• LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    They keep updating my windows 10 computers at work and the one I have at home. None of my Microsoft apps work, I can’t install paint, or photos or the Microsoft store. My personal computer freezes as soon as I open windows explorer. This just started after the last update.

    I already have a Linux server downstairs and this week converted me windows 10 pc to endeavor OS. It’s lightning fast and easy to use if you already know the problems with Linux.

  • KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “Slower” implies you’re projecting the same end results. Do they think the missing numbers are just not using a computer at all? In the digital age? By far your largest numbers of actual Win11 migrators are companies whose tech policy is the CYA “update everything in case we get hacked”.

    The common folk are not going to buy a new computer just to get a slower Windows installation. The people who migrate from Windows 10/7 holdouts are going to be migrating to Linux.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        That would be decades of legacy. I mean, with people paid to survive rewriting that legacy, should happen - if and when Linux is a mainstream platform. EDIT: … for companies’ workstations.

  • sonofearth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I really don’t see what more Windows has to offer than Linux other some shitty software that cannot be run on Linux (Looks at newer Office and Adobe). In that case I can just boot up a VM with black-flag Windows Pro on it.

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I really don’t see what more Windows has to offer than Linux

      Stability, updates management, built-in features (like window tiling), etc.

      Source: using Linux exclusively for almost a year now.

      • sonofearth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Wait… Either I have bad grammar or you misinterpreted lol. I meant “Linux has more to offer than Windows”

        • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          No. I said that there’s a bunch of things (e.g. stability, updates management, features (like window tiling), etc.) that Windows has and Linux does not.

          There’s A LOT Linux does great. There’s also a lot Windows does great that Linux massively fails at.

          Even some silly things like multi-screen support or saving windows positions between reboots… Lots of small things.

          • sonofearth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Linux has all of this out of the box (don’t know about windows positions after reboot, I have never tried that even on Windows). What distro and DE are you using? I am using Arch with KDE Plasma and it has been pretty much flawless and stable for me.

            • FarrellPerks@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              42 minutes ago

              Using Bazzite with KDE Desktop and can confirm that it keeps multi-window positions after reboot.

            • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Especially when you’re on Arch with KDE, you don’t have:

              1. good update management
              2. window tiling
              3. saving window positions

              I know because I’m on Arch with KDE.

              By “good update management” I mean what MS does - all updates are pushed once a month, on Patch Tuesday (second Tuesday of the month). You can put it in your calendar and plan for a necessary reboot.

              I know Arch is a rolling release so it doesn’t have that on purpose, but it’s not much better with Ubuntu - I was getting updates every couple of days, once a week at best.

              Window tiling doesn’t exist “out of the box”, you need third party software (which, apparently still doesn’t give you what Windows has out of the box) or a switch from KDE to COSMIC, which still doesn’t give you the freedom of choice that Windows has (it’s either “everything is tiled” or “nothing is tiled”).

              Saving window positions (on Wayland) is the most confusing one, because it seems like the one that’d be the easiest to implement, but KDE devs just flat out refuse to do it. I hear that it works on X11.

              Multi-monitor support is piss poor. If I spread my windows across multiple monitors and then turn one monitor off, those windows are no longer accessible. SDDM displays the same interface on each monitor, and each is a separate instance of SDDM - meaning, you can type in your password on monitor 2, and if you press “OK” on monitor 1, it will fail, because the password field is empty. It’s just silly design. On Windows, if you disconnect an extra screen, all the content gets dropped on the main screen. Since Windows 11, if you then re-connect the screen, all windows will pop back into their places before the disconnect happened.

  • vaderaj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Successfully booted up Linux mint today, stayed on windows for uni (thinking I might need one of those Microsoft apps). Missed Linux and now back :)

  • IonTempted@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Because Windows 11 shouldn’t have been made in the first place, I can’t find one reason why they couldn’t just kept updating 10.

    • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      The TPM 2.0 chip on newer motherboards expand Microsoft’s ability to spy on you. It was probably hard to implement on W10 without a full revamp so they just said fuck it and made W11.

