• 3 Posts
  • 1.28K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle








  • See them? Zero

    The most common problem I have with other people’s dishes (often relatives) is that they are greasy after it’s been washed because they use the same water for the entire set of dishes and especially if their dish washing order sucks.

    When hand washing I always do it in a particular order:

    Re-usable Water Bottles, Pot lids which are not visibly dirty, Glasses/Cups, Utensils.

    If the water is now greasy, I will drain and re-fill at this point.

    Then Plates and bowls, Baking pans that are not greasy, Pots, Frying Pans, then Baking pans that are greasy.









  • The administration of a basic income sitting outside of the government?

    The government already has a list of every citizen registered via birth or immigration, and provides identification for people. They’re always going to need to do that. There’s really no reason to replicate that level of information outside of the government.

    Most people would just go online and register where you’d like your money to be sent (Direct deposit, Mailed cheque)

    However, you would still need a few call centers to handle issues, and If someone needs in-person support, the government already has common government service offices like DMVs and service centers that can provide in person service if required, saving significant money on needing dedicated service locations just for this one service.

    Tl;dr Economies of Scale matter, and it doesn’t make any sense to replicate the parts that the government already does and has to continue doing.



  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.catoProgramming@programming.devLLMS Are Not Fun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 days ago

    Improving your input, and the system message can also be part of that. There are multiple optimizations available for these systems that people aren’t really good at yet.

    It’s like watching Grandma google “Hi, I’d like a new shirt” back in the day and then having her complain that she’s getting absolutely terrible search results.


  • Because you can’t really have parts of both.

    Either you have wealth redistribution, or you don’t. A lower amount is still wealth redistribution.

    You can have a government, or you don’t. A smaller government is still a government.

    So if someone wants some wealth redistribution, and some government. They are just arguing how much of a Libertarian Socialist they are, not how much of a anarcho-capitalist they are.

    I personally am a Social Democrat. Capitalism is good most of the time, just make sure you’re holding the reigns tight so it goes in the right direction. Skip capitalism altogether for specific industries where it just doesn’t do very well and have the government run those ones directly.

    I’m neither a libertarian socialist, nor an anarcho-capitalist. Not even close to either of them, because again, it isn’t a spectrum.