“A woman shall not wear anything that pertains to a man, nor shall a man put on a woman’s garment, for all who do so are an abomination to the LORD your God.”
Man christians gotta take the fun outta everything. What are they gonna ban next, anal!?
I mean, technically the time that the bible implies anal sex is bad is that time where some guys from Sodom wanted to rape a couple of angels who were disguised as men.
It strikes me that the lack of consent would be the issue here, yet somehow the takeaway for religious people is that gay bad? I don’t e
The parallelism there suggests that the issue is more with hospitality than homosexuality in particular. In this story, it is heterosexual rape that leads to the destruction of a city. Also kinda suggests that the people would have fucked the angels to death, like the poor concubine.
“A woman shall not wear anything that pertains to a man, nor shall a man put on a woman’s garment, for all who do so are an abomination to the LORD your God.”
Man christians gotta take the fun outta everything. What are they gonna ban next, anal!?
No, that’s the poophole loophole. It’s basically endorsed by god.
Here’s a fun jingle to remember it!
I mean, technically the time that the bible implies anal sex is bad is that time where some guys from Sodom wanted to rape a couple of angels who were disguised as men.
It strikes me that the lack of consent would be the issue here, yet somehow the takeaway for religious people is that gay bad? I don’t e
There’s a more horrifying story that no one talks about that parallels Sodom and Gomorrah - the story of Levite’s concubine.
The parallelism there suggests that the issue is more with hospitality than homosexuality in particular. In this story, it is heterosexual rape that leads to the destruction of a city. Also kinda suggests that the people would have fucked the angels to death, like the poor concubine.