gigastasio@sh.itjust.works to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 5 hours agoWhat fictional animal do you think would be the most delicious?message-squaremessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up131arrow-down13
arrow-up128arrow-down1message-squareWhat fictional animal do you think would be the most delicious?gigastasio@sh.itjust.works to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 5 hours agomessage-square66fedilink
minus-squarejustdaveisfine@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 hours agoI believe one of the lines from the song is ‘stuffed with fluff’ so I don’t know, could be a little fuzzy.
minus-squarepalordrolap@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 hours agoThis. Winnie the Pooh is canonically a teddy bear, presumably only alive by some sort of magic. Likewise, Kanga, Roo, Eeyore, Tigger and Piglet. Rabbit and Owl, however, were real, living creatures - the true inhabitants of the wood - with related magic allowing them to interact. So basically, yes, Pooh isn’t edible.
I believe one of the lines from the song is ‘stuffed with fluff’ so I don’t know, could be a little fuzzy.
This. Winnie the Pooh is canonically a teddy bear, presumably only alive by some sort of magic. Likewise, Kanga, Roo, Eeyore, Tigger and Piglet.
Rabbit and Owl, however, were real, living creatures - the true inhabitants of the wood - with related magic allowing them to interact.
So basically, yes, Pooh isn’t edible.