high as 68 percent. Precision—meaning the rate of guesses that correctly identify the user—was up to 90 percent.

The findings have the potential to upend pseudonymity, an imperfect but often sufficient privacy measure used by many people to post queries and participate in sometimes sensitive public discussions while making it hard for others to positively identify the speakers. The ability to cheaply and quickly identify the people behind such obscured accounts opens them up to doxxing, stalking, and the assembly of detailed marketing profiles that track where speakers live, what they do for a living, and other personal information. This pseudonymity measure no longer holds.

  • sicktriple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Humans: invents groundbreaking technologies to share information and freely associate, breaking down multiple societal barriers and creating genuine goodness in the world

    Also humans: immediately make it awful and use it to singularly subjugate nearly every living person on earth

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I think about this a lot. So many technologies that we have, if we could trust everyone involved to be acting in humanity’s best interest, would be amazing. If we didn’t have to guard our personal data like Fort Knox, there’s so many great things we could do with extensive connectedness. If we didn’t have to doubt the sincerity of everyone who promotes a service or product, everything would be so much better.

      We can’t have any of those things, because humans are shitty, and are as a whole just in it for themselves.

      • The_Sasswagon@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        We can’t have any of those things, because humans are shitty, and are as a whole just in it for themselves.

        I disagree, I don’t think humans are, as a whole, shitty. Most people are willing to do good when faced with a moral decision, even one they stand to gain from. Its just the ones that make it into seats of wealth and power aren’t part of that majority, so we see and hear about these awful people far more than the millions of good people all around us.

        In a community as wide reaching as the internet there are going to be people looking for personal gain over others and they make everyone else withdraw. I don’t think you could ever have a gathering of millions, with some actually representing corporate profit motives, and freely share without risk. But not because everyone in there wants to stab you and take your money, but because a few do and you have no idea who some of them are and one of them is Jeff Bezos and he pays you.