• DBT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but all this switch does is make adds relevant/not relevant to you. It doesn’t stop whatever data is needed to make it work, does it?

    • Jumbie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Hey, get outta here. You’re supposed to blindly hate apple, sheep.

      /s for the stupid (not you).

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      At this point they’re shafting the advertisers. They may not be personalized ads to you, but the advertisers don’t know control where their ads show up. They just pay whenever their ads get displayed.

      Apple/Google still make the money regardless of “personalized” ads. They still group these users based on some data points like IP location and trends in those areas.

      These company’s worth didn’t grow to trillions without profiting off on both ends. Malicious compliance is the name of the game.

    • BigDiction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Apple IDFA

      It limits the use of a unique device id that can be shared with third parties. AFAIK it doesn’t limit anything for Apple’s 1st party apps that include advertising, like Maps.

      Notably Apple is spinning up a demand side platform (DSP) where advertisers can spend money directly on Apple platforms to place ads. That almost certainly means that platform will have full access to relevant user data for their ads customers.

      • dosboy0xff@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        When that setting gets checked, the IDFA gets set to all zeroes per the developer docs. So it definitely doesn’t stop data collection or attempts to target, it just changes that one data point. Instead of an easy “this specific account is associated with this action”, you instead get “someone who clicked the opt-out button is associated with this action - you’re going to have to target them using other details”

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Nor does it cut into the corporate revenues. They get paid for the ads either way. The odds of you clicking an ad (presumably) go down, though, so the click-through revenue the company would hypothetically get if you clicked on ads will be theoretically diminished assuming you believe the big tech companies aren’t lying about that data to their advertisers as well.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Just spam us based on the actual content being experienced, advertisers, gosh!

        Worked just about forever! (Well for however long the web had ads pre-personalization)