It seems like a weird point to bring up. How often do y’all convert your measurements? It’s not even a daily thing. If I’m measuring something, I either do it in inches, or feet, rarely yards. I’ve never once had to convert feet into miles, and I can’t imagine I’m unique in this. When I have needed to, it’s usually converting down (I.e. 1/3 of a foot), which imperial does handle better in more cases.

Like. I don’t care if we switch, I do mostly use metric personally, it just seems like a weird point to be the most common pro-metric argument when it’s also the one I’m least convinced by due to how metric is based off of base 10 numbering, which has so many problems with it.

Edit: After reading/responding a lot in the comments, it does seem like there’s a fundamental difference in how distance is viewed in metric/imperial countries. I can’t quite put my finger on how, but it seems the difference is bigger than 1 mile = 1.6km

  • blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Which is fair enough. But now I’m annoyed that they keep complaining about it.

    • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      tbh… being in Canada sucks ass because of it.

      here’s a fun flowchart for Canadians and living with both

      and don’t get me started on date formatting…

      wtf is 1/4/2026. is that January, or April. who sent this… where are they located?

          • Kristell@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lolOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            HELL YEAH! This is honestly the worst part of my work. Half of the forms require YYYY-MM-DD, half do DD/MM/YYYY and having to switch is annoying, especially since personally I always use ISO-8601

        • klangcola@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Correct! And yet…

          wtf is 2026/1/4? is that January, or April. who sent this… where are they located?

          Though to be fair the chances of ISO 8601 goes up when year comes first

          • MotoAsh@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            I mean, if it’s normalized to ISO 8601, then you KNOW that’s January 4th even without dashes or slashes. (although preeeetty sure the standard would require zeros before the 1 and 4 in either case)

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        The fucking date problem I can get behind with you.

        I always use year/month/day now, which pisses off everyone but computers sort it properly every time.

      • QualifiedKitten@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oof. A good while back, I worked in a US-based company with offices globally, and they upgraded to a global ERP system. At launch of the new system, documents (such as purchase orders) printed with dates in MM/DD/YYYY format. Thankfully, my suggestion to change that to DD Mmm YYYY (eg. 31 Jan 2026) was quickly implemented without any pushback, but it totally blows my mind that a company operating globally would default to such an ambiguous date format.

      • West_of_West@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It seems to also be different between provinces. I was shopping in Ontario (from BC) and the fruit was in ounces, which threw me. And at least in BC schools cooking class uses metric not cups.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Metric is very easy to learn, so I’m not sure I’d go around flaunting that reason…

          • blarghly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It is easy to learn how to convert between metric units. But that’s not what people mean when they talk about “learning metric”. They mean having an intuitive sense for how much, say, 100 meters or 100 milliliters is. Again, the emphasis on how easy it is to remember the conversion between meters and kilometers is extraneous.

            • MotoAsh@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Yea, that’s the really easy part. It just takes exposure on a level that’s more than twice a month and it’s practically by osmosis.

              The conversions are the hard part.

          • blarghly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Same reason the metric people keep telling me to change. Because if I did, it would be better for them. Difference is, I don’t drone on and on about how superior my forms of measurement are

            • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Well that’s because it isn’t lol.

              My guess is, if the USA method was better:

              The USA would sanction countries until they adopted it. They would embed it in the national flag and insert it in the national anthem. They would make underwear out of it and put stickers on their 20yard-long cars.