• macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Or just use any other better search like Bing or duckduckgo. googol sucks and was never any good; quit pushing garbage.

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Kinda crazy that in a space where we are concerned about a armed and masked gunman murders a woman in cold blood, as we wonder how to best cope and move forward - people will still argue about search engine choices.

    • piranhaconda@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Going to take me a lonnnng time to retrain my brain to not use “google” as a verb. I need to swap to the generic “search” or something

      Edit: I didn’t realize, but am not at all surprised, that “google” is officially a verb in the Merriam Webster dictionary

      • phlegmy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        They might be, depending on their region.
        I only know what a q-tip is because I’ve seen americans say it online.
        And while Kleenex is a brand over here, you’d get a slightly funny look if you asked for ‘a kleenex’ rather than ‘a tissue’.

        Velcro is definitely used here though, and so is googling, but variants of ‘look it up’ are more commonly used because it’s more generic.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          In the Yahoo era, Google was merely better than its many competitors with equally stupid names. Circa 2015, when all those competitors were stone dead, you could type ‘who was that guy in that movie’ and it would correctly tell you it’s Russell Crowe.