    • Simplicity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 hours ago

      One good reason: so all of the fucking half ass obnoxious shit that have put into 11 didn’t taint 10.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Beside greed, forcing people to use fully integrated AI. Cuz they know damn well that 90% of us will disable that shit like we did One Drive.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I don’t even think it’s greed at this point. As far as I know, no one is making money on AI. Even NVIDIA is cooking the books by investing in AI companies and just making them use the invested money to buy graphics cards. They report those as sales but are they really sales if they gave them the money in the first place?

        I think the real reason Microsoft is shoving AI down everyone’s throats is because they went all-in on AI and they’re hoping to keep the bubble going for now and somehow it will work out in the end. It’s literally a fake it until you make it strategy with zero guarantee of making it.

        A lot of it I think is just driven by managers with AI FOMO. They really don’t know what AI is supposed to do but they’re hoping users will figure it out.

        • BanMe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          18 hours ago

          When you have a solution in search of a problem, and lots of money to push that solution. They assume their customers will invent the use cases and workflows that might make it valuable,

        • dil@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Pretty good for live transcription, are blind or partially blind ppl using it? Translation I guess. Better recognition. Idk how useful the language models specifically are, ai everywhere else is useful. Like in gene sequencing and making mediciine. Ai can like find diffrerent combinations that make the same result, idr why thats good, just that itd take humans many many years to simulate what they can have ai run through.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            seems like a very small population, that may or may not benefit from it. no justification other than shove down everyones throat to stave off the bubble.

      • IonTempted@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Funny thing is I still don’t know why they needed a new version of Windows for that, I mean 10 was already bloat they could have just shoved AI into it, as in the TPM 2.0 they could have just made a new 25H(whatever the fuck) version where you’d need to enable that on the motherboard.

        • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I’m guessing to capture the consumers that just upgrade without thinking. Like they’ll 100% put this shit in next years iphone and people won’t even blink.

        • Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          It’s because Apple moved on from X. They skipped 9 just because they didn’t want to be behind Apple.

          • IonTempted@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            It sounds like when Microsoft named their second console “360” because they wouldn’t want to be behind Sony. But somehow I’m not buying that

  • DeICEAmerica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    LMAO says the guy typing from a Windows 7 Desktop purchased in 2012. This PC still works amazingly well for a 13 year old Alienware. Anyone who has ever owned one will tell you this a unicorn. I will never click the update icon sitting in the tray for years now. Get fucked. This OS still rocks. If I want to play a current game I open up my laptop and close it when done.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    This article is trash, it mentions existing windows 10 features in windows 11 like it’s a groundbreaking new technology.

    Virtual desktops and clipboard manager? Cmon man we’ve been having that for years now

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Blows my mind seeing people look on windows 10 as some kind of last bastion, apparently not realizing that was Windows 7 at best.

    10 is the one where they fucked up the UX beyond repair, made everything slow and added insane amounts of spying. If you willingly switched to 10 then don’t pretend like 11 is a bridge too far now.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I’d actually say it was 8.1, but the problem with 8.1 is that it died before people could discover how good it is combined with classical start menu. It was basically a fleshed out, faster, more stable Windows 7 with updated tech like newer directx and cached boot (aka. Fastboot). Almost non-existing market share, but I liked it far better than 7, 10 and 11 (only gave it 1 week). I installed a tweaked 8.1 version on all my friends/family’s PCs and never heard a single complaint, shit was awesome.

    • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 day ago

      I still can’t grasp that Microsoft, a $3.6 trillion company, developed a new settings interface but failed to migrate all settings to it, forcing users to use both. Even I know that’s day one UX shite and I’m quite stupid.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      It took me ages today to work out how to map a drive letter because they’ve changed where the menu button is. You used to be able to do it from the taskbar at the top, but now it’s hidden in a right click menu in a different part of the file browser to where it used to be. I don’t understand the point of changes like that, by all means add more options but keep the old ones around for consistency.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Managing printers in 11 is the worst. The sad part is that the old-style devices and printers menu is still in the OS, you just have to dig for it a bit, and it works 1000x better.

        • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          the old-style devices and printers menu is still in the OS, you just have to dig for it a bit, and it works 1000x better.

