Lately I’ve been noticing that the people who mainly should not have children, whether due to economic limitations, illnesses, or even mental instability, are the ones who have the most children, and many times they end up as single fathers/mothers. My question is whether it would be a good idea to implement some kind of regulation and set minimum requirements that must be met, mainly to prevent the child from ending up in the future as a criminal or a social burden due to those factors.
But what about if these dumb people end up converting to communism and then burn everything down including politicians and the whole society?
Lol you complain about “communism” but do you know that these “communists” you supposedly hate literally did the Birth Control thing and Forced Abortions and Forced Sterilizations in China, and now they have a fertility and low population crisis, all because of the stupid One Child Policy, the “communists” you hate are literally the ones that “burn down society” and yet you are promoting government birth control policies on those same lines (but I assume with more right-wing aesthetics instead). Lmfao.
That’s kind of the point. You want the sheep to think they are burning down society for some do-good ideology while the politicians sidestep the government into a into dictatorship or other kind of single party authoritarian system. Regardless, the politicians of the new government will be just fine.
I think that, to a certain extent, such a thing would actually benefit politicians: more cheap labor for industry. But eventually it would backfire on them, not so much because the population somehow became enlightened, but because social degradation would reach a breaking point that would lead to a widespread revolution, and given the intellectual characteristics of that population, there would be no way to rebuild again.
Plenty of examples of people burning down capitalism/mercantilism based societies too… It’s happening right now in the US.
Capitalism is not freedom, nor the devil. It’s just a tool. The same as communism or socialism. They each have their pros and cons.
Look at Canada, better healthcare because… Socialism. Cheaper more functional electrical companies because… Socialism. Then they use Capitalism for other industries that work just fine.
The economic system should really be set per-industry based on which one is likely to provide the best outcome.
As a broad overview, In my opinion, Communism should be used for land ownership, Socialism for core necessities, and Capitalism for luxuries.