-credit to nedroid for strange art

  • 6 Posts
  • 404 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle









  • Arghblarg@lemmy.catoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldsneakerweb
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hmm, sounds like a nice tie-in to anonymous USB dead-drop sites and so on. Go connect to a tree somewhere, upload your new .snk files, download any new ones placed there since your last visit :)

    Maybe have a Meshtastic solar-powered node feeding new .snk files onto it too, from afar!








  • …and they deserve eternal damnation for the idea, IMO. Hrrmph. LLMs by definition can only make derivative works. That’s what they do, draw from their training on other works by humans. They are nothing without the training data. Data which was scraped from the entire f*cking Internet, without anyone’s permissions. Why is this so hard for devs to understand?

    Yes, I am grumpy about this.


  • From the article:

    …given the pretty massive and widespread architectural changes needed to make the implementation libified and memory safe, we decided that the codebase is not a derivative work that would require carrying forward the GPL license and have decided to release the code under the MIT instead.


    I’m sorry but that pisses me right the hell off. I don’t care who it is, using this rewrite-by-LLM to work around the GPL is just going to be a pox on the global software landscape.

    Basically the author is saying “if you can afford to spend $20K on tokens, buy your way around the GPL! Those with the cash can bend, nay break, the rules!”

    This is just abhorrent to me. It’s STILL a derivative work, git already existed and these LLMs 100%, for sure, used knowledge from their training of the original C git implementation. Just because no one knows exactly how, where or when in the process it occurred, we know the LLMs all had access to original git in their training data.