          For the last 13 years this has been the most infuriating part of the incomplete control panel migration. I find myself struggling to use the new settings, and having to then resort to digging for the old ones that actually have the option I need.

          Win 11 finally pushed me over the edge with ads and spying. But I still have to deal with Windows at work.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      10 is the one where they fucked up the UX beyond repair

      Was it? I gave up on 8 because of the UI, downgraded back to 7 and that was my last Windows machine. Was 10 worse?

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        8 was such a disaster that people don’t really consider it a real version of windows. 10 was actually better than 8 but that’s not saying much

    • sudoku@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      People said they will never upgrade from 7 to 10, and now they are saying they will never upgrade from 10 to 11

      • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        and now they are saying they will never upgrade from 10 to 11

        The stats show people are committing this time. English speakers are jumping ship at historically unprecedented rates. Steam stats

      • kazerniel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        ^ This, I had to be dragged kicking and screaming from 7 to 10, and now looking forward to another 3 years of Win10 security updates, while fervently praying that Adobe and my online games add Linux support during that time >_>

        • Kay Ohtie@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Will it make you even more frustrated to learn Steam has a Linux-native build of Substance Painter, but Adobe still won’t support it themselves?

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Ah yes the classic purist arguement.

            If the applications I want to use don’t support Linux then apparently that’s their problem. I wish I didn’t have to live in the real world, but unfortunately I can’t pay my mortgage in moral righteousness. If I can’t use the programs I need to use my job, because I’ve decided to switch to an operating system that they don’t support, I’m the one that’s going to suffer.

            So no you can’t just ditch applications that don’t have Linux support.

            In the real world you have to dual boot and that’s a pain in the arse because it means Microsoft are still going to be getting some money from me.

            • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              The fuck sort of dipshit argument is this for video games…?

              He was saying ditch video games man… VIDEO GAMES.

              • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I can’t switch to purely Linux because I need windows in order to be able to do my job. The fact I also play games on the computer is irrelevant.

                I don’t understand what you’re not understanding.

            • Evotech@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              It’s a catch 22. If you need applications to make money sure. But games. Come on.

              I get a PC from my job, it has windows and that’s their choice.

    • Daedskin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was on Windows 7 until April of 2021, when I was taking a certification exam remotely, and didn’t find out that the software they used for it didn’t work on 7 until after I had paid the registration fee. Windows 10 was useable enough, but I never thought it was preferable over 7. Anyway, I’m on Bazzite now.

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Considering all of the comments saying that a big part of this is people not wanting to buy new computers and choosing linux because it will run on their old machine, I’d like to add insult to injury and say I built a new PC before Oct and windows was never even a consideration.

    And despite it being my first Linux install I planned to play games on, everything went smoothly and I’d even say the “setting up the PC to my preference instead of the defaults” step was better because there wasn’t a “figure out how to disable the shit ms really wants you to run for them” substep, or a “figure out what new shit ms added that I’ll want to disable” discovery mode that, with win 10, lasted most of the time I was using it and included “figure out if a recent update reset settings to annoying defaults”.

    I bet this is why people are so vocal about switching to linux whenever there’s another complaint about ms. It went way better than expected, like I was about to do something that would cause ongoing pain and frustration to get away from something even worse, but there’s been nothing at all that has made me miss windows.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeah. I built my PC two years back and Linux was the main idea for it. I’d used Linux on and off since 2007, and it’s honestly been fine this entire time, with WINE and such only improving over time. I remember how baffled I was back in 2007 when I didn’t have to install any drivers myself, everything just worked out of the box, even fucking printers.

      This is the time of Windows Vista, where nothing worked.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah, I’ve got a logitech mouse but didn’t want logitech’s software on my machine, so I just used the mouse by plugging it in. Which worked, but I had no way of knowing the battery level until the mouse itself started blinking low power.

        When I installed fedora, I was confused a bit because it had a system tray icon saying the battery was charging. I was thinking it thought it was a laptop until I realize it had just picked up the battery information from my mouse. A feature I had written off under windows just worked without me even considering it or needing to install software that was partly about using my hardware and partially about advertising more ways to get my money.

