In August 2025, Google announced that starting next year, it will no longer be possible to develop apps for the Android platform without first registering centrally with Google. This registration will involve:
-
Paying a fee to Google
-
Agreeing to Google’s Terms and Conditions
-
Providing government identification
-
Uploading evidence of the developer’s private signing key
-
Listing all current and future application identifiers
-
Here is the https://keepandroidopen.org/
We need a viable alternative to Android. Google has clearly shown that it’s a terrible steward for anything under its wing. Even if they somehow backtrack, they will continue pushing anti consumer practices in the long term. It’s been a couple of years now that I can’t install an apk that is unavailable in my country, because they’re somehow verifying my country with Google Play services. I’ve managed to ditch Chrome this year after 16 years and I’m not looking back, I wish I had done this earlier. If only there was an open Android alternative I could jump to.
You are way underestimating the difficulty of that
Android is tye result of billions of dollars worth of development
Look up OpenHarmony which is a FOSS version of Huawei’s HarmonyOS
I’m keenly watching GrapheneOS and what they plan to do; supposedly they are working on a strategy.
Long-term, yeah Android needs a rival; I hope at least one of the Linux Phone projects out there can get good enough to use on some common brands or make an entirely new platform viable.
What sucks is more and more android phones are locked down and won’t ever allow you to root or change the OS. As far as US working phones, it’s almost down to only Pixels, which is likely going to change soon; and OnePlus.
I don’t know anyone who owns a OnePlus phone.
i own OP12R, BUT THEY are also locking down the newer versions.
So will there even be any companies left that can be flashed?
The day they come out with that phone they’re supposedly working on I intend to buy it.
No strategy needed. GOS are not “Certified Devices”.
That seems to be their mid-term strategy, release their own certified device. That should have some interesting implications on safetynet attestation, too.
I still think we need a fork of AOSP, before the community atrophies any further.
If you look up what “Certified Device” means in the context of Android, we don’t want that.
GrapheneOS is a fork of AOSP.
Honestly, I don’t know if having play services running in a profile that can be deleted would pass that standard for certification. Probably not, I guess.
As for being a fork, I mean the larger community of Graphene, Lineage, Calyx if it continues to exist, and probably a couple Chinese manufacturers who rely on AOSP to manage a fork that is collaboratively developed going forward, that no longer relies on Google’s maintenance of the project.
Yeah that’s just a gargantuan task or someone would have done it already. Sadly, too few people care to make that happen.
Huawei did it (HarmonyOS) but only because they’re a huge company with the necessary resources, and because they were legally prevented from using Android.
I know, but it’s looking more and more like there won’t be an alternative for long. I’d rather have a consortium of interests united in moving a fork forward as the core for all of their own OS’s.
Mmmm, but the Pixel devices are…
I can’t use contactless payments on my GOS Pixel 9, so…
Be a real man and carry cash.
Looking forward to getting a new phone with Sailfish OS. Seems to be the most advanced, open OS as of now.
I don’t think open Android is viable.
It’s technically open, but it’s structured in a way that it’s de facto not open.
I am personally planning to move over to a Linux phone of some sort. Going to keep my A73 for critical apps/use cases and slowly move over to a Linux phone.
In a way, it’s good that Google is killing sideloading (in the real sense, where I decide what gets installed, not some hoodlums in Mount View or wherever).
An open Android is perfectly viable, it can even be hardforked if people are that unhappy with what Google did with it over the years.
I think mobile Linux has functional advantages that can make it a lot more desirable, but there is no reason a truly open Android cannot exist.
There’s nothing about AOSP that’s not open. The thing that’s not open is the Play Store and FCM notifications. So long as everyone continues uploading exclusively to Play Store and not supporting UnifiedPush, even those who should absolutely know better, the Android ecosystem might as well be closed.
From what I understand the new, more closed way Google adds patches to AOSP does make Android more closed albeit technically open.
Many FOSS apps support UP and there’s a vibrant open source community outside of Google’s walled garden. Have you browsed Izzy’s repo? That’s not the problem as i see it.
My Fairphone runs e/os, a lineage-based ROM. So no certification. But my device is certified… I wouldn’t put it past the big evil to bake in some sort of cascading dependence that will block certified devices from even AOSP.