        • commander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          For a Logitech mouse on Linux I use Solaar. Pretty much why I go with Logitech mice now. Solaar works well for me

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s almost like “you have to buy a new laptop to install it and help train our AI on your private documents” is somehow not convincing enough. Maybe if they also removed local accounts and forced you to have an online MS account? Nah scratch that, it would be stupid

  • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    219
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It was possible to skip Vista and go straight from XP to 7. You could even use the same PC.

    It was possible to skip 8 and go straight from 7 to 10. You could even use the same PC.

    This time around, Microsoft is forcing Windows 11 as the only option, forcing people to throw away their machines, and it is backfiring on them. People are rejecting it and the competition (Linux) has never been as good as it is today.

    The executive also noted that 500 million PCs don’t meet Windows 11’s system requirements

    So much unnecessary e-waste. I never want to hear about how ‘green’ or ‘sustainable’ Microsoft is again.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Apparently some are even opting to reinstall Windows 7 rather than the trash fire that is 11. It seems like 10 was never loved, merely tolerated, and as MS continues to enshittify 10 in an attempt to force people onto 11 some are just going back to the previous good version of Windows.

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Those people are stupid. Run a version of windows that won’t make you part of a botnet and make you my problem or don’t run it at all.

        • kurikai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          If they are taking the time to install windows 7. I’m sure they are at least smart enough to not run random stuff on thier windows machine.

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t care what they’re running. Don’t connect an unsupported OS to the Internet or you’re eventually going to become my problem.

            • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              That’s not how it works, especially since everyone doing this is behind a modern router.

              Nothing will happen if you have a Windows 98 computer connected to the internet when the home internet router is on default settings. And modern internet browsers implement security in themselves on systems they still support.

              Firefox still supports Windows 7 via the ESR channel, and every new install gets redirected to on automatically on Windows 7, 8 and 8.1.

              Worry the unsupported systems behind pure internet or providing public internet services, or the users installing the free PDF editor Google advertised as first in search. Those are many more than older Windows enthusiasts.

              • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                especially since everyone doing this is behind a modern router.

                Are they? If they’re irresponsible enough to run an ancient OS it wouldn’t shock me if they’re also running “retro” network equipment

                • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  They are not, come on now.

                  Retro networking is a different community, and all is still done behind a modern router. They are a subset of the retro computing community, but they don’t run such systems as their daily driver.

                  Most of the legacy OS enthusiasts running on as their daily driver are not interested in matching their networking to be period correct, they just want it to work well and quickly like everybody else. For that you need basic modern equipment, that is often included into ISP plans.

            • orclev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              They should just run Linux, but if they have to do Windows then 7 is just as good as 10 now, they’re both equally unsupported. Blame Microsoft for fucking up 10 and 11 so bad nobody is willing to run them. If they had at least left 10 alone people would still be using that but they’re too greedy for everyone’s data and they couldn’t leave well enough alone. It’s also not like there aren’t an absolute ton of Windows 10 and 11 installs that are part of bot nets. Running a new version of Windows makes it slightly harder to get rooted, but doing stupid stuff no matter what you’re running is ultimately the problem, not the version of Windows. The age of worms self propagating through service 0-days is largely over, it’s almost all phishing and trojans these days. It would be one thing if we were talking Windows 98 or XP, but 7 is fairly solid out of the box.

      • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Windows 10 was when the stupid accounts became a thing on Windows and candy crush being installed after a fresh install so makes sense people never really loved 10. And they managed to make 11 even worse than it was at launch with the copilot crap.

    • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      Anyone who asks me about this is getting the “At least try Linux for free first before buying a new computer.

      Another example I have is that my mother-in-law is retired. You think she needs a new computer? Nope! She’s getting Linux before a new computer. The only other option for her would be an iPad since she’s just browsing the web anyway.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      You could install windows 10 on something designed for windows XP, provided it has enough RAM

      The reason w11 needs a new PC is pure marketing, it doesn’t actually need some specific feature that is present on 8th gen Intel CPUs but not on 7th gen Intel CPUs

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Very good point. Especially with how broken pricing has been on home computers for years, throwing away your machine for something impossibly expensive is a tough sell to say the least. Especially in this economy. It‘s more feasible to switch to Linux.

  • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because 8 was garbage and people got rid of it as soon as possible. 10 was actually good, and 11 was barely a change functionally until they started messing with the ads push, and now they’re shoving LLM bullshit in to justify their exorbitant expenditures on the half functional tech.

    • TBi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep. I Kept 7 for as long as possible but had to upgrade so 10 was next. I wouldn’t move to 11 if support continued for 10.

      • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        You probably know this, but for others who might not: MS is now allowing some/many/all (???) people to extend the security updates for Win10 for another year free of charge. You have to go into the Windows update area and click a button to accept. At least in the USA, this seems to be a somewhat newly available option, as it was there the last time someone asked me to look at their laptop to see if I could upgrade it to Win11.

        • TBi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I had already upgraded when I saw this. But it’s only another year, if it was 2-3 years I’d actually take the hit and roll back. I’d actually pay for it! Although next year I might move totally over to Linux. Will see.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        . I wouldn’t move to 11 if support continued for 10.

        Which is exactly the reason they’re ending support.

        If you don’t have a reason to stay, Linux is definitely worth a shot. I moved from 10 to Bazzite in my rig earlier in the year, and it’s been pretty solid.

        • TBi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have bazzite Linux as dual boot. Few usecases stop me from moving fully over. Nvidia drivers and VR support. And Remote Desktop doesn’t work the way I want it to.

          Also for some reason my ryzen system stopped seeing my linux sata drive in bios so can’t boot anymore.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Interesting. I ditched team green years ago and have been running rock solid since. My Nvidia GPU was always the reason I went back to windows. Sorry to hear your ryzen rig stopped, have you looked for a bios update? Might be something simple like that (assuming your disk didn’t shit the bed).

            Can’t say I’ve had any rdp issues on Bazzite, what’s it doing?

            • TBi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              I can see the disk in windows. It just doesn’t show up in the bios. I’ve been recommended to do a fully CMOS reset by pulling out battery but don’t really have time. It disappeared after a BIOS update :)

              As for RDP. I regularly RDP to my windows machine and it auto changes resolution. And then I can log in on the PC itself and it returns to the monitor resolution. So I keep the same session but view it from multiple places.

              I can’t get the same on Linux. Either I get my current session which doesn’t resize (stuck at connected monitor resolution). Or it creates a new resizable session which I don’t want because I want to continue what I was doing.

              • BrioxorMorbide@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                I’ve been recommended to do a fully CMOS reset by pulling out battery but don’t really have time. It disappeared after a BIOS update :)

                Did you load the default BIOS settings after that? If not, that might be easier than removing the battery.

                And if you did, the default settings could have enabled the CSM, or changed other settings like fast boot that might make the drive not show up.

                • TBi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Tried every reset option. I set to RAID mode and I saw hard disk in bios but boot failed at bazzite load screen.

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                That is definitely odd behavior. Multiple sessions is a server side setting, so your Linux system shouldn’t be able to do that without windows being ok with it. As for the resolution issue, it might be a config issue in your client. Give another client a shot, or see if there’s a way to configure the client to use smart sizing. I can’t recall which app I use on my system, but I can’t say I’ve ever had an issue with scaling between connected and remote connected sessions.

          • BrioxorMorbide@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Have you checked your BIOS if CSM is enabled (gets disabled when enabling secure boot iirc)? If your Linux drive has an old partitioning scheme it needs that to show up during boot I think.

            • TBi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              I’ll try it. But I don’t see the drive detected in the BIOS so thought it might be more than that.

              Also bazzite should have secure boot.

              I’ll let you know!

  • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    Obviously. There is no particular reason to switch from old 7th or older gen intel CPUs since with 16GB (or even with 8) of RAM one can browse internet and use OFFICE 365 with no issues. And what most of people do with their computers at work?

    Unless PC is used to render 3D/Video/DAW Audio/heavy VMs - there is no fucking need to buy new PC just to upgrade to win11. MS shot themselves in a foot with